Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery

Hemalkumar B. Mehta, Shan Yong, Sneha D. Sura, Byron D. Hughes, Yong Fang Kuo, Stephen B. Williams, Douglas S. Tyler, Taylor S. Riall, James S. Goodwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a claims-based comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery, and compare its performance with established comorbidity scores. Data Source: Five percent Medicare data from 2007 to 2014. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing six major operations (N = 99 250). Data Collection: One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. The comorbidity score was developed in the derivation cohort (70 percent sample) using logistic regression model. The comorbidity score was calibrated and validated in the validation cohort (30 percent sample), and compared against the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (CMS-HCC) comorbidity scores using c-statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. Principal Findings: In the validation cohort, the surgery-specific comorbidity score was well calibrated and performed better than the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC comorbidity scores for all outcomes; the performance was comparable to the CMS-HCC for 30-day readmission. For example, the surgery-specific comorbidity score (c-statistic = 0.792; 95% CI, 0.785-0.799) had greater discrimination than the Charlson (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.739-0.755), Elixhauser (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.735-0.755), or CMS-HCC (c-statistic = 0.755; 95% CI, 0.747-0.763) scores in predicting 1-year mortality. The net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were greater for surgery-specific comorbidity score compared to the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC scores. Conclusions: Compared to commonly used comorbidity measures, a surgery-specific comorbidity score better predicted outcomes in the surgical population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth services research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Comorbidity
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Mortality
Logistic Models
Information Storage and Retrieval
Medicare
Hospital Mortality
Length of Stay
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • comorbidity score
  • confounding
  • risk adjustment
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Mehta, H. B., Yong, S., Sura, S. D., Hughes, B. D., Kuo, Y. F., Williams, S. B., ... Goodwin, J. S. (Accepted/In press). Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery. Health services research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13209

Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery. / Mehta, Hemalkumar B.; Yong, Shan; Sura, Sneha D.; Hughes, Byron D.; Kuo, Yong Fang; Williams, Stephen B.; Tyler, Douglas S.; Riall, Taylor S.; Goodwin, James S.

In: Health services research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mehta, HB, Yong, S, Sura, SD, Hughes, BD, Kuo, YF, Williams, SB, Tyler, DS, Riall, TS & Goodwin, JS 2019, 'Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery', Health services research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13209
Mehta, Hemalkumar B. ; Yong, Shan ; Sura, Sneha D. ; Hughes, Byron D. ; Kuo, Yong Fang ; Williams, Stephen B. ; Tyler, Douglas S. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Goodwin, James S. / Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery. In: Health services research. 2019.
@article{69cff278c14148bfa5109a0661433042,
title = "Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and validate a claims-based comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery, and compare its performance with established comorbidity scores. Data Source: Five percent Medicare data from 2007 to 2014. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing six major operations (N = 99 250). Data Collection: One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. The comorbidity score was developed in the derivation cohort (70 percent sample) using logistic regression model. The comorbidity score was calibrated and validated in the validation cohort (30 percent sample), and compared against the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (CMS-HCC) comorbidity scores using c-statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. Principal Findings: In the validation cohort, the surgery-specific comorbidity score was well calibrated and performed better than the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC comorbidity scores for all outcomes; the performance was comparable to the CMS-HCC for 30-day readmission. For example, the surgery-specific comorbidity score (c-statistic = 0.792; 95{\%} CI, 0.785-0.799) had greater discrimination than the Charlson (c-statistic = 0.747; 95{\%} CI, 0.739-0.755), Elixhauser (c-statistic = 0.747; 95{\%} CI, 0.735-0.755), or CMS-HCC (c-statistic = 0.755; 95{\%} CI, 0.747-0.763) scores in predicting 1-year mortality. The net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were greater for surgery-specific comorbidity score compared to the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC scores. Conclusions: Compared to commonly used comorbidity measures, a surgery-specific comorbidity score better predicted outcomes in the surgical population.",
keywords = "comorbidity score, confounding, risk adjustment, surgery",
author = "Mehta, {Hemalkumar B.} and Shan Yong and Sura, {Sneha D.} and Hughes, {Byron D.} and Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Williams, {Stephen B.} and Tyler, {Douglas S.} and Riall, {Taylor S.} and Goodwin, {James S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.13209",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery

AU - Mehta, Hemalkumar B.

AU - Yong, Shan

AU - Sura, Sneha D.

AU - Hughes, Byron D.

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Williams, Stephen B.

AU - Tyler, Douglas S.

AU - Riall, Taylor S.

AU - Goodwin, James S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To develop and validate a claims-based comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery, and compare its performance with established comorbidity scores. Data Source: Five percent Medicare data from 2007 to 2014. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing six major operations (N = 99 250). Data Collection: One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. The comorbidity score was developed in the derivation cohort (70 percent sample) using logistic regression model. The comorbidity score was calibrated and validated in the validation cohort (30 percent sample), and compared against the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (CMS-HCC) comorbidity scores using c-statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. Principal Findings: In the validation cohort, the surgery-specific comorbidity score was well calibrated and performed better than the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC comorbidity scores for all outcomes; the performance was comparable to the CMS-HCC for 30-day readmission. For example, the surgery-specific comorbidity score (c-statistic = 0.792; 95% CI, 0.785-0.799) had greater discrimination than the Charlson (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.739-0.755), Elixhauser (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.735-0.755), or CMS-HCC (c-statistic = 0.755; 95% CI, 0.747-0.763) scores in predicting 1-year mortality. The net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were greater for surgery-specific comorbidity score compared to the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC scores. Conclusions: Compared to commonly used comorbidity measures, a surgery-specific comorbidity score better predicted outcomes in the surgical population.

AB - Objective: To develop and validate a claims-based comorbidity score for patients undergoing major surgery, and compare its performance with established comorbidity scores. Data Source: Five percent Medicare data from 2007 to 2014. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing six major operations (N = 99 250). Data Collection: One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. The comorbidity score was developed in the derivation cohort (70 percent sample) using logistic regression model. The comorbidity score was calibrated and validated in the validation cohort (30 percent sample), and compared against the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (CMS-HCC) comorbidity scores using c-statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. Principal Findings: In the validation cohort, the surgery-specific comorbidity score was well calibrated and performed better than the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC comorbidity scores for all outcomes; the performance was comparable to the CMS-HCC for 30-day readmission. For example, the surgery-specific comorbidity score (c-statistic = 0.792; 95% CI, 0.785-0.799) had greater discrimination than the Charlson (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.739-0.755), Elixhauser (c-statistic = 0.747; 95% CI, 0.735-0.755), or CMS-HCC (c-statistic = 0.755; 95% CI, 0.747-0.763) scores in predicting 1-year mortality. The net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were greater for surgery-specific comorbidity score compared to the Charlson, Elixhauser, and CMS-HCC scores. Conclusions: Compared to commonly used comorbidity measures, a surgery-specific comorbidity score better predicted outcomes in the surgical population.

KW - comorbidity score

KW - confounding

KW - risk adjustment

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073998211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073998211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.13209

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.13209

M3 - Article

C2 - 31576566

AN - SCOPUS:85073998211

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

ER -