Despite severe imposed astigmatic blur, chicks compensate for spectacle lenses

Rhondalyn C. McLean, Josh Wallman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Is compensation for spectacle lenses simply a special case of deprivation myopia? Using lenses with +5D in one meridian and -5D in the other (OD mean spherical power), we imposed defocus that could not be cleared by accommodation. We asked whether these lenses, like diffusers, would cause myopia and whether they would prevent lens compensation. Methods: Cornell K chicks were fitted at day 6 with these astigmatic lenses oriented with the rule, against the rule or at 45 degrees. These lenses were also combined with +6D and -6D spherical lenses. Refractive error of anesthetized chicks was measured with a Hartinger refractometer. Results: With the +5D/-5D lenses alone, there is a statistically significant trend in the hyperopic direction, in all three lens orientations. With the combined lenses compensation was unimpaired. Conclusions: Despite the lack of clear images, chicks compensate for both hyperopic blur (negative lenses) and myopic blur (positive 4 lenses). Astigmatic defocus alone caused eyes to grow toward hvoerooia. instead of towards myopia as predicted by the form-deprivation hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume38
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lenses
Myopia
Meridians
Refractive Errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Despite severe imposed astigmatic blur, chicks compensate for spectacle lenses. / McLean, Rhondalyn C.; Wallman, Josh.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e262a5126cf048058d6182d1afca1086,
title = "Despite severe imposed astigmatic blur, chicks compensate for spectacle lenses",
abstract = "Purpose: Is compensation for spectacle lenses simply a special case of deprivation myopia? Using lenses with +5D in one meridian and -5D in the other (OD mean spherical power), we imposed defocus that could not be cleared by accommodation. We asked whether these lenses, like diffusers, would cause myopia and whether they would prevent lens compensation. Methods: Cornell K chicks were fitted at day 6 with these astigmatic lenses oriented with the rule, against the rule or at 45 degrees. These lenses were also combined with +6D and -6D spherical lenses. Refractive error of anesthetized chicks was measured with a Hartinger refractometer. Results: With the +5D/-5D lenses alone, there is a statistically significant trend in the hyperopic direction, in all three lens orientations. With the combined lenses compensation was unimpaired. Conclusions: Despite the lack of clear images, chicks compensate for both hyperopic blur (negative lenses) and myopic blur (positive 4 lenses). Astigmatic defocus alone caused eyes to grow toward hvoerooia. instead of towards myopia as predicted by the form-deprivation hypothesis.",
author = "McLean, {Rhondalyn C.} and Josh Wallman",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Despite severe imposed astigmatic blur, chicks compensate for spectacle lenses

AU - McLean, Rhondalyn C.

AU - Wallman, Josh

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Purpose: Is compensation for spectacle lenses simply a special case of deprivation myopia? Using lenses with +5D in one meridian and -5D in the other (OD mean spherical power), we imposed defocus that could not be cleared by accommodation. We asked whether these lenses, like diffusers, would cause myopia and whether they would prevent lens compensation. Methods: Cornell K chicks were fitted at day 6 with these astigmatic lenses oriented with the rule, against the rule or at 45 degrees. These lenses were also combined with +6D and -6D spherical lenses. Refractive error of anesthetized chicks was measured with a Hartinger refractometer. Results: With the +5D/-5D lenses alone, there is a statistically significant trend in the hyperopic direction, in all three lens orientations. With the combined lenses compensation was unimpaired. Conclusions: Despite the lack of clear images, chicks compensate for both hyperopic blur (negative lenses) and myopic blur (positive 4 lenses). Astigmatic defocus alone caused eyes to grow toward hvoerooia. instead of towards myopia as predicted by the form-deprivation hypothesis.

AB - Purpose: Is compensation for spectacle lenses simply a special case of deprivation myopia? Using lenses with +5D in one meridian and -5D in the other (OD mean spherical power), we imposed defocus that could not be cleared by accommodation. We asked whether these lenses, like diffusers, would cause myopia and whether they would prevent lens compensation. Methods: Cornell K chicks were fitted at day 6 with these astigmatic lenses oriented with the rule, against the rule or at 45 degrees. These lenses were also combined with +6D and -6D spherical lenses. Refractive error of anesthetized chicks was measured with a Hartinger refractometer. Results: With the +5D/-5D lenses alone, there is a statistically significant trend in the hyperopic direction, in all three lens orientations. With the combined lenses compensation was unimpaired. Conclusions: Despite the lack of clear images, chicks compensate for both hyperopic blur (negative lenses) and myopic blur (positive 4 lenses). Astigmatic defocus alone caused eyes to grow toward hvoerooia. instead of towards myopia as predicted by the form-deprivation hypothesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000685659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000685659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000685659

VL - 38

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 4

ER -