Describing a "mass shooting": The role of databases in understanding burden

Marisa Booty, Jayne O'Dwyer, Daniel Webster, Alex McCourt, Cassandra Crifasi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The mass shooting phenomenon has gained much attention lately as this form of gun violence appears to increase in frequency. Although many organizations collect information on mass shootings (fatal and nonfatal injuries), no federal definition of this phrase exists. The purpose of this study was to highlight the different statistics that result among databases that define and track "mass shootings." Establishing definitive guidelines for a mass shooting definition could improve research credibility when presenting evidence to policy makers. Methods: We obtained data for mass shootings that occurred in 2017 from four sources: Gun Violence Archive, Mother Jones Investigation, Everytown for Gun Safety, and FBI's Supplemental Homicide Report. We also examined FBI's Active Shooter Report to compare the mass shootings datasets with active shooter situations, which have been federally defined. First, we examined the overlap among databases. Then, we applied the strictest fatal mass shooting definition to the mass shooting datasets to determine whether the differences in databases could be contributing to differences in fatalities and injuries recorded. Results: Gun Violence Archive recorded the most mass shooting incidents at 346 incidents in 2017, while Mother Jones only recorded 11 cases. Only 2 events were found in all four mass shooting datasets. When the strictest definition-four or more individuals fatally shot-was applied to all datasets, the number of mass shootings in 2017 ranged from 24 (Gun Violence Archive) to 5 (Mother Jones), but incidents collected still varied. Conclusions: There is much variety in statistics obtained from the different sources that have collected mass shooting information, with little overlap among databases. Researchers should advocate for a standard definition that considers both fatalities and nonfatalities to most appropriately convey the burden of mass shootings on gun violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number47
JournalInjury Epidemiology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 3 2019

Fingerprint

Firearms
Violence
Databases
Mothers
Homicide
Wounds and Injuries
Administrative Personnel
Research Personnel
Organizations
Guidelines
Safety
Datasets
Research

Keywords

  • Firearms
  • Gun violence
  • Mass shootings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Describing a "mass shooting" : The role of databases in understanding burden. / Booty, Marisa; O'Dwyer, Jayne; Webster, Daniel; McCourt, Alex; Crifasi, Cassandra.

In: Injury Epidemiology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 47, 03.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Booty, Marisa ; O'Dwyer, Jayne ; Webster, Daniel ; McCourt, Alex ; Crifasi, Cassandra. / Describing a "mass shooting" : The role of databases in understanding burden. In: Injury Epidemiology. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{5517f557ee3f4bd2bb0447d293dddb52,
title = "Describing a {"}mass shooting{"}: The role of databases in understanding burden",
abstract = "Background: The mass shooting phenomenon has gained much attention lately as this form of gun violence appears to increase in frequency. Although many organizations collect information on mass shootings (fatal and nonfatal injuries), no federal definition of this phrase exists. The purpose of this study was to highlight the different statistics that result among databases that define and track {"}mass shootings.{"} Establishing definitive guidelines for a mass shooting definition could improve research credibility when presenting evidence to policy makers. Methods: We obtained data for mass shootings that occurred in 2017 from four sources: Gun Violence Archive, Mother Jones Investigation, Everytown for Gun Safety, and FBI's Supplemental Homicide Report. We also examined FBI's Active Shooter Report to compare the mass shootings datasets with active shooter situations, which have been federally defined. First, we examined the overlap among databases. Then, we applied the strictest fatal mass shooting definition to the mass shooting datasets to determine whether the differences in databases could be contributing to differences in fatalities and injuries recorded. Results: Gun Violence Archive recorded the most mass shooting incidents at 346 incidents in 2017, while Mother Jones only recorded 11 cases. Only 2 events were found in all four mass shooting datasets. When the strictest definition-four or more individuals fatally shot-was applied to all datasets, the number of mass shootings in 2017 ranged from 24 (Gun Violence Archive) to 5 (Mother Jones), but incidents collected still varied. Conclusions: There is much variety in statistics obtained from the different sources that have collected mass shooting information, with little overlap among databases. Researchers should advocate for a standard definition that considers both fatalities and nonfatalities to most appropriately convey the burden of mass shootings on gun violence.",
keywords = "Firearms, Gun violence, Mass shootings",
author = "Marisa Booty and Jayne O'Dwyer and Daniel Webster and Alex McCourt and Cassandra Crifasi",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/s40621-019-0226-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Injury Epidemiology",
issn = "2197-1714",
publisher = "SpringerOpen",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Describing a "mass shooting"

T2 - The role of databases in understanding burden

AU - Booty, Marisa

AU - O'Dwyer, Jayne

AU - Webster, Daniel

AU - McCourt, Alex

AU - Crifasi, Cassandra

PY - 2019/12/3

Y1 - 2019/12/3

N2 - Background: The mass shooting phenomenon has gained much attention lately as this form of gun violence appears to increase in frequency. Although many organizations collect information on mass shootings (fatal and nonfatal injuries), no federal definition of this phrase exists. The purpose of this study was to highlight the different statistics that result among databases that define and track "mass shootings." Establishing definitive guidelines for a mass shooting definition could improve research credibility when presenting evidence to policy makers. Methods: We obtained data for mass shootings that occurred in 2017 from four sources: Gun Violence Archive, Mother Jones Investigation, Everytown for Gun Safety, and FBI's Supplemental Homicide Report. We also examined FBI's Active Shooter Report to compare the mass shootings datasets with active shooter situations, which have been federally defined. First, we examined the overlap among databases. Then, we applied the strictest fatal mass shooting definition to the mass shooting datasets to determine whether the differences in databases could be contributing to differences in fatalities and injuries recorded. Results: Gun Violence Archive recorded the most mass shooting incidents at 346 incidents in 2017, while Mother Jones only recorded 11 cases. Only 2 events were found in all four mass shooting datasets. When the strictest definition-four or more individuals fatally shot-was applied to all datasets, the number of mass shootings in 2017 ranged from 24 (Gun Violence Archive) to 5 (Mother Jones), but incidents collected still varied. Conclusions: There is much variety in statistics obtained from the different sources that have collected mass shooting information, with little overlap among databases. Researchers should advocate for a standard definition that considers both fatalities and nonfatalities to most appropriately convey the burden of mass shootings on gun violence.

AB - Background: The mass shooting phenomenon has gained much attention lately as this form of gun violence appears to increase in frequency. Although many organizations collect information on mass shootings (fatal and nonfatal injuries), no federal definition of this phrase exists. The purpose of this study was to highlight the different statistics that result among databases that define and track "mass shootings." Establishing definitive guidelines for a mass shooting definition could improve research credibility when presenting evidence to policy makers. Methods: We obtained data for mass shootings that occurred in 2017 from four sources: Gun Violence Archive, Mother Jones Investigation, Everytown for Gun Safety, and FBI's Supplemental Homicide Report. We also examined FBI's Active Shooter Report to compare the mass shootings datasets with active shooter situations, which have been federally defined. First, we examined the overlap among databases. Then, we applied the strictest fatal mass shooting definition to the mass shooting datasets to determine whether the differences in databases could be contributing to differences in fatalities and injuries recorded. Results: Gun Violence Archive recorded the most mass shooting incidents at 346 incidents in 2017, while Mother Jones only recorded 11 cases. Only 2 events were found in all four mass shooting datasets. When the strictest definition-four or more individuals fatally shot-was applied to all datasets, the number of mass shootings in 2017 ranged from 24 (Gun Violence Archive) to 5 (Mother Jones), but incidents collected still varied. Conclusions: There is much variety in statistics obtained from the different sources that have collected mass shooting information, with little overlap among databases. Researchers should advocate for a standard definition that considers both fatalities and nonfatalities to most appropriately convey the burden of mass shootings on gun violence.

KW - Firearms

KW - Gun violence

KW - Mass shootings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076087436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076087436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40621-019-0226-7

DO - 10.1186/s40621-019-0226-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 31828004

AN - SCOPUS:85076087436

VL - 6

JO - Injury Epidemiology

JF - Injury Epidemiology

SN - 2197-1714

IS - 1

M1 - 47

ER -