Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China

Xia Wan, Frances A Stillman, Huilin Liu, Mark Spires, Zhen Dai, Stephen A Tamplin, Daiwei Hu, Jonathan M. Samet, Gonghuan Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To develop an approach for rapid assessment of tobacco control interventions in China. We examined the correlation between components of the Strength of Tobacco Control (SOTC) index and a proposed rapid evaluation indicator, the Policy Performance Indicator (PPI), which is based on protection of non-smokers from secondhand smoke (SHS). The PPI was used to assess the implementation of policies related to SHS at the provincial/municipal level in China. Methods Stratified random sampling was used to select five types of organisational and household respondents in two municipalities and five provinces in China (Shanghai and Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangxi, respectively). Data collection methods included key informant interviews, observation and intercept surveys (organisations), and a modified Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire (households). SOTC scores (SHS policy, capacity and efforts), PPI (no smoking in designated smoke-free places) and mid-term to long-term impact (knowledge, attitude and reduced exposure to SHS) were measured, and correlations among them were calculated. Results The PPI varied across the seven locations. Shanghai led in the component indicators (at 56.5% for indoor workplaces and 49.1% for indoor public places, respectively), followed by Guangdong, Tianjin and Zhejiang (at 30-35% for these two indicators), and finally, Henan and Jiangxi (at 20-25%). Smoke-free policies were more effectively implemented at indoor workplaces than indoor public places. The PPI correlated well with certain components of the SOTC but not with the long-term indicators. Conclusions The PPI is useful for evaluating implementation of smoke-free policies. As tobacco control programmes are implemented, the PPI offers an indicator to track success and change strategies, without collecting data for a full SOTC index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTobacco Control
Volume22
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Policy Making
China
Tobacco
nicotine
performance
Smoke-Free Policy
Workplace
workplace
Smoke
data collection method
Smoking
Observation
Organizations
Interviews
municipality
smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China. / Wan, Xia; Stillman, Frances A; Liu, Huilin; Spires, Mark; Dai, Zhen; Tamplin, Stephen A; Hu, Daiwei; Samet, Jonathan M.; Yang, Gonghuan.

In: Tobacco Control, Vol. 22, No. SUPPL. 2, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wan, Xia ; Stillman, Frances A ; Liu, Huilin ; Spires, Mark ; Dai, Zhen ; Tamplin, Stephen A ; Hu, Daiwei ; Samet, Jonathan M. ; Yang, Gonghuan. / Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China. In: Tobacco Control. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. SUPPL. 2.
@article{ee804237b1fb4e22a03f2ebf469ec3e0,
title = "Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China",
abstract = "Objective To develop an approach for rapid assessment of tobacco control interventions in China. We examined the correlation between components of the Strength of Tobacco Control (SOTC) index and a proposed rapid evaluation indicator, the Policy Performance Indicator (PPI), which is based on protection of non-smokers from secondhand smoke (SHS). The PPI was used to assess the implementation of policies related to SHS at the provincial/municipal level in China. Methods Stratified random sampling was used to select five types of organisational and household respondents in two municipalities and five provinces in China (Shanghai and Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangxi, respectively). Data collection methods included key informant interviews, observation and intercept surveys (organisations), and a modified Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire (households). SOTC scores (SHS policy, capacity and efforts), PPI (no smoking in designated smoke-free places) and mid-term to long-term impact (knowledge, attitude and reduced exposure to SHS) were measured, and correlations among them were calculated. Results The PPI varied across the seven locations. Shanghai led in the component indicators (at 56.5{\%} for indoor workplaces and 49.1{\%} for indoor public places, respectively), followed by Guangdong, Tianjin and Zhejiang (at 30-35{\%} for these two indicators), and finally, Henan and Jiangxi (at 20-25{\%}). Smoke-free policies were more effectively implemented at indoor workplaces than indoor public places. The PPI correlated well with certain components of the SOTC but not with the long-term indicators. Conclusions The PPI is useful for evaluating implementation of smoke-free policies. As tobacco control programmes are implemented, the PPI offers an indicator to track success and change strategies, without collecting data for a full SOTC index.",
author = "Xia Wan and Stillman, {Frances A} and Huilin Liu and Mark Spires and Zhen Dai and Tamplin, {Stephen A} and Daiwei Hu and Samet, {Jonathan M.} and Gonghuan Yang",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050890",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of policy performance indicators to assess the implementation of protection from exposure to secondhand smoke in China

AU - Wan, Xia

AU - Stillman, Frances A

AU - Liu, Huilin

AU - Spires, Mark

AU - Dai, Zhen

AU - Tamplin, Stephen A

AU - Hu, Daiwei

AU - Samet, Jonathan M.

AU - Yang, Gonghuan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective To develop an approach for rapid assessment of tobacco control interventions in China. We examined the correlation between components of the Strength of Tobacco Control (SOTC) index and a proposed rapid evaluation indicator, the Policy Performance Indicator (PPI), which is based on protection of non-smokers from secondhand smoke (SHS). The PPI was used to assess the implementation of policies related to SHS at the provincial/municipal level in China. Methods Stratified random sampling was used to select five types of organisational and household respondents in two municipalities and five provinces in China (Shanghai and Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangxi, respectively). Data collection methods included key informant interviews, observation and intercept surveys (organisations), and a modified Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire (households). SOTC scores (SHS policy, capacity and efforts), PPI (no smoking in designated smoke-free places) and mid-term to long-term impact (knowledge, attitude and reduced exposure to SHS) were measured, and correlations among them were calculated. Results The PPI varied across the seven locations. Shanghai led in the component indicators (at 56.5% for indoor workplaces and 49.1% for indoor public places, respectively), followed by Guangdong, Tianjin and Zhejiang (at 30-35% for these two indicators), and finally, Henan and Jiangxi (at 20-25%). Smoke-free policies were more effectively implemented at indoor workplaces than indoor public places. The PPI correlated well with certain components of the SOTC but not with the long-term indicators. Conclusions The PPI is useful for evaluating implementation of smoke-free policies. As tobacco control programmes are implemented, the PPI offers an indicator to track success and change strategies, without collecting data for a full SOTC index.

AB - Objective To develop an approach for rapid assessment of tobacco control interventions in China. We examined the correlation between components of the Strength of Tobacco Control (SOTC) index and a proposed rapid evaluation indicator, the Policy Performance Indicator (PPI), which is based on protection of non-smokers from secondhand smoke (SHS). The PPI was used to assess the implementation of policies related to SHS at the provincial/municipal level in China. Methods Stratified random sampling was used to select five types of organisational and household respondents in two municipalities and five provinces in China (Shanghai and Tianjin, Heilongjiang, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangxi, respectively). Data collection methods included key informant interviews, observation and intercept surveys (organisations), and a modified Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) questionnaire (households). SOTC scores (SHS policy, capacity and efforts), PPI (no smoking in designated smoke-free places) and mid-term to long-term impact (knowledge, attitude and reduced exposure to SHS) were measured, and correlations among them were calculated. Results The PPI varied across the seven locations. Shanghai led in the component indicators (at 56.5% for indoor workplaces and 49.1% for indoor public places, respectively), followed by Guangdong, Tianjin and Zhejiang (at 30-35% for these two indicators), and finally, Henan and Jiangxi (at 20-25%). Smoke-free policies were more effectively implemented at indoor workplaces than indoor public places. The PPI correlated well with certain components of the SOTC but not with the long-term indicators. Conclusions The PPI is useful for evaluating implementation of smoke-free policies. As tobacco control programmes are implemented, the PPI offers an indicator to track success and change strategies, without collecting data for a full SOTC index.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896143889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896143889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050890

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050890

M3 - Article

C2 - 23760608

AN - SCOPUS:84896143889

VL - 22

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -