Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries by Using Three-dimensional MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

Delaram Shakoor, Richard Kijowski, Ali Guermazi, Jan Fritz, Frank W. Roemer, Sahar Jalali-Farahani, John Eng, Shadpour Demehri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) MRI for depicting meniscal injuries of the knee by using surgery as the standard of reference. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify original studies published between 1985 and 2017. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) MRI for the assessment of knee meniscal injuries and to evaluate the impact of relevant covariates on the diagnostic performance for assessment of knee meniscal injuries. Results Of identified records, 31 studies (1743 3D knee MRI examinations) were included (23 studies also reported the results of 2D MRI). All studies before 2008 used gradient-echo (GRE) sequences, whereas all studies after 2011 used fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. By comparing FSE and GRE sequences with 2D MRI, pooled estimate of sensitivity (90.0%; P = .2 and 90.1%; P = .2 vs 88.5%) and pooled estimate of specificity (91%; P = .3 and 89.8% vs 90.1%; P = .7) were comparable. The 3D FSE sequences demonstrated similar diagnostic performance as 3D GRE sequences, except for slightly improved sensitivity for depicting lateral meniscal injuries (FSE, 84.6%; GRE, 75%; P = .01). The specificity of 3D sequences improved when multiplanar reformatting was performed (P = .02). Conclusion Both three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (FSE) and 3D gradient-echo (GRE) sequences had similar diagnostic performance as two-dimensional sequences, with slight superior sensitivity of 3D FSE sequences compared with 3D GRE sequences for depicting lateral meniscal injuries of the knee.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-445
Number of pages11
JournalRadiology
Volume290
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Knee Injuries
Meta-Analysis
ROC Curve
Knee
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries by Using Three-dimensional MRI : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. / Shakoor, Delaram; Kijowski, Richard; Guermazi, Ali; Fritz, Jan; Roemer, Frank W.; Jalali-Farahani, Sahar; Eng, John; Demehri, Shadpour.

In: Radiology, Vol. 290, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 435-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shakoor, Delaram ; Kijowski, Richard ; Guermazi, Ali ; Fritz, Jan ; Roemer, Frank W. ; Jalali-Farahani, Sahar ; Eng, John ; Demehri, Shadpour. / Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries by Using Three-dimensional MRI : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. In: Radiology. 2019 ; Vol. 290, No. 2. pp. 435-445.
@article{e5269a1e3da1479ebfb4c47f1494e0e9,
title = "Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries by Using Three-dimensional MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance",
abstract = "Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) MRI for depicting meniscal injuries of the knee by using surgery as the standard of reference. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify original studies published between 1985 and 2017. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) MRI for the assessment of knee meniscal injuries and to evaluate the impact of relevant covariates on the diagnostic performance for assessment of knee meniscal injuries. Results Of identified records, 31 studies (1743 3D knee MRI examinations) were included (23 studies also reported the results of 2D MRI). All studies before 2008 used gradient-echo (GRE) sequences, whereas all studies after 2011 used fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. By comparing FSE and GRE sequences with 2D MRI, pooled estimate of sensitivity (90.0{\%}; P = .2 and 90.1{\%}; P = .2 vs 88.5{\%}) and pooled estimate of specificity (91{\%}; P = .3 and 89.8{\%} vs 90.1{\%}; P = .7) were comparable. The 3D FSE sequences demonstrated similar diagnostic performance as 3D GRE sequences, except for slightly improved sensitivity for depicting lateral meniscal injuries (FSE, 84.6{\%}; GRE, 75{\%}; P = .01). The specificity of 3D sequences improved when multiplanar reformatting was performed (P = .02). Conclusion Both three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (FSE) and 3D gradient-echo (GRE) sequences had similar diagnostic performance as two-dimensional sequences, with slight superior sensitivity of 3D FSE sequences compared with 3D GRE sequences for depicting lateral meniscal injuries of the knee.",
author = "Delaram Shakoor and Richard Kijowski and Ali Guermazi and Jan Fritz and Roemer, {Frank W.} and Sahar Jalali-Farahani and John Eng and Shadpour Demehri",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2018181212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "290",
pages = "435--445",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injuries by Using Three-dimensional MRI

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

AU - Shakoor, Delaram

AU - Kijowski, Richard

AU - Guermazi, Ali

AU - Fritz, Jan

AU - Roemer, Frank W.

AU - Jalali-Farahani, Sahar

AU - Eng, John

AU - Demehri, Shadpour

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) MRI for depicting meniscal injuries of the knee by using surgery as the standard of reference. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify original studies published between 1985 and 2017. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) MRI for the assessment of knee meniscal injuries and to evaluate the impact of relevant covariates on the diagnostic performance for assessment of knee meniscal injuries. Results Of identified records, 31 studies (1743 3D knee MRI examinations) were included (23 studies also reported the results of 2D MRI). All studies before 2008 used gradient-echo (GRE) sequences, whereas all studies after 2011 used fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. By comparing FSE and GRE sequences with 2D MRI, pooled estimate of sensitivity (90.0%; P = .2 and 90.1%; P = .2 vs 88.5%) and pooled estimate of specificity (91%; P = .3 and 89.8% vs 90.1%; P = .7) were comparable. The 3D FSE sequences demonstrated similar diagnostic performance as 3D GRE sequences, except for slightly improved sensitivity for depicting lateral meniscal injuries (FSE, 84.6%; GRE, 75%; P = .01). The specificity of 3D sequences improved when multiplanar reformatting was performed (P = .02). Conclusion Both three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (FSE) and 3D gradient-echo (GRE) sequences had similar diagnostic performance as two-dimensional sequences, with slight superior sensitivity of 3D FSE sequences compared with 3D GRE sequences for depicting lateral meniscal injuries of the knee.

AB - Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) MRI for depicting meniscal injuries of the knee by using surgery as the standard of reference. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify original studies published between 1985 and 2017. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performance of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) MRI for the assessment of knee meniscal injuries and to evaluate the impact of relevant covariates on the diagnostic performance for assessment of knee meniscal injuries. Results Of identified records, 31 studies (1743 3D knee MRI examinations) were included (23 studies also reported the results of 2D MRI). All studies before 2008 used gradient-echo (GRE) sequences, whereas all studies after 2011 used fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. By comparing FSE and GRE sequences with 2D MRI, pooled estimate of sensitivity (90.0%; P = .2 and 90.1%; P = .2 vs 88.5%) and pooled estimate of specificity (91%; P = .3 and 89.8% vs 90.1%; P = .7) were comparable. The 3D FSE sequences demonstrated similar diagnostic performance as 3D GRE sequences, except for slightly improved sensitivity for depicting lateral meniscal injuries (FSE, 84.6%; GRE, 75%; P = .01). The specificity of 3D sequences improved when multiplanar reformatting was performed (P = .02). Conclusion Both three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (FSE) and 3D gradient-echo (GRE) sequences had similar diagnostic performance as two-dimensional sequences, with slight superior sensitivity of 3D FSE sequences compared with 3D GRE sequences for depicting lateral meniscal injuries of the knee.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060379290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060379290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2018181212

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2018181212

M3 - Article

C2 - 30457479

AN - SCOPUS:85060379290

VL - 290

SP - 435

EP - 445

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -