Development and quality of life: A critique of Amartya Sen's Development As Freedom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Presented here is a critical analysis of some of the major theses of Amartya Sen, as presented in his seminal work Development As Freedom. The author suggests that Sen's work, while representing a major break with the dominant neoliberal position reproduced in most national and international development agencies, is insufficient to explain the key relationship between freedom and development. The absence of an analysis of the power relations that cause and reproduce underdevelopment through national and international political institutions leaves Sen's work wanting. The author shows how Sen's interpretation of events and the conclusions derived from them, such as an explanation of famine in Bangladesh, are insufficient - when not faulty. The author also critically analyzes the United Nations Development Program reports, which, while documenting the nature and consequences of underdevelopment, barely touch on the political context in which underdevelopment occurs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-674
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Health Services
Volume30
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

underdevelopment
quality of life
Quality of Life
United States Agency for International Development
Bangladesh
United Nations
Starvation
political institution
UNO
interpretation
cause
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Development and quality of life : A critique of Amartya Sen's Development As Freedom. / Navarro, Vicente.

In: International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2000, p. 661-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a81084da21304d8b92ea0b0f00f46c0c,
title = "Development and quality of life: A critique of Amartya Sen's Development As Freedom",
abstract = "Presented here is a critical analysis of some of the major theses of Amartya Sen, as presented in his seminal work Development As Freedom. The author suggests that Sen's work, while representing a major break with the dominant neoliberal position reproduced in most national and international development agencies, is insufficient to explain the key relationship between freedom and development. The absence of an analysis of the power relations that cause and reproduce underdevelopment through national and international political institutions leaves Sen's work wanting. The author shows how Sen's interpretation of events and the conclusions derived from them, such as an explanation of famine in Bangladesh, are insufficient - when not faulty. The author also critically analyzes the United Nations Development Program reports, which, while documenting the nature and consequences of underdevelopment, barely touch on the political context in which underdevelopment occurs.",
author = "Vicente Navarro",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "661--674",
journal = "International Journal of Health Services",
issn = "0020-7314",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and quality of life

T2 - A critique of Amartya Sen's Development As Freedom

AU - Navarro, Vicente

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Presented here is a critical analysis of some of the major theses of Amartya Sen, as presented in his seminal work Development As Freedom. The author suggests that Sen's work, while representing a major break with the dominant neoliberal position reproduced in most national and international development agencies, is insufficient to explain the key relationship between freedom and development. The absence of an analysis of the power relations that cause and reproduce underdevelopment through national and international political institutions leaves Sen's work wanting. The author shows how Sen's interpretation of events and the conclusions derived from them, such as an explanation of famine in Bangladesh, are insufficient - when not faulty. The author also critically analyzes the United Nations Development Program reports, which, while documenting the nature and consequences of underdevelopment, barely touch on the political context in which underdevelopment occurs.

AB - Presented here is a critical analysis of some of the major theses of Amartya Sen, as presented in his seminal work Development As Freedom. The author suggests that Sen's work, while representing a major break with the dominant neoliberal position reproduced in most national and international development agencies, is insufficient to explain the key relationship between freedom and development. The absence of an analysis of the power relations that cause and reproduce underdevelopment through national and international political institutions leaves Sen's work wanting. The author shows how Sen's interpretation of events and the conclusions derived from them, such as an explanation of famine in Bangladesh, are insufficient - when not faulty. The author also critically analyzes the United Nations Development Program reports, which, while documenting the nature and consequences of underdevelopment, barely touch on the political context in which underdevelopment occurs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033715827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033715827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11127016

AN - SCOPUS:0033715827

VL - 30

SP - 661

EP - 674

JO - International Journal of Health Services

JF - International Journal of Health Services

SN - 0020-7314

IS - 4

ER -