Detection of pulmonary embolism: Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques

Pamela K. Woodard, H. Dirk Sostman, James R. MacFall, David M. DeLong, Josh W. McDonald, Thomas K F Foo, Edward F. Patz, Philip C. Goodman, Charles E. Spritzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compared the conspicuity of acute pulmonary emboli with contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) and two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) techniques. Seven dogs who received experimental pulmonary emboli and one control were imaged with spiral CT and with 2-D (FMPVAS and FASTCARD) and 3-D time-of-flight MR. Blinded, independent, prospective evaluations of the CT and MR images by two MR radiologists and two chest radiologists were then compared to the location of the emboli as determined by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the excised lungs. Embolus/blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated on both MR and CT images for pulmonary emboli that could be identified. Fifty emboli ranging from 1.0 to 5.5 mm (mean, 2.7, ±0.14 SEM) in diameter and from 3.0 to 60 mm (mean, 28.1, ±1.9 SEM) in length were found in the seven embolized dogs on pathologic examination. Three of the four radiologists identified more thrombi on CT images than they did on their best MR pulse sequence (FASTCARD) and with greater confidence. The fourth radiologist identified an equal percentage of clot on CT and FASTCARD images with confidence slightly greater on FASTCARD MR than on spiral CT. Mean CNR for the best MR technique was 43.4 (±3.9 SEM) and for CT was 20.7 (± 1.3 SEM). In general, pulmonary emboli were detected more accurately on contrast-enhanced spiral CT than on MR. This occurred although the embolus/blood CNR was higher on MR than on CT. Better pulmonary embolus conspicuity on CT images was attributed to better spatial resolution and fewer artifacts on CT than on MR. One MR radiologist performed equally well with both spiral CT and FASTCARD techniques, suggesting that experience may be a factor in performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-72
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Thoracic Imaging
Volume10
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Embolism
Tomography
Spiral Computed Tomography
Lung
Noise
Dogs
Artifacts
Thrombosis
Thorax
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Computed tomography, helical technology
  • Magnetic resonance, comparative studies
  • Magnetic resonance, vascular studies
  • Pulmonary arteries, CT
  • Pulmonary arteries, MR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Woodard, P. K., Dirk Sostman, H., MacFall, J. R., DeLong, D. M., McDonald, J. W., Foo, T. K. F., ... Spritzer, C. E. (1995). Detection of pulmonary embolism: Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques. Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 10(1), 59-72.

Detection of pulmonary embolism : Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques. / Woodard, Pamela K.; Dirk Sostman, H.; MacFall, James R.; DeLong, David M.; McDonald, Josh W.; Foo, Thomas K F; Patz, Edward F.; Goodman, Philip C.; Spritzer, Charles E.

In: Journal of Thoracic Imaging, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1995, p. 59-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodard, PK, Dirk Sostman, H, MacFall, JR, DeLong, DM, McDonald, JW, Foo, TKF, Patz, EF, Goodman, PC & Spritzer, CE 1995, 'Detection of pulmonary embolism: Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques', Journal of Thoracic Imaging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59-72.
Woodard PK, Dirk Sostman H, MacFall JR, DeLong DM, McDonald JW, Foo TKF et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism: Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques. Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 1995;10(1):59-72.
Woodard, Pamela K. ; Dirk Sostman, H. ; MacFall, James R. ; DeLong, David M. ; McDonald, Josh W. ; Foo, Thomas K F ; Patz, Edward F. ; Goodman, Philip C. ; Spritzer, Charles E. / Detection of pulmonary embolism : Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques. In: Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 1995 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 59-72.
@article{979de4c9f6ea4f99adbfcaecd4fb9e34,
title = "Detection of pulmonary embolism: Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques",
abstract = "We compared the conspicuity of acute pulmonary emboli with contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) and two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) techniques. Seven dogs who received experimental pulmonary emboli and one control were imaged with spiral CT and with 2-D (FMPVAS and FASTCARD) and 3-D time-of-flight MR. Blinded, independent, prospective evaluations of the CT and MR images by two MR radiologists and two chest radiologists were then compared to the location of the emboli as determined by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the excised lungs. Embolus/blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated on both MR and CT images for pulmonary emboli that could be identified. Fifty emboli ranging from 1.0 to 5.5 mm (mean, 2.7, ±0.14 SEM) in diameter and from 3.0 to 60 mm (mean, 28.1, ±1.9 SEM) in length were found in the seven embolized dogs on pathologic examination. Three of the four radiologists identified more thrombi on CT images than they did on their best MR pulse sequence (FASTCARD) and with greater confidence. The fourth radiologist identified an equal percentage of clot on CT and FASTCARD images with confidence slightly greater on FASTCARD MR than on spiral CT. Mean CNR for the best MR technique was 43.4 (±3.9 SEM) and for CT was 20.7 (± 1.3 SEM). In general, pulmonary emboli were detected more accurately on contrast-enhanced spiral CT than on MR. This occurred although the embolus/blood CNR was higher on MR than on CT. Better pulmonary embolus conspicuity on CT images was attributed to better spatial resolution and fewer artifacts on CT than on MR. One MR radiologist performed equally well with both spiral CT and FASTCARD techniques, suggesting that experience may be a factor in performance.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, helical technology, Magnetic resonance, comparative studies, Magnetic resonance, vascular studies, Pulmonary arteries, CT, Pulmonary arteries, MR",
author = "Woodard, {Pamela K.} and {Dirk Sostman}, H. and MacFall, {James R.} and DeLong, {David M.} and McDonald, {Josh W.} and Foo, {Thomas K F} and Patz, {Edward F.} and Goodman, {Philip C.} and Spritzer, {Charles E.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "59--72",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Imaging",
issn = "0883-5993",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of pulmonary embolism

T2 - Comparison of contrast-enhanced spiral ct and time-of-flight mr techniques

AU - Woodard, Pamela K.

AU - Dirk Sostman, H.

AU - MacFall, James R.

AU - DeLong, David M.

AU - McDonald, Josh W.

AU - Foo, Thomas K F

AU - Patz, Edward F.

AU - Goodman, Philip C.

AU - Spritzer, Charles E.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We compared the conspicuity of acute pulmonary emboli with contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) and two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) techniques. Seven dogs who received experimental pulmonary emboli and one control were imaged with spiral CT and with 2-D (FMPVAS and FASTCARD) and 3-D time-of-flight MR. Blinded, independent, prospective evaluations of the CT and MR images by two MR radiologists and two chest radiologists were then compared to the location of the emboli as determined by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the excised lungs. Embolus/blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated on both MR and CT images for pulmonary emboli that could be identified. Fifty emboli ranging from 1.0 to 5.5 mm (mean, 2.7, ±0.14 SEM) in diameter and from 3.0 to 60 mm (mean, 28.1, ±1.9 SEM) in length were found in the seven embolized dogs on pathologic examination. Three of the four radiologists identified more thrombi on CT images than they did on their best MR pulse sequence (FASTCARD) and with greater confidence. The fourth radiologist identified an equal percentage of clot on CT and FASTCARD images with confidence slightly greater on FASTCARD MR than on spiral CT. Mean CNR for the best MR technique was 43.4 (±3.9 SEM) and for CT was 20.7 (± 1.3 SEM). In general, pulmonary emboli were detected more accurately on contrast-enhanced spiral CT than on MR. This occurred although the embolus/blood CNR was higher on MR than on CT. Better pulmonary embolus conspicuity on CT images was attributed to better spatial resolution and fewer artifacts on CT than on MR. One MR radiologist performed equally well with both spiral CT and FASTCARD techniques, suggesting that experience may be a factor in performance.

AB - We compared the conspicuity of acute pulmonary emboli with contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) and two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) techniques. Seven dogs who received experimental pulmonary emboli and one control were imaged with spiral CT and with 2-D (FMPVAS and FASTCARD) and 3-D time-of-flight MR. Blinded, independent, prospective evaluations of the CT and MR images by two MR radiologists and two chest radiologists were then compared to the location of the emboli as determined by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the excised lungs. Embolus/blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated on both MR and CT images for pulmonary emboli that could be identified. Fifty emboli ranging from 1.0 to 5.5 mm (mean, 2.7, ±0.14 SEM) in diameter and from 3.0 to 60 mm (mean, 28.1, ±1.9 SEM) in length were found in the seven embolized dogs on pathologic examination. Three of the four radiologists identified more thrombi on CT images than they did on their best MR pulse sequence (FASTCARD) and with greater confidence. The fourth radiologist identified an equal percentage of clot on CT and FASTCARD images with confidence slightly greater on FASTCARD MR than on spiral CT. Mean CNR for the best MR technique was 43.4 (±3.9 SEM) and for CT was 20.7 (± 1.3 SEM). In general, pulmonary emboli were detected more accurately on contrast-enhanced spiral CT than on MR. This occurred although the embolus/blood CNR was higher on MR than on CT. Better pulmonary embolus conspicuity on CT images was attributed to better spatial resolution and fewer artifacts on CT than on MR. One MR radiologist performed equally well with both spiral CT and FASTCARD techniques, suggesting that experience may be a factor in performance.

KW - Computed tomography, helical technology

KW - Magnetic resonance, comparative studies

KW - Magnetic resonance, vascular studies

KW - Pulmonary arteries, CT

KW - Pulmonary arteries, MR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028888631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028888631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7891398

AN - SCOPUS:0028888631

VL - 10

SP - 59

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

JF - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

SN - 0883-5993

IS - 1

ER -