Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language

Edward Munnich, Barbara Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We asked whether there is a developmental decline in the ability to learn the spatial terms of a second language, similar to the age-related decline in mastery of phonology and morphosyntax. Although the semantics of spatial terms may appear to be straightforwardly grounded in spatial cognition and therefore relatively simple, they are known to differ significantly across languages, packaging geometric and functional relationships in different ways, and relying on culture-specific representation of objects. Previous observations suggest that adults learning spatial semantics in a second language do face considerable difficulties (e.g., Ijaz, 1986). To explore why and how learners might find it difficult to learn spatial semantics in a second language, we asked adult native speakers of Spanish and Korean to produce and judge applicability of English spatial prepositions that describe relationships of support, containment, and vertical displacement. The age at which spatial terms were first learned in English (age of immersion) but not years of experience (length of immersion) reliably predicted participants' accuracy, with effects focused on those senses of spatial terms that rely on abstract representation of reference objects. The locus of effects was broadly similar across native Korean and Spanish speakers, suggesting that interference from the first language was not solely responsible for performance. Taken together, these findings suggest maturational constraints on receptivity to spatial semantic input and raise questions about mechanisms that spatial semantic learning may have in common with other areas of language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-59
Number of pages28
JournalLanguage Learning and Development
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

semantics
language
phonology
learning
Language
Spatial Language
cognition
interference
Spatial Terms
ability
performance
experience
Immersion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language. / Munnich, Edward; Landau, Barbara.

In: Language Learning and Development, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 32-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45ff0cb06d544eb2a2fc89c6473d122f,
title = "Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language",
abstract = "We asked whether there is a developmental decline in the ability to learn the spatial terms of a second language, similar to the age-related decline in mastery of phonology and morphosyntax. Although the semantics of spatial terms may appear to be straightforwardly grounded in spatial cognition and therefore relatively simple, they are known to differ significantly across languages, packaging geometric and functional relationships in different ways, and relying on culture-specific representation of objects. Previous observations suggest that adults learning spatial semantics in a second language do face considerable difficulties (e.g., Ijaz, 1986). To explore why and how learners might find it difficult to learn spatial semantics in a second language, we asked adult native speakers of Spanish and Korean to produce and judge applicability of English spatial prepositions that describe relationships of support, containment, and vertical displacement. The age at which spatial terms were first learned in English (age of immersion) but not years of experience (length of immersion) reliably predicted participants' accuracy, with effects focused on those senses of spatial terms that rely on abstract representation of reference objects. The locus of effects was broadly similar across native Korean and Spanish speakers, suggesting that interference from the first language was not solely responsible for performance. Taken together, these findings suggest maturational constraints on receptivity to spatial semantic input and raise questions about mechanisms that spatial semantic learning may have in common with other areas of language.",
author = "Edward Munnich and Barbara Landau",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15475440903249979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "32--59",
journal = "Language Learning and Development",
issn = "1547-5441",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language

AU - Munnich, Edward

AU - Landau, Barbara

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - We asked whether there is a developmental decline in the ability to learn the spatial terms of a second language, similar to the age-related decline in mastery of phonology and morphosyntax. Although the semantics of spatial terms may appear to be straightforwardly grounded in spatial cognition and therefore relatively simple, they are known to differ significantly across languages, packaging geometric and functional relationships in different ways, and relying on culture-specific representation of objects. Previous observations suggest that adults learning spatial semantics in a second language do face considerable difficulties (e.g., Ijaz, 1986). To explore why and how learners might find it difficult to learn spatial semantics in a second language, we asked adult native speakers of Spanish and Korean to produce and judge applicability of English spatial prepositions that describe relationships of support, containment, and vertical displacement. The age at which spatial terms were first learned in English (age of immersion) but not years of experience (length of immersion) reliably predicted participants' accuracy, with effects focused on those senses of spatial terms that rely on abstract representation of reference objects. The locus of effects was broadly similar across native Korean and Spanish speakers, suggesting that interference from the first language was not solely responsible for performance. Taken together, these findings suggest maturational constraints on receptivity to spatial semantic input and raise questions about mechanisms that spatial semantic learning may have in common with other areas of language.

AB - We asked whether there is a developmental decline in the ability to learn the spatial terms of a second language, similar to the age-related decline in mastery of phonology and morphosyntax. Although the semantics of spatial terms may appear to be straightforwardly grounded in spatial cognition and therefore relatively simple, they are known to differ significantly across languages, packaging geometric and functional relationships in different ways, and relying on culture-specific representation of objects. Previous observations suggest that adults learning spatial semantics in a second language do face considerable difficulties (e.g., Ijaz, 1986). To explore why and how learners might find it difficult to learn spatial semantics in a second language, we asked adult native speakers of Spanish and Korean to produce and judge applicability of English spatial prepositions that describe relationships of support, containment, and vertical displacement. The age at which spatial terms were first learned in English (age of immersion) but not years of experience (length of immersion) reliably predicted participants' accuracy, with effects focused on those senses of spatial terms that rely on abstract representation of reference objects. The locus of effects was broadly similar across native Korean and Spanish speakers, suggesting that interference from the first language was not solely responsible for performance. Taken together, these findings suggest maturational constraints on receptivity to spatial semantic input and raise questions about mechanisms that spatial semantic learning may have in common with other areas of language.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952892336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952892336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15475440903249979

DO - 10.1080/15475440903249979

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952892336

VL - 6

SP - 32

EP - 59

JO - Language Learning and Development

JF - Language Learning and Development

SN - 1547-5441

IS - 1

ER -