Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries

Robert V. O'Toole, Renan Carlos Castillo, Andrew N. Pollak, Ellen J Mackenzie, Michael J. Bosse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In health care, increased emphasis has been placed on patient-centered care, but to our knowledge little work has been conducted to understand the influences on patient satisfaction after surgery for the treatment of severe lower-extremity injury. Our purpose was to analyze how the patient's satisfaction with the outcome correlates with other measures of outcome (clinical, functional, physical impairment, psychological impairment, and pain) and with the sociodemographic characteristics of the patient, the nature of the injury, and the treatment decisions. Methods: Four hundred and sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower-extremity injuries at eight level-I trauma centers were followed prospectively. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify factors correlating with variation in patient self-reported satisfaction at two years after the injury. The outcomes that were tested in the model were pain, range of motion, muscle strength, self-selected walking speed, depression, anxiety, the physical and psychosocial scores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), return to work, and the number of major complications. The patient characteristics that were tested in the model were age, sex, education, poverty status, insurance status, occupation, race, personality profile, and medical comorbidities. Injury severity was tested in the model with use of both the Injury Severity Score and a score reflecting the probability of amputation. The treatment decisions that were tested were amputation versus reconstruction and time to treatment. Results: No patient demographic, treatment, or injury characteristics were found to correlate with patient satisfaction. Only measures of physical function, psychological distress, clinical recovery, and return to work correlated with patient satisfaction at two years. Five of these outcome measures accounted for >35% of the overall variation in patient satisfaction; these were return to work (p <0.05), depression (p <0.05), the physical functioning component of the SIP (p <0.01), self-selected walking speed (p <0.001), and pain intensity (p <0.001). The absence of major complications and less anxiety were marginally significant (p <0.1). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injury is predicted more by function, pain, and the presence of depression at two years than by any underlying characteristic of the patient, injury, or treatment. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1206-1211
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Volume90
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Lower Extremity
Wounds and Injuries
Return to Work
Sickness Impact Profile
Pain
Depression
Amputation
Therapeutics
Anxiety
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Patient-Centered Care
Injury Severity Score
Insurance Coverage
Sex Education
Trauma Centers
Muscle Strength
Poverty
Articular Range of Motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries. / O'Toole, Robert V.; Castillo, Renan Carlos; Pollak, Andrew N.; Mackenzie, Ellen J; Bosse, Michael J.

In: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, Vol. 90, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 1206-1211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca36cf4c0d0b4335813d6033b66782a2,
title = "Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries",
abstract = "Background: In health care, increased emphasis has been placed on patient-centered care, but to our knowledge little work has been conducted to understand the influences on patient satisfaction after surgery for the treatment of severe lower-extremity injury. Our purpose was to analyze how the patient's satisfaction with the outcome correlates with other measures of outcome (clinical, functional, physical impairment, psychological impairment, and pain) and with the sociodemographic characteristics of the patient, the nature of the injury, and the treatment decisions. Methods: Four hundred and sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower-extremity injuries at eight level-I trauma centers were followed prospectively. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify factors correlating with variation in patient self-reported satisfaction at two years after the injury. The outcomes that were tested in the model were pain, range of motion, muscle strength, self-selected walking speed, depression, anxiety, the physical and psychosocial scores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), return to work, and the number of major complications. The patient characteristics that were tested in the model were age, sex, education, poverty status, insurance status, occupation, race, personality profile, and medical comorbidities. Injury severity was tested in the model with use of both the Injury Severity Score and a score reflecting the probability of amputation. The treatment decisions that were tested were amputation versus reconstruction and time to treatment. Results: No patient demographic, treatment, or injury characteristics were found to correlate with patient satisfaction. Only measures of physical function, psychological distress, clinical recovery, and return to work correlated with patient satisfaction at two years. Five of these outcome measures accounted for >35{\%} of the overall variation in patient satisfaction; these were return to work (p <0.05), depression (p <0.05), the physical functioning component of the SIP (p <0.01), self-selected walking speed (p <0.001), and pain intensity (p <0.001). The absence of major complications and less anxiety were marginally significant (p <0.1). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injury is predicted more by function, pain, and the presence of depression at two years than by any underlying characteristic of the patient, injury, or treatment. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "O'Toole, {Robert V.} and Castillo, {Renan Carlos} and Pollak, {Andrew N.} and Mackenzie, {Ellen J} and Bosse, {Michael J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.G.00492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1206--1211",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries

AU - O'Toole, Robert V.

AU - Castillo, Renan Carlos

AU - Pollak, Andrew N.

AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J

AU - Bosse, Michael J.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Background: In health care, increased emphasis has been placed on patient-centered care, but to our knowledge little work has been conducted to understand the influences on patient satisfaction after surgery for the treatment of severe lower-extremity injury. Our purpose was to analyze how the patient's satisfaction with the outcome correlates with other measures of outcome (clinical, functional, physical impairment, psychological impairment, and pain) and with the sociodemographic characteristics of the patient, the nature of the injury, and the treatment decisions. Methods: Four hundred and sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower-extremity injuries at eight level-I trauma centers were followed prospectively. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify factors correlating with variation in patient self-reported satisfaction at two years after the injury. The outcomes that were tested in the model were pain, range of motion, muscle strength, self-selected walking speed, depression, anxiety, the physical and psychosocial scores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), return to work, and the number of major complications. The patient characteristics that were tested in the model were age, sex, education, poverty status, insurance status, occupation, race, personality profile, and medical comorbidities. Injury severity was tested in the model with use of both the Injury Severity Score and a score reflecting the probability of amputation. The treatment decisions that were tested were amputation versus reconstruction and time to treatment. Results: No patient demographic, treatment, or injury characteristics were found to correlate with patient satisfaction. Only measures of physical function, psychological distress, clinical recovery, and return to work correlated with patient satisfaction at two years. Five of these outcome measures accounted for >35% of the overall variation in patient satisfaction; these were return to work (p <0.05), depression (p <0.05), the physical functioning component of the SIP (p <0.01), self-selected walking speed (p <0.001), and pain intensity (p <0.001). The absence of major complications and less anxiety were marginally significant (p <0.1). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injury is predicted more by function, pain, and the presence of depression at two years than by any underlying characteristic of the patient, injury, or treatment. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Background: In health care, increased emphasis has been placed on patient-centered care, but to our knowledge little work has been conducted to understand the influences on patient satisfaction after surgery for the treatment of severe lower-extremity injury. Our purpose was to analyze how the patient's satisfaction with the outcome correlates with other measures of outcome (clinical, functional, physical impairment, psychological impairment, and pain) and with the sociodemographic characteristics of the patient, the nature of the injury, and the treatment decisions. Methods: Four hundred and sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower-extremity injuries at eight level-I trauma centers were followed prospectively. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify factors correlating with variation in patient self-reported satisfaction at two years after the injury. The outcomes that were tested in the model were pain, range of motion, muscle strength, self-selected walking speed, depression, anxiety, the physical and psychosocial scores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), return to work, and the number of major complications. The patient characteristics that were tested in the model were age, sex, education, poverty status, insurance status, occupation, race, personality profile, and medical comorbidities. Injury severity was tested in the model with use of both the Injury Severity Score and a score reflecting the probability of amputation. The treatment decisions that were tested were amputation versus reconstruction and time to treatment. Results: No patient demographic, treatment, or injury characteristics were found to correlate with patient satisfaction. Only measures of physical function, psychological distress, clinical recovery, and return to work correlated with patient satisfaction at two years. Five of these outcome measures accounted for >35% of the overall variation in patient satisfaction; these were return to work (p <0.05), depression (p <0.05), the physical functioning component of the SIP (p <0.01), self-selected walking speed (p <0.001), and pain intensity (p <0.001). The absence of major complications and less anxiety were marginally significant (p <0.1). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injury is predicted more by function, pain, and the presence of depression at two years than by any underlying characteristic of the patient, injury, or treatment. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649135295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649135295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.G.00492

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.G.00492

M3 - Article

C2 - 18519312

AN - SCOPUS:44649135295

VL - 90

SP - 1206

EP - 1211

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 6

ER -