Design of a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial of transplantation using umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical related bone marrow in advanced hematologic cancer

Joshua A. Roth, Mark E. Bensink, Paul V. Odonnell, Ephraim J. Fuchs, Mary Eapen, Scott D. Ramsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: BMT CTN 1101 is a Phase III randomized controlled trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of double unrelated umbilical cord blood (dUCB) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow (haplo-BM) donor cell sources for blood or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Herein, we present the rationale, design and methods of the first cost-effectiveness analysis to be conducted alongside a BMT trial. Methods: Consenting patients will provide health insurance information to allow calculation of direct medical costs from reimbursement records, and will provide out-of-pocket costs, time costs and health-related quality of life measures through an online survey. These outcomes will inform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing dUCB and haplo-BM donor cell sources from patient, payer and societal perspectives. Conclusion: Novel approaches may significantly change the cost, outcomes or availability of BMT. The results of this analysis will be the first to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of these approaches from multiple perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-144
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Phase III
  • blood and bone marrow transplant
  • cost-effectiveness
  • randomized controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Design of a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial of transplantation using umbilical cord blood versus HLA-haploidentical related bone marrow in advanced hematologic cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this