Detection of diabetic macular edema: Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy

A. Kiri, D. S. Dyer, Neil M Bressler, Susan B Bressler, A. P. Schachat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the use of the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous stereophotography camera in diabetic patients, comparing the detection of clinically significant macular edema by fundus biomicroscopy to detection by the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous fundus stereophotograph. METHODS: Two hundred eight eyes of 123 diabetic patients at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Center were examined for this prospective study between August 1993 and October 1993. Each patient was examined by one of three retina specialists by contact lens biomicroscopy for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening. Nidek 3Dx fundus stereophotographs were obtained and graded independently for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening by a fourth ophthalmologist masked from the clinical examination findings. Percent agreement, kappa statistic, and weighted kappa statistic were determined for the two diagnostic methods. RESULTS: One hundred eighty- four (88%) of the 208 stereophotographs were of sufficient quality to detect clinically significant macular edema; 175 (84%) of the 208 stereophotographs detected foveal center thickening. The agreement between the clinician and the photographic grading, measured by weighted kappa, was 0.52 for clinically significant macular edema and 0.58 for foveal center thickening, representing fair to good agreement beyond chance. Agreement was improved when normal fundus Nidek stereophotographs were available as standards for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The Nidek 3Dx camera is suitable for photographic detection of clinically significant macular edema and may have a potential advantage over conventional cameras by achieving good-quality, gradable stereophotographs in a large proportion of photographed eyes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)654-662
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume122
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Macular Edema
Retinal Vessels
Contact Lenses
Retina
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Detection of diabetic macular edema : Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy. / Kiri, A.; Dyer, D. S.; Bressler, Neil M; Bressler, Susan B; Schachat, A. P.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 122, No. 5, 1996, p. 654-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ddd3d9c098e4864b5a787b0ab705dd7,
title = "Detection of diabetic macular edema: Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess the use of the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous stereophotography camera in diabetic patients, comparing the detection of clinically significant macular edema by fundus biomicroscopy to detection by the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous fundus stereophotograph. METHODS: Two hundred eight eyes of 123 diabetic patients at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Center were examined for this prospective study between August 1993 and October 1993. Each patient was examined by one of three retina specialists by contact lens biomicroscopy for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening. Nidek 3Dx fundus stereophotographs were obtained and graded independently for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening by a fourth ophthalmologist masked from the clinical examination findings. Percent agreement, kappa statistic, and weighted kappa statistic were determined for the two diagnostic methods. RESULTS: One hundred eighty- four (88{\%}) of the 208 stereophotographs were of sufficient quality to detect clinically significant macular edema; 175 (84{\%}) of the 208 stereophotographs detected foveal center thickening. The agreement between the clinician and the photographic grading, measured by weighted kappa, was 0.52 for clinically significant macular edema and 0.58 for foveal center thickening, representing fair to good agreement beyond chance. Agreement was improved when normal fundus Nidek stereophotographs were available as standards for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The Nidek 3Dx camera is suitable for photographic detection of clinically significant macular edema and may have a potential advantage over conventional cameras by achieving good-quality, gradable stereophotographs in a large proportion of photographed eyes.",
author = "A. Kiri and Dyer, {D. S.} and Bressler, {Neil M} and Bressler, {Susan B} and Schachat, {A. P.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "654--662",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of diabetic macular edema

T2 - Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy

AU - Kiri, A.

AU - Dyer, D. S.

AU - Bressler, Neil M

AU - Bressler, Susan B

AU - Schachat, A. P.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the use of the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous stereophotography camera in diabetic patients, comparing the detection of clinically significant macular edema by fundus biomicroscopy to detection by the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous fundus stereophotograph. METHODS: Two hundred eight eyes of 123 diabetic patients at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Center were examined for this prospective study between August 1993 and October 1993. Each patient was examined by one of three retina specialists by contact lens biomicroscopy for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening. Nidek 3Dx fundus stereophotographs were obtained and graded independently for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening by a fourth ophthalmologist masked from the clinical examination findings. Percent agreement, kappa statistic, and weighted kappa statistic were determined for the two diagnostic methods. RESULTS: One hundred eighty- four (88%) of the 208 stereophotographs were of sufficient quality to detect clinically significant macular edema; 175 (84%) of the 208 stereophotographs detected foveal center thickening. The agreement between the clinician and the photographic grading, measured by weighted kappa, was 0.52 for clinically significant macular edema and 0.58 for foveal center thickening, representing fair to good agreement beyond chance. Agreement was improved when normal fundus Nidek stereophotographs were available as standards for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The Nidek 3Dx camera is suitable for photographic detection of clinically significant macular edema and may have a potential advantage over conventional cameras by achieving good-quality, gradable stereophotographs in a large proportion of photographed eyes.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess the use of the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous stereophotography camera in diabetic patients, comparing the detection of clinically significant macular edema by fundus biomicroscopy to detection by the Nidek 3Dx simultaneous fundus stereophotograph. METHODS: Two hundred eight eyes of 123 diabetic patients at the Wilmer Retinal Vascular Center were examined for this prospective study between August 1993 and October 1993. Each patient was examined by one of three retina specialists by contact lens biomicroscopy for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening. Nidek 3Dx fundus stereophotographs were obtained and graded independently for clinically significant macular edema and foveal center thickening by a fourth ophthalmologist masked from the clinical examination findings. Percent agreement, kappa statistic, and weighted kappa statistic were determined for the two diagnostic methods. RESULTS: One hundred eighty- four (88%) of the 208 stereophotographs were of sufficient quality to detect clinically significant macular edema; 175 (84%) of the 208 stereophotographs detected foveal center thickening. The agreement between the clinician and the photographic grading, measured by weighted kappa, was 0.52 for clinically significant macular edema and 0.58 for foveal center thickening, representing fair to good agreement beyond chance. Agreement was improved when normal fundus Nidek stereophotographs were available as standards for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The Nidek 3Dx camera is suitable for photographic detection of clinically significant macular edema and may have a potential advantage over conventional cameras by achieving good-quality, gradable stereophotographs in a large proportion of photographed eyes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029824013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029824013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8909204

AN - SCOPUS:0029824013

VL - 122

SP - 654

EP - 662

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 5

ER -