Designing interoperable health information systems using Enterprise Architecture approach in resource-limited countries: A literature review

Susan Higman, Vikas Dwivedi, Alpha Nsaghurwe, Moses Busiga, Hermes Sotter Rulagirwa, Dasha Smith, Chris Wright, Ssanyu Nyinondi, Edwin Nyella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Enterprise Architecture (EA) integrates business and technical processes in health information systems (HIS). Low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) use EA to combine management components with disease tracking and health care service monitoring. Using an EA approach differs by country, addressing specific needs. Methods: Articles in this review referenced EA, were peer-reviewed or gray literature reports published in 2010 to 2016 in English, and were identified using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Results: Fourteen articles described EA use in LMICs. India, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Mozambique, and Rwanda reported building the system to meet country needs and implement a cohesive HIS framework. Jordan and Taiwan focused on specific HIS aspects, ie, disease surveillance and electronic medical records. Five studies informed the context. The Millennium Villages Project employed a “uniform but contextualized” approach to guide systems in 10 countries; Malaysia, Indonesia, and Tanzania used interviews and mapping of existing components to improve HIS, and Namibia used of Activity Theory to identify technology-associated activities to better understand EA frameworks. South Africa, Burundi, Kenya, and Democratic Republic of Congo used EA to move from paper-based to electronic systems. Conclusions: Four themes emerged: the importance of multiple sectors and data sources, the need for interoperability, the ability to incorporate system flexibility, and the desirability of open group models, data standards, and software. Themes mapped to EA frameworks and operational components and to health system building blocks and goals. Most articles focused on processes rather than outcomes, as countries are engaged in implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Health Planning and Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Information Systems
South Africa
Burundi
Sierra Leone
Namibia
Rwanda
Mozambique
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Jordan
Indonesia
Tanzania
Electronic Health Records
Information Storage and Retrieval
Kenya
Malaysia
Taiwan
PubMed
Health Services
India
Software

Keywords

  • design of health information systems
  • health information systems
  • health systems building blocks
  • information
  • interoperability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Designing interoperable health information systems using Enterprise Architecture approach in resource-limited countries : A literature review. / Higman, Susan; Dwivedi, Vikas; Nsaghurwe, Alpha; Busiga, Moses; Sotter Rulagirwa, Hermes; Smith, Dasha; Wright, Chris; Nyinondi, Ssanyu; Nyella, Edwin.

In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Higman, Susan ; Dwivedi, Vikas ; Nsaghurwe, Alpha ; Busiga, Moses ; Sotter Rulagirwa, Hermes ; Smith, Dasha ; Wright, Chris ; Nyinondi, Ssanyu ; Nyella, Edwin. / Designing interoperable health information systems using Enterprise Architecture approach in resource-limited countries : A literature review. In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2018.
@article{81a51e611d024c9a95e3f914bc16ad58,
title = "Designing interoperable health information systems using Enterprise Architecture approach in resource-limited countries: A literature review",
abstract = "Background: Enterprise Architecture (EA) integrates business and technical processes in health information systems (HIS). Low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) use EA to combine management components with disease tracking and health care service monitoring. Using an EA approach differs by country, addressing specific needs. Methods: Articles in this review referenced EA, were peer-reviewed or gray literature reports published in 2010 to 2016 in English, and were identified using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Results: Fourteen articles described EA use in LMICs. India, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Mozambique, and Rwanda reported building the system to meet country needs and implement a cohesive HIS framework. Jordan and Taiwan focused on specific HIS aspects, ie, disease surveillance and electronic medical records. Five studies informed the context. The Millennium Villages Project employed a “uniform but contextualized” approach to guide systems in 10 countries; Malaysia, Indonesia, and Tanzania used interviews and mapping of existing components to improve HIS, and Namibia used of Activity Theory to identify technology-associated activities to better understand EA frameworks. South Africa, Burundi, Kenya, and Democratic Republic of Congo used EA to move from paper-based to electronic systems. Conclusions: Four themes emerged: the importance of multiple sectors and data sources, the need for interoperability, the ability to incorporate system flexibility, and the desirability of open group models, data standards, and software. Themes mapped to EA frameworks and operational components and to health system building blocks and goals. Most articles focused on processes rather than outcomes, as countries are engaged in implementation.",
keywords = "design of health information systems, health information systems, health systems building blocks, information, interoperability",
author = "Susan Higman and Vikas Dwivedi and Alpha Nsaghurwe and Moses Busiga and {Sotter Rulagirwa}, Hermes and Dasha Smith and Chris Wright and Ssanyu Nyinondi and Edwin Nyella",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hpm.2634",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Health Planning and Management",
issn = "0749-6753",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing interoperable health information systems using Enterprise Architecture approach in resource-limited countries

T2 - A literature review

AU - Higman, Susan

AU - Dwivedi, Vikas

AU - Nsaghurwe, Alpha

AU - Busiga, Moses

AU - Sotter Rulagirwa, Hermes

AU - Smith, Dasha

AU - Wright, Chris

AU - Nyinondi, Ssanyu

AU - Nyella, Edwin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Enterprise Architecture (EA) integrates business and technical processes in health information systems (HIS). Low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) use EA to combine management components with disease tracking and health care service monitoring. Using an EA approach differs by country, addressing specific needs. Methods: Articles in this review referenced EA, were peer-reviewed or gray literature reports published in 2010 to 2016 in English, and were identified using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Results: Fourteen articles described EA use in LMICs. India, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Mozambique, and Rwanda reported building the system to meet country needs and implement a cohesive HIS framework. Jordan and Taiwan focused on specific HIS aspects, ie, disease surveillance and electronic medical records. Five studies informed the context. The Millennium Villages Project employed a “uniform but contextualized” approach to guide systems in 10 countries; Malaysia, Indonesia, and Tanzania used interviews and mapping of existing components to improve HIS, and Namibia used of Activity Theory to identify technology-associated activities to better understand EA frameworks. South Africa, Burundi, Kenya, and Democratic Republic of Congo used EA to move from paper-based to electronic systems. Conclusions: Four themes emerged: the importance of multiple sectors and data sources, the need for interoperability, the ability to incorporate system flexibility, and the desirability of open group models, data standards, and software. Themes mapped to EA frameworks and operational components and to health system building blocks and goals. Most articles focused on processes rather than outcomes, as countries are engaged in implementation.

AB - Background: Enterprise Architecture (EA) integrates business and technical processes in health information systems (HIS). Low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) use EA to combine management components with disease tracking and health care service monitoring. Using an EA approach differs by country, addressing specific needs. Methods: Articles in this review referenced EA, were peer-reviewed or gray literature reports published in 2010 to 2016 in English, and were identified using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Results: Fourteen articles described EA use in LMICs. India, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Mozambique, and Rwanda reported building the system to meet country needs and implement a cohesive HIS framework. Jordan and Taiwan focused on specific HIS aspects, ie, disease surveillance and electronic medical records. Five studies informed the context. The Millennium Villages Project employed a “uniform but contextualized” approach to guide systems in 10 countries; Malaysia, Indonesia, and Tanzania used interviews and mapping of existing components to improve HIS, and Namibia used of Activity Theory to identify technology-associated activities to better understand EA frameworks. South Africa, Burundi, Kenya, and Democratic Republic of Congo used EA to move from paper-based to electronic systems. Conclusions: Four themes emerged: the importance of multiple sectors and data sources, the need for interoperability, the ability to incorporate system flexibility, and the desirability of open group models, data standards, and software. Themes mapped to EA frameworks and operational components and to health system building blocks and goals. Most articles focused on processes rather than outcomes, as countries are engaged in implementation.

KW - design of health information systems

KW - health information systems

KW - health systems building blocks

KW - information

KW - interoperability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052933481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052933481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpm.2634

DO - 10.1002/hpm.2634

M3 - Article

C2 - 30182517

AN - SCOPUS:85052933481

JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

SN - 0749-6753

ER -