Design and reporting modifications in industry-sponsored comparative psychopharmacology trials

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This review of recently published pharmaceutical industry-sponsored comparative psychotropic drug trials aims to classify apparent design and reporting modifications that favor the sponsor's product. The modifications have been grouped into 13 discrete categories, and representative examples of each are presented. Strong circumstantial evidence suggests that marketing goals led to these adjustments. The consequences of marketing influences on comparative psychopharmacology trials are discussed in terms of conflicts of interest, the integrity of the scientific literature, and costs to consumers, as well as their impact on physician practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-592
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume190
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Design and reporting modifications in industry-sponsored comparative psychopharmacology trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this