Dementia - Epidemiological considerations, nomenclature, and a tacit consensus definition

John C.S. Breitner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Epidemiologic inquiry requires the definition of a "case." Dementia may be defined clinically or alternatively by inference of irreversible brain pathology. Several iterations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and International Classification of Diseases have skirted this issue by using criteria that are at once syndromic and neuropathological. The limitations of this compromise are revealed by large discrepancies in case identification when the various published criteria are strictly applied. Despite this problem, neuroepidemiologists have produced convergent estimates of the prevalence and incidence of dementia and its association with risk factors. This progress has reflected the tacit reliance of investigators on a simple definition of dementia as the syndrome of substantial global cognitive decline not attributable to alteration in level of consciousness. Beyond this description, our knowledge of pathology and, ultimately, the etiology of individual cases is extremely variable. Whatever its antecedents, syndromically defined dementia presents a looming public health crisis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Definition
  • Dementia
  • Epidemiology
  • Neuropathology
  • Syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dementia - Epidemiological considerations, nomenclature, and a tacit consensus definition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this