Diagnosis: Toxic! - Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations

Sebastian Hoffmann, Thomas Hartung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The assessment of relevance of toxicological testing was compared with approaches of diagnostic medicine, a discipline that faces a comparable situation. Considering the work of a toxicologist as setting a diagnosis for compounds, assessment tools for diagnostic tests were transferred to toxicological tests. In clinical diagnostics, test uncertainty is well accepted and incorporated in this assessment. Furthermore, prevalence information is considered to evaluate the gain in information resulting from the application of a test. Several common toxicological scenarios, in which test uncertainty and prevalence are combined, are discussed including the interdependence of test accuracy, prevalence and predictive values or the sequential application of a screening and a confirmatory test. In addition, real prevalences derived from prevalences determined by an imperfect test are presented. We conclude that information on prevalences of toxic health effects is required to allow a complete assessment of the relevance of toxicological test. In this process, lessons can be learned from evidence-based approaches in clinical diagnostics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-428
Number of pages7
JournalToxicological Sciences
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Poisons
Toxicology
Medicine
Screening
Health
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Uncertainty
Testing

Keywords

  • Biometry
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Prevalence
  • Reference standard
  • Risk assessment
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Cite this

Diagnosis : Toxic! - Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations. / Hoffmann, Sebastian; Hartung, Thomas.

In: Toxicological Sciences, Vol. 85, No. 1, 05.2005, p. 422-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15b7d58fc9824166a35398e4da4d637d,
title = "Diagnosis: Toxic! - Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations",
abstract = "The assessment of relevance of toxicological testing was compared with approaches of diagnostic medicine, a discipline that faces a comparable situation. Considering the work of a toxicologist as setting a diagnosis for compounds, assessment tools for diagnostic tests were transferred to toxicological tests. In clinical diagnostics, test uncertainty is well accepted and incorporated in this assessment. Furthermore, prevalence information is considered to evaluate the gain in information resulting from the application of a test. Several common toxicological scenarios, in which test uncertainty and prevalence are combined, are discussed including the interdependence of test accuracy, prevalence and predictive values or the sequential application of a screening and a confirmatory test. In addition, real prevalences derived from prevalences determined by an imperfect test are presented. We conclude that information on prevalences of toxic health effects is required to allow a complete assessment of the relevance of toxicological test. In this process, lessons can be learned from evidence-based approaches in clinical diagnostics.",
keywords = "Biometry, Evidence-based medicine, Prevalence, Reference standard, Risk assessment, Validation",
author = "Sebastian Hoffmann and Thomas Hartung",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1093/toxsci/kfi099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "422--428",
journal = "Toxicological Sciences",
issn = "1096-6080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis

T2 - Toxic! - Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations

AU - Hoffmann, Sebastian

AU - Hartung, Thomas

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - The assessment of relevance of toxicological testing was compared with approaches of diagnostic medicine, a discipline that faces a comparable situation. Considering the work of a toxicologist as setting a diagnosis for compounds, assessment tools for diagnostic tests were transferred to toxicological tests. In clinical diagnostics, test uncertainty is well accepted and incorporated in this assessment. Furthermore, prevalence information is considered to evaluate the gain in information resulting from the application of a test. Several common toxicological scenarios, in which test uncertainty and prevalence are combined, are discussed including the interdependence of test accuracy, prevalence and predictive values or the sequential application of a screening and a confirmatory test. In addition, real prevalences derived from prevalences determined by an imperfect test are presented. We conclude that information on prevalences of toxic health effects is required to allow a complete assessment of the relevance of toxicological test. In this process, lessons can be learned from evidence-based approaches in clinical diagnostics.

AB - The assessment of relevance of toxicological testing was compared with approaches of diagnostic medicine, a discipline that faces a comparable situation. Considering the work of a toxicologist as setting a diagnosis for compounds, assessment tools for diagnostic tests were transferred to toxicological tests. In clinical diagnostics, test uncertainty is well accepted and incorporated in this assessment. Furthermore, prevalence information is considered to evaluate the gain in information resulting from the application of a test. Several common toxicological scenarios, in which test uncertainty and prevalence are combined, are discussed including the interdependence of test accuracy, prevalence and predictive values or the sequential application of a screening and a confirmatory test. In addition, real prevalences derived from prevalences determined by an imperfect test are presented. We conclude that information on prevalences of toxic health effects is required to allow a complete assessment of the relevance of toxicological test. In this process, lessons can be learned from evidence-based approaches in clinical diagnostics.

KW - Biometry

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Prevalence

KW - Reference standard

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444421702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444421702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/toxsci/kfi099

DO - 10.1093/toxsci/kfi099

M3 - Article

C2 - 15689419

AN - SCOPUS:17444421702

VL - 85

SP - 422

EP - 428

JO - Toxicological Sciences

JF - Toxicological Sciences

SN - 1096-6080

IS - 1

ER -