Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research

Altovise T. Ewing, Lori Ann Hamby Erby, Juli Bollinger, Eva Tetteyfio, Luisel J. Ricks-Santi, David Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined acceptability of two biobank consent models and evaluated the impact of beliefs about privacy and genetic safeguards on acceptance. Methods: U.S. adults surveyed online in English and Spanish were randomly assigned to one of two scenarios examining acceptance of broad consent (n=1528), or narrow consent (n=1533). Results: Overall, willingness to provide broad (76%) and narrow (74%) consents were similar. African Americans were as likely as white non-Hispanics to accept narrow consent (72% vs. 77%, p=0.35) but significantly less likely to accept broad consent (69% vs. 81%, p=0.004). Education, insurance, and blood donation history were also related to acceptance. Adjusting for beliefs about privacy and policy protections (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA), the effects of the variables were reduced. Respondents who drew comfort from GINA were more likely to support both consent (both p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-106
Number of pages9
JournalBiopreservation and Biobanking
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Insurance
Genetic Privacy
Blood
Education
Demography
Computer Security
Privacy
Blood Donors
Research
African Americans
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Ewing, A. T., Erby, L. A. H., Bollinger, J., Tetteyfio, E., Ricks-Santi, L. J., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 13(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2014.0032

Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. / Ewing, Altovise T.; Erby, Lori Ann Hamby; Bollinger, Juli; Tetteyfio, Eva; Ricks-Santi, Luisel J.; Kaufman, David.

In: Biopreservation and Biobanking, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 98-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ewing, AT, Erby, LAH, Bollinger, J, Tetteyfio, E, Ricks-Santi, LJ & Kaufman, D 2015, 'Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research', Biopreservation and Biobanking, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2014.0032
Ewing, Altovise T. ; Erby, Lori Ann Hamby ; Bollinger, Juli ; Tetteyfio, Eva ; Ricks-Santi, Luisel J. ; Kaufman, David. / Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. In: Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 98-106.
@article{15f939f6745348e7ba151fbb10562e68,
title = "Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research",
abstract = "Purpose: This study examined acceptability of two biobank consent models and evaluated the impact of beliefs about privacy and genetic safeguards on acceptance. Methods: U.S. adults surveyed online in English and Spanish were randomly assigned to one of two scenarios examining acceptance of broad consent (n=1528), or narrow consent (n=1533). Results: Overall, willingness to provide broad (76{\%}) and narrow (74{\%}) consents were similar. African Americans were as likely as white non-Hispanics to accept narrow consent (72{\%} vs. 77{\%}, p=0.35) but significantly less likely to accept broad consent (69{\%} vs. 81{\%}, p=0.004). Education, insurance, and blood donation history were also related to acceptance. Adjusting for beliefs about privacy and policy protections (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA), the effects of the variables were reduced. Respondents who drew comfort from GINA were more likely to support both consent (both p",
author = "Ewing, {Altovise T.} and Erby, {Lori Ann Hamby} and Juli Bollinger and Eva Tetteyfio and Ricks-Santi, {Luisel J.} and David Kaufman",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/bio.2014.0032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "98--106",
journal = "Biopreservation and Biobanking",
issn = "1947-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research

AU - Ewing, Altovise T.

AU - Erby, Lori Ann Hamby

AU - Bollinger, Juli

AU - Tetteyfio, Eva

AU - Ricks-Santi, Luisel J.

AU - Kaufman, David

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Purpose: This study examined acceptability of two biobank consent models and evaluated the impact of beliefs about privacy and genetic safeguards on acceptance. Methods: U.S. adults surveyed online in English and Spanish were randomly assigned to one of two scenarios examining acceptance of broad consent (n=1528), or narrow consent (n=1533). Results: Overall, willingness to provide broad (76%) and narrow (74%) consents were similar. African Americans were as likely as white non-Hispanics to accept narrow consent (72% vs. 77%, p=0.35) but significantly less likely to accept broad consent (69% vs. 81%, p=0.004). Education, insurance, and blood donation history were also related to acceptance. Adjusting for beliefs about privacy and policy protections (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA), the effects of the variables were reduced. Respondents who drew comfort from GINA were more likely to support both consent (both p

AB - Purpose: This study examined acceptability of two biobank consent models and evaluated the impact of beliefs about privacy and genetic safeguards on acceptance. Methods: U.S. adults surveyed online in English and Spanish were randomly assigned to one of two scenarios examining acceptance of broad consent (n=1528), or narrow consent (n=1533). Results: Overall, willingness to provide broad (76%) and narrow (74%) consents were similar. African Americans were as likely as white non-Hispanics to accept narrow consent (72% vs. 77%, p=0.35) but significantly less likely to accept broad consent (69% vs. 81%, p=0.004). Education, insurance, and blood donation history were also related to acceptance. Adjusting for beliefs about privacy and policy protections (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA), the effects of the variables were reduced. Respondents who drew comfort from GINA were more likely to support both consent (both p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928489870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928489870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/bio.2014.0032

DO - 10.1089/bio.2014.0032

M3 - Article

C2 - 25825819

AN - SCOPUS:84928489870

VL - 13

SP - 98

EP - 106

JO - Biopreservation and Biobanking

JF - Biopreservation and Biobanking

SN - 1947-5535

IS - 2

ER -