Development of a High-performance Dual-energy Chest Imaging System. Initial Investigation of Diagnostic Performance

Hany Kashani, Jianan Gang, Nicholas A. Shkumat, Carlos A. Varon, John Yorkston, Richard Van Metter, Narinder S. Paul, Jeff Siewerdsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a newly developed dual-energy (DE) chest radiographic system in comparison to digital radiographic (DR) imaging in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. Materials and Methods: An experimental prototype was developed for high-performance DE chest imaging, with total dose equivalent to a single posterior-anterior DR image. Projections at low and high peak kilovoltage were used to decompose DE soft tissue and bone images. A cohort of 55 patients (31 men, 24 women; mean age, 65.6 years) was drawn from an ongoing trial involving patients referred for percutaneous computed tomography-guided biopsy of suspicious lung nodules. DE and DR images were acquired of each patient prior to biopsy. Image quality was assessed by means of human observer tests involving five radiologists independently rating the detection and characterization of lung nodules on a nine-point scale. Results were analyzed in terms of the fraction of cases at or above a given rating, and statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Performance was analyzed for all cases pooled as well as by stratification of nodule size, density, lung region, and chest thickness. Results: The studies demonstrated a significant performance advantage for DE imaging compared to DR imaging (P <.001) in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. DE imaging improved the detection of both small and large nodules and exhibited the most significant improvement in regions of the upper lobes, where overlying anatomic noise (ribs and clavicles) are believed to reduce nodule conspicuity on DR imaging. Conclusions: DE imaging outperformed DR imaging overall, particularly in the detection of small, solid nodules. DE imaging also performed better in regions dominated by anatomic noise, such as the lung apices. The potential for improved nodule detection and characterization at radiation doses equivalent to DR imaging is encouraging and could augment the broader use of DE imaging. Future studies will extend the initial cohort and rating scale tests to a larger cohort evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis and will evaluate DE imaging in comparison and as an adjuvant to low-dose computed tomography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-476
Number of pages13
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thorax
Lung
Noise
Tomography
Biopsy
Clavicle
Ribs
Nonparametric Statistics
ROC Curve
Radiation
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • chest radiography
  • diagnostic radiology
  • Dual-energy imaging
  • flat-panel detector
  • lung cancer
  • pulmonary nodule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Development of a High-performance Dual-energy Chest Imaging System. Initial Investigation of Diagnostic Performance. / Kashani, Hany; Gang, Jianan; Shkumat, Nicholas A.; Varon, Carlos A.; Yorkston, John; Van Metter, Richard; Paul, Narinder S.; Siewerdsen, Jeff.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 464-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kashani, Hany ; Gang, Jianan ; Shkumat, Nicholas A. ; Varon, Carlos A. ; Yorkston, John ; Van Metter, Richard ; Paul, Narinder S. ; Siewerdsen, Jeff. / Development of a High-performance Dual-energy Chest Imaging System. Initial Investigation of Diagnostic Performance. In: Academic Radiology. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 464-476.
@article{c903b4b68c2f4ec5b6d7129955b353d4,
title = "Development of a High-performance Dual-energy Chest Imaging System. Initial Investigation of Diagnostic Performance",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a newly developed dual-energy (DE) chest radiographic system in comparison to digital radiographic (DR) imaging in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. Materials and Methods: An experimental prototype was developed for high-performance DE chest imaging, with total dose equivalent to a single posterior-anterior DR image. Projections at low and high peak kilovoltage were used to decompose DE soft tissue and bone images. A cohort of 55 patients (31 men, 24 women; mean age, 65.6 years) was drawn from an ongoing trial involving patients referred for percutaneous computed tomography-guided biopsy of suspicious lung nodules. DE and DR images were acquired of each patient prior to biopsy. Image quality was assessed by means of human observer tests involving five radiologists independently rating the detection and characterization of lung nodules on a nine-point scale. Results were analyzed in terms of the fraction of cases at or above a given rating, and statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Performance was analyzed for all cases pooled as well as by stratification of nodule size, density, lung region, and chest thickness. Results: The studies demonstrated a significant performance advantage for DE imaging compared to DR imaging (P <.001) in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. DE imaging improved the detection of both small and large nodules and exhibited the most significant improvement in regions of the upper lobes, where overlying anatomic noise (ribs and clavicles) are believed to reduce nodule conspicuity on DR imaging. Conclusions: DE imaging outperformed DR imaging overall, particularly in the detection of small, solid nodules. DE imaging also performed better in regions dominated by anatomic noise, such as the lung apices. The potential for improved nodule detection and characterization at radiation doses equivalent to DR imaging is encouraging and could augment the broader use of DE imaging. Future studies will extend the initial cohort and rating scale tests to a larger cohort evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis and will evaluate DE imaging in comparison and as an adjuvant to low-dose computed tomography.",
keywords = "chest radiography, diagnostic radiology, Dual-energy imaging, flat-panel detector, lung cancer, pulmonary nodule",
author = "Hany Kashani and Jianan Gang and Shkumat, {Nicholas A.} and Varon, {Carlos A.} and John Yorkston and {Van Metter}, Richard and Paul, {Narinder S.} and Jeff Siewerdsen",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "464--476",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a High-performance Dual-energy Chest Imaging System. Initial Investigation of Diagnostic Performance

AU - Kashani, Hany

AU - Gang, Jianan

AU - Shkumat, Nicholas A.

AU - Varon, Carlos A.

AU - Yorkston, John

AU - Van Metter, Richard

AU - Paul, Narinder S.

AU - Siewerdsen, Jeff

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a newly developed dual-energy (DE) chest radiographic system in comparison to digital radiographic (DR) imaging in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. Materials and Methods: An experimental prototype was developed for high-performance DE chest imaging, with total dose equivalent to a single posterior-anterior DR image. Projections at low and high peak kilovoltage were used to decompose DE soft tissue and bone images. A cohort of 55 patients (31 men, 24 women; mean age, 65.6 years) was drawn from an ongoing trial involving patients referred for percutaneous computed tomography-guided biopsy of suspicious lung nodules. DE and DR images were acquired of each patient prior to biopsy. Image quality was assessed by means of human observer tests involving five radiologists independently rating the detection and characterization of lung nodules on a nine-point scale. Results were analyzed in terms of the fraction of cases at or above a given rating, and statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Performance was analyzed for all cases pooled as well as by stratification of nodule size, density, lung region, and chest thickness. Results: The studies demonstrated a significant performance advantage for DE imaging compared to DR imaging (P <.001) in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. DE imaging improved the detection of both small and large nodules and exhibited the most significant improvement in regions of the upper lobes, where overlying anatomic noise (ribs and clavicles) are believed to reduce nodule conspicuity on DR imaging. Conclusions: DE imaging outperformed DR imaging overall, particularly in the detection of small, solid nodules. DE imaging also performed better in regions dominated by anatomic noise, such as the lung apices. The potential for improved nodule detection and characterization at radiation doses equivalent to DR imaging is encouraging and could augment the broader use of DE imaging. Future studies will extend the initial cohort and rating scale tests to a larger cohort evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis and will evaluate DE imaging in comparison and as an adjuvant to low-dose computed tomography.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a newly developed dual-energy (DE) chest radiographic system in comparison to digital radiographic (DR) imaging in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. Materials and Methods: An experimental prototype was developed for high-performance DE chest imaging, with total dose equivalent to a single posterior-anterior DR image. Projections at low and high peak kilovoltage were used to decompose DE soft tissue and bone images. A cohort of 55 patients (31 men, 24 women; mean age, 65.6 years) was drawn from an ongoing trial involving patients referred for percutaneous computed tomography-guided biopsy of suspicious lung nodules. DE and DR images were acquired of each patient prior to biopsy. Image quality was assessed by means of human observer tests involving five radiologists independently rating the detection and characterization of lung nodules on a nine-point scale. Results were analyzed in terms of the fraction of cases at or above a given rating, and statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Performance was analyzed for all cases pooled as well as by stratification of nodule size, density, lung region, and chest thickness. Results: The studies demonstrated a significant performance advantage for DE imaging compared to DR imaging (P <.001) in the detection and characterization of lung nodules. DE imaging improved the detection of both small and large nodules and exhibited the most significant improvement in regions of the upper lobes, where overlying anatomic noise (ribs and clavicles) are believed to reduce nodule conspicuity on DR imaging. Conclusions: DE imaging outperformed DR imaging overall, particularly in the detection of small, solid nodules. DE imaging also performed better in regions dominated by anatomic noise, such as the lung apices. The potential for improved nodule detection and characterization at radiation doses equivalent to DR imaging is encouraging and could augment the broader use of DE imaging. Future studies will extend the initial cohort and rating scale tests to a larger cohort evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis and will evaluate DE imaging in comparison and as an adjuvant to low-dose computed tomography.

KW - chest radiography

KW - diagnostic radiology

KW - Dual-energy imaging

KW - flat-panel detector

KW - lung cancer

KW - pulmonary nodule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61649093839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61649093839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 19268859

AN - SCOPUS:61649093839

VL - 16

SP - 464

EP - 476

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 4

ER -