Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement

Louis P Hagopian, Griffin W. Rooker, Jennifer R. Zarcone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is maintained by automatic reinforcement in roughly 25% of cases. Automatically reinforced SIB typically has been considered a single functional category, and is less understood than socially reinforced SIB. Subtyping automatically reinforced SIB into functional categories has the potential to guide the development of more targeted interventions and increase our understanding of its biological underpinnings. The current study involved an analysis of 39 individuals with automatically reinforced SIB and a comparison group of 13 individuals with socially reinforced SIB. Automatically reinforced SIB was categorized into 3 subtypes based on patterns of responding in the functional analysis and the presence of self-restraint. These response features were selected as the basis for subtyping on the premise that they could reflect functional properties of SIB unique to each subtype. Analysis of treatment data revealed important differences across subtypes and provides preliminary support to warrant additional research on this proposed subtyping model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-543
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Self-Injurious Behavior
reinforcement
functional analysis
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement

Keywords

  • automatic reinforcement
  • functional analysis
  • self-injurious behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement. / Hagopian, Louis P; Rooker, Griffin W.; Zarcone, Jennifer R.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 523-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70c4df43dab94c2c97c3820dda7fc294,
title = "Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement",
abstract = "Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is maintained by automatic reinforcement in roughly 25{\%} of cases. Automatically reinforced SIB typically has been considered a single functional category, and is less understood than socially reinforced SIB. Subtyping automatically reinforced SIB into functional categories has the potential to guide the development of more targeted interventions and increase our understanding of its biological underpinnings. The current study involved an analysis of 39 individuals with automatically reinforced SIB and a comparison group of 13 individuals with socially reinforced SIB. Automatically reinforced SIB was categorized into 3 subtypes based on patterns of responding in the functional analysis and the presence of self-restraint. These response features were selected as the basis for subtyping on the premise that they could reflect functional properties of SIB unique to each subtype. Analysis of treatment data revealed important differences across subtypes and provides preliminary support to warrant additional research on this proposed subtyping model.",
keywords = "automatic reinforcement, functional analysis, self-injurious behavior",
author = "Hagopian, {Louis P} and Rooker, {Griffin W.} and Zarcone, {Jennifer R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jaba.236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "523--543",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delineating subtypes of self-injurious behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement

AU - Hagopian, Louis P

AU - Rooker, Griffin W.

AU - Zarcone, Jennifer R.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is maintained by automatic reinforcement in roughly 25% of cases. Automatically reinforced SIB typically has been considered a single functional category, and is less understood than socially reinforced SIB. Subtyping automatically reinforced SIB into functional categories has the potential to guide the development of more targeted interventions and increase our understanding of its biological underpinnings. The current study involved an analysis of 39 individuals with automatically reinforced SIB and a comparison group of 13 individuals with socially reinforced SIB. Automatically reinforced SIB was categorized into 3 subtypes based on patterns of responding in the functional analysis and the presence of self-restraint. These response features were selected as the basis for subtyping on the premise that they could reflect functional properties of SIB unique to each subtype. Analysis of treatment data revealed important differences across subtypes and provides preliminary support to warrant additional research on this proposed subtyping model.

AB - Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is maintained by automatic reinforcement in roughly 25% of cases. Automatically reinforced SIB typically has been considered a single functional category, and is less understood than socially reinforced SIB. Subtyping automatically reinforced SIB into functional categories has the potential to guide the development of more targeted interventions and increase our understanding of its biological underpinnings. The current study involved an analysis of 39 individuals with automatically reinforced SIB and a comparison group of 13 individuals with socially reinforced SIB. Automatically reinforced SIB was categorized into 3 subtypes based on patterns of responding in the functional analysis and the presence of self-restraint. These response features were selected as the basis for subtyping on the premise that they could reflect functional properties of SIB unique to each subtype. Analysis of treatment data revealed important differences across subtypes and provides preliminary support to warrant additional research on this proposed subtyping model.

KW - automatic reinforcement

KW - functional analysis

KW - self-injurious behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940797488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940797488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jaba.236

DO - 10.1002/jaba.236

M3 - Article

C2 - 26223959

AN - SCOPUS:84940797488

VL - 48

SP - 523

EP - 543

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -