Design features of randomized clinical trials of vitamin D and falls: A systematic review

Olive Tang, Stephen P. Juraschek, Lawrence J. Appel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent guidelines have advocated against the use of vitamin D supplementation as a means to prevent falls in older adults. However, meta-analyses of the available trials have reached divergent conclusions, and the key design features of these trials have not been well characterized. We conducted a systematic review of 30 randomized trials that reported the effects of vitamin D supplements on falls. Trials were identified by reviewing references of published meta-analyses and updated with a systematic PubMed search. We assessed three key design features: (1) recruitment of participants with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency; (2) provision of daily oral vitamin D supplementation; and (3) utilization of highly sensitive at-event falls ascertainment. The trials enrolled a median of 337 (IQR: 170-1864) participants. Four (13.3%) trials restricted enrollment to those who were at least vitamin D insufficient, 18 (60.0%) included at least one arm providing daily supplementation, and 16 (53.3%) used at-event reporting. There was substantial heterogeneity between trials, and no single trial incorporated all three key design features. Rather than concluding that vitamin D is ineffective as a means to prevent falls, these findings suggest that existing trial evidence is insufficient to guide recommendations on the use of vitamin D supplements to prevent falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number964
JournalNutrients
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Falls prevention
  • Trials
  • Vitamin D

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Design features of randomized clinical trials of vitamin D and falls: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this