Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in epidemiologic studies by staged review of clinical data

David C. Steffens, Kathleen A. Welsh, James R. Burke, Michael J. Helms, Marshal F. Folstein, Jason Brandt, William M. McDonald, John C.S. Breitner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We explored the inter-rater agreement and validity of diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias made in an epidemiological study. A previously described protocol for cognitive screening and clinical assessment was applied to a large registry of twins. An expert panel then reviewed results from the assessment of 41 subjects whose screening results suggested the presence of AD. After review of the information at each of four stages of data collection, we assessed inter-rater agreement among the experts as well as their individual agreement with the final consensus diagnosis. We investigated these measures to assess the amount and quality, respectively, of new and diagnostically useful information that was revealed at each stage. A new scheme of weighted differences among the available diagnostic categories was developed for these analyses. As expected, incremental information from successive stages of data collection enabled the panel to increase their diagnostic agreement and rates of 'correct' diagnoses. Over half of the total information was available, however, after review of only the initial telephone screening results (stage 1). A brief standardized videotape segment of the mental status and neurologic examinations provided substantial additional information. We were able to compare the final consensus diagnoses with autopsy results from seven individuals who had consensus clinical diagnoses of Probable or Possible AD (n = 6) or 'demented, questionable etiology' (n = 1). All these subjects had Definite AD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-113
Number of pages7
JournalNeuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1996

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Alzheimer Disease
Consensus
Videotape Recording
Neurologic Examination
Telephone
Dementia
Registries
Autopsy

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Diagnostic agreement
  • Twins
  • Videotape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in epidemiologic studies by staged review of clinical data. / Steffens, David C.; Welsh, Kathleen A.; Burke, James R.; Helms, Michael J.; Folstein, Marshal F.; Brandt, Jason; McDonald, William M.; Breitner, John C.S.

In: Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 04.1996, p. 107-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steffens, David C. ; Welsh, Kathleen A. ; Burke, James R. ; Helms, Michael J. ; Folstein, Marshal F. ; Brandt, Jason ; McDonald, William M. ; Breitner, John C.S. / Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in epidemiologic studies by staged review of clinical data. In: Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 107-113.
@article{af226249436a4cc4a87507cd84a4fd15,
title = "Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in epidemiologic studies by staged review of clinical data",
abstract = "We explored the inter-rater agreement and validity of diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias made in an epidemiological study. A previously described protocol for cognitive screening and clinical assessment was applied to a large registry of twins. An expert panel then reviewed results from the assessment of 41 subjects whose screening results suggested the presence of AD. After review of the information at each of four stages of data collection, we assessed inter-rater agreement among the experts as well as their individual agreement with the final consensus diagnosis. We investigated these measures to assess the amount and quality, respectively, of new and diagnostically useful information that was revealed at each stage. A new scheme of weighted differences among the available diagnostic categories was developed for these analyses. As expected, incremental information from successive stages of data collection enabled the panel to increase their diagnostic agreement and rates of 'correct' diagnoses. Over half of the total information was available, however, after review of only the initial telephone screening results (stage 1). A brief standardized videotape segment of the mental status and neurologic examinations provided substantial additional information. We were able to compare the final consensus diagnoses with autopsy results from seven individuals who had consensus clinical diagnoses of Probable or Possible AD (n = 6) or 'demented, questionable etiology' (n = 1). All these subjects had Definite AD.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Diagnostic agreement, Twins, Videotape",
author = "Steffens, {David C.} and Welsh, {Kathleen A.} and Burke, {James R.} and Helms, {Michael J.} and Folstein, {Marshal F.} and Jason Brandt and McDonald, {William M.} and Breitner, {John C.S.}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "107--113",
journal = "Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology",
issn = "1543-3633",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in epidemiologic studies by staged review of clinical data

AU - Steffens, David C.

AU - Welsh, Kathleen A.

AU - Burke, James R.

AU - Helms, Michael J.

AU - Folstein, Marshal F.

AU - Brandt, Jason

AU - McDonald, William M.

AU - Breitner, John C.S.

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - We explored the inter-rater agreement and validity of diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias made in an epidemiological study. A previously described protocol for cognitive screening and clinical assessment was applied to a large registry of twins. An expert panel then reviewed results from the assessment of 41 subjects whose screening results suggested the presence of AD. After review of the information at each of four stages of data collection, we assessed inter-rater agreement among the experts as well as their individual agreement with the final consensus diagnosis. We investigated these measures to assess the amount and quality, respectively, of new and diagnostically useful information that was revealed at each stage. A new scheme of weighted differences among the available diagnostic categories was developed for these analyses. As expected, incremental information from successive stages of data collection enabled the panel to increase their diagnostic agreement and rates of 'correct' diagnoses. Over half of the total information was available, however, after review of only the initial telephone screening results (stage 1). A brief standardized videotape segment of the mental status and neurologic examinations provided substantial additional information. We were able to compare the final consensus diagnoses with autopsy results from seven individuals who had consensus clinical diagnoses of Probable or Possible AD (n = 6) or 'demented, questionable etiology' (n = 1). All these subjects had Definite AD.

AB - We explored the inter-rater agreement and validity of diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias made in an epidemiological study. A previously described protocol for cognitive screening and clinical assessment was applied to a large registry of twins. An expert panel then reviewed results from the assessment of 41 subjects whose screening results suggested the presence of AD. After review of the information at each of four stages of data collection, we assessed inter-rater agreement among the experts as well as their individual agreement with the final consensus diagnosis. We investigated these measures to assess the amount and quality, respectively, of new and diagnostically useful information that was revealed at each stage. A new scheme of weighted differences among the available diagnostic categories was developed for these analyses. As expected, incremental information from successive stages of data collection enabled the panel to increase their diagnostic agreement and rates of 'correct' diagnoses. Over half of the total information was available, however, after review of only the initial telephone screening results (stage 1). A brief standardized videotape segment of the mental status and neurologic examinations provided substantial additional information. We were able to compare the final consensus diagnoses with autopsy results from seven individuals who had consensus clinical diagnoses of Probable or Possible AD (n = 6) or 'demented, questionable etiology' (n = 1). All these subjects had Definite AD.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Diagnostic agreement

KW - Twins

KW - Videotape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029878346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029878346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 107

EP - 113

JO - Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology

JF - Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology

SN - 1543-3633

IS - 2

ER -