Diagnosis of breast lesions: Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review

Stefan M. Willems, C. H M Van Deurzen, P. J. Van Diest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Diagnosis of breast lesions is routinely performed by the triple assessment of a specialised surgeon, radiologist and pathologist. In this setting, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are the current methods of choice for pathological diagnosis, both with their specific advantages and limitations. Evidence-based literature discussing which of both modalities is preferable in breast lesion diagnosis is sparse and there is no consensus among different specialised breast cancer centres. This study reviews FNAC and CNB for diagnosing breast lesions, comparing methodological issues, diagnostic performance indices, possibilities for additional prognostic and predictive tests and cost effectiveness. Overall, CNB achieved better sensitivity and specificity especially in those lesions that were not definitively benign or malignant, non-palpable and/or calcified lesions. Although FNAC is easier to perform, interpretation requires vast experience and even then, it is more often inconclusive requiring additional CNB. The authors conclude that overall CNB is to be preferred as a diagnostic method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-292
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Large-Core Needle Biopsy
Fine Needle Biopsy
Cell Biology
Breast
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Breast Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Diagnosis of breast lesions : Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review. / Willems, Stefan M.; Van Deurzen, C. H M; Van Diest, P. J.

In: Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 287-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Willems, Stefan M. ; Van Deurzen, C. H M ; Van Diest, P. J. / Diagnosis of breast lesions : Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review. In: Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2012 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 287-292.
@article{cae9c3f345664129832cf815cb158d17,
title = "Diagnosis of breast lesions: Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review",
abstract = "Diagnosis of breast lesions is routinely performed by the triple assessment of a specialised surgeon, radiologist and pathologist. In this setting, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are the current methods of choice for pathological diagnosis, both with their specific advantages and limitations. Evidence-based literature discussing which of both modalities is preferable in breast lesion diagnosis is sparse and there is no consensus among different specialised breast cancer centres. This study reviews FNAC and CNB for diagnosing breast lesions, comparing methodological issues, diagnostic performance indices, possibilities for additional prognostic and predictive tests and cost effectiveness. Overall, CNB achieved better sensitivity and specificity especially in those lesions that were not definitively benign or malignant, non-palpable and/or calcified lesions. Although FNAC is easier to perform, interpretation requires vast experience and even then, it is more often inconclusive requiring additional CNB. The authors conclude that overall CNB is to be preferred as a diagnostic method.",
author = "Willems, {Stefan M.} and {Van Deurzen}, {C. H M} and {Van Diest}, {P. J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200410",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "287--292",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0021-9746",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of breast lesions

T2 - Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review

AU - Willems, Stefan M.

AU - Van Deurzen, C. H M

AU - Van Diest, P. J.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Diagnosis of breast lesions is routinely performed by the triple assessment of a specialised surgeon, radiologist and pathologist. In this setting, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are the current methods of choice for pathological diagnosis, both with their specific advantages and limitations. Evidence-based literature discussing which of both modalities is preferable in breast lesion diagnosis is sparse and there is no consensus among different specialised breast cancer centres. This study reviews FNAC and CNB for diagnosing breast lesions, comparing methodological issues, diagnostic performance indices, possibilities for additional prognostic and predictive tests and cost effectiveness. Overall, CNB achieved better sensitivity and specificity especially in those lesions that were not definitively benign or malignant, non-palpable and/or calcified lesions. Although FNAC is easier to perform, interpretation requires vast experience and even then, it is more often inconclusive requiring additional CNB. The authors conclude that overall CNB is to be preferred as a diagnostic method.

AB - Diagnosis of breast lesions is routinely performed by the triple assessment of a specialised surgeon, radiologist and pathologist. In this setting, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are the current methods of choice for pathological diagnosis, both with their specific advantages and limitations. Evidence-based literature discussing which of both modalities is preferable in breast lesion diagnosis is sparse and there is no consensus among different specialised breast cancer centres. This study reviews FNAC and CNB for diagnosing breast lesions, comparing methodological issues, diagnostic performance indices, possibilities for additional prognostic and predictive tests and cost effectiveness. Overall, CNB achieved better sensitivity and specificity especially in those lesions that were not definitively benign or malignant, non-palpable and/or calcified lesions. Although FNAC is easier to perform, interpretation requires vast experience and even then, it is more often inconclusive requiring additional CNB. The authors conclude that overall CNB is to be preferred as a diagnostic method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858709168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858709168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200410

DO - 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200410

M3 - Article

C2 - 22039282

AN - SCOPUS:84858709168

VL - 65

SP - 287

EP - 292

JO - Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0021-9746

IS - 4

ER -