Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey

Deborah Dang, Dorothy Nyberg, Jo M. Walrath, Miyong T. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although the negative impact of disruptive clinician behavior on quality health care delivery has gained attention recently, little systematic effort to address this issue has been reported. To facilitate empirical research to reduce disruptive clinician behaviors, an assessment tool (Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey [JH-DCBS]) with 5 discrete subscales was developed using a 2-step design. First a pool of items was generated from focus group studies and the literature, and then a psychometric evaluation of the survey was conducted with a sample of clinicians (N = 1198) practicing in a large urban academic medical center. The results indicated that the tool was reliable (Cronbach α =.79-.91), showed high content validity (Content Validity Index =.97), and had significantly high correlations with theoretically selected variables. The study team concluded that the JH-DCBS provides a valid empirical assessment of disruptive behavior. Assessment results may be used to design strategies to improve the health and safety of practice environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-476
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 27 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Empirical Research
Quality of Health Care
Focus Groups
Psychometrics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Problem Behavior
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Health

Keywords

  • disruptive clinician behavior
  • nurse–physician relations
  • patient safety
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey. / Dang, Deborah; Nyberg, Dorothy; Walrath, Jo M.; Kim, Miyong T.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 30, No. 5, 27.09.2015, p. 470-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dang, Deborah ; Nyberg, Dorothy ; Walrath, Jo M. ; Kim, Miyong T. / Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey. In: American Journal of Medical Quality. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 470-476.
@article{fc59c834dc124ee588494b697a53f6fc,
title = "Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey",
abstract = "Although the negative impact of disruptive clinician behavior on quality health care delivery has gained attention recently, little systematic effort to address this issue has been reported. To facilitate empirical research to reduce disruptive clinician behaviors, an assessment tool (Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey [JH-DCBS]) with 5 discrete subscales was developed using a 2-step design. First a pool of items was generated from focus group studies and the literature, and then a psychometric evaluation of the survey was conducted with a sample of clinicians (N = 1198) practicing in a large urban academic medical center. The results indicated that the tool was reliable (Cronbach α =.79-.91), showed high content validity (Content Validity Index =.97), and had significantly high correlations with theoretically selected variables. The study team concluded that the JH-DCBS provides a valid empirical assessment of disruptive behavior. Assessment results may be used to design strategies to improve the health and safety of practice environments.",
keywords = "disruptive clinician behavior, nurse–physician relations, patient safety, survey",
author = "Deborah Dang and Dorothy Nyberg and Walrath, {Jo M.} and Kim, {Miyong T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/1062860614544193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "470--476",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey

AU - Dang, Deborah

AU - Nyberg, Dorothy

AU - Walrath, Jo M.

AU - Kim, Miyong T.

PY - 2015/9/27

Y1 - 2015/9/27

N2 - Although the negative impact of disruptive clinician behavior on quality health care delivery has gained attention recently, little systematic effort to address this issue has been reported. To facilitate empirical research to reduce disruptive clinician behaviors, an assessment tool (Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey [JH-DCBS]) with 5 discrete subscales was developed using a 2-step design. First a pool of items was generated from focus group studies and the literature, and then a psychometric evaluation of the survey was conducted with a sample of clinicians (N = 1198) practicing in a large urban academic medical center. The results indicated that the tool was reliable (Cronbach α =.79-.91), showed high content validity (Content Validity Index =.97), and had significantly high correlations with theoretically selected variables. The study team concluded that the JH-DCBS provides a valid empirical assessment of disruptive behavior. Assessment results may be used to design strategies to improve the health and safety of practice environments.

AB - Although the negative impact of disruptive clinician behavior on quality health care delivery has gained attention recently, little systematic effort to address this issue has been reported. To facilitate empirical research to reduce disruptive clinician behaviors, an assessment tool (Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey [JH-DCBS]) with 5 discrete subscales was developed using a 2-step design. First a pool of items was generated from focus group studies and the literature, and then a psychometric evaluation of the survey was conducted with a sample of clinicians (N = 1198) practicing in a large urban academic medical center. The results indicated that the tool was reliable (Cronbach α =.79-.91), showed high content validity (Content Validity Index =.97), and had significantly high correlations with theoretically selected variables. The study team concluded that the JH-DCBS provides a valid empirical assessment of disruptive behavior. Assessment results may be used to design strategies to improve the health and safety of practice environments.

KW - disruptive clinician behavior

KW - nurse–physician relations

KW - patient safety

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940052996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940052996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860614544193

DO - 10.1177/1062860614544193

M3 - Article

C2 - 25070213

AN - SCOPUS:84940052996

VL - 30

SP - 470

EP - 476

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 5

ER -