Évaluation à distance d'une action de formation médicale continue

Translated title of the contribution: Delayed evaluation of continuous medical education

A. Steib, H. Bricard, J. C. Granry, J. F. Payen, P. Scherpereel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives - To analyse the results of delayed evaluation of European teaching sessions using a questionnaire provided by the French College of Anaesthesiologists. Study design - Open evaluation. Material - Questionnaires were completed 3-6 months after European courses provided in November-December 1999. Method - The types of professional exercise and the medical practice as well as the theme of the courses were pointed out. The evaluation included six items noted from 1 to 10: usefulness of the abstract book, discussion with colleagues, discussion with a manager, decision to modify medical practice, application of that decision, own objectives fulfilled. The global mean score for each item was calculated. Results were compared according to the professional mode of exercise and the theme of the course. Results - 5/7 centres provided information. 91/239 questionnaires were returned to the organizers. The participants were working in different structures (private clinic: 25, university hospital: 31, general hospital: 27, PSPH: 8). The main exercise was anaesthesiology (75/77 answers). Means scores affected to the different items were around 7 for all but one of them. The mean score concerning discussion with a manager was significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 3.2. Decision to modify their own practise was higher in private clinics compared to PSPH. The abstract book was more consulted after the first course (respiration and thorax). Conclusion - 3-6 months following the FEEA courses the participants thought to have fulfil their objectives and declared to have modify their medical practise. The lack of discussion with a manager should be analysed.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)856-860
Number of pages5
JournalAnnales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Information Centers
Anesthesiology
General Hospitals
Teaching
Respiration
Thorax
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • CME
  • Evaluation
  • Medical practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Évaluation à distance d'une action de formation médicale continue. / Steib, A.; Bricard, H.; Granry, J. C.; Payen, J. F.; Scherpereel, P.

In: Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation, Vol. 22, No. 10, 12.2003, p. 856-860.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steib, A. ; Bricard, H. ; Granry, J. C. ; Payen, J. F. ; Scherpereel, P. / Évaluation à distance d'une action de formation médicale continue. In: Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation. 2003 ; Vol. 22, No. 10. pp. 856-860.
@article{b04a3134835d4e7db2e0434aec69e956,
title = "{\'E}valuation {\`a} distance d'une action de formation m{\'e}dicale continue",
abstract = "Objectives - To analyse the results of delayed evaluation of European teaching sessions using a questionnaire provided by the French College of Anaesthesiologists. Study design - Open evaluation. Material - Questionnaires were completed 3-6 months after European courses provided in November-December 1999. Method - The types of professional exercise and the medical practice as well as the theme of the courses were pointed out. The evaluation included six items noted from 1 to 10: usefulness of the abstract book, discussion with colleagues, discussion with a manager, decision to modify medical practice, application of that decision, own objectives fulfilled. The global mean score for each item was calculated. Results were compared according to the professional mode of exercise and the theme of the course. Results - 5/7 centres provided information. 91/239 questionnaires were returned to the organizers. The participants were working in different structures (private clinic: 25, university hospital: 31, general hospital: 27, PSPH: 8). The main exercise was anaesthesiology (75/77 answers). Means scores affected to the different items were around 7 for all but one of them. The mean score concerning discussion with a manager was significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 3.2. Decision to modify their own practise was higher in private clinics compared to PSPH. The abstract book was more consulted after the first course (respiration and thorax). Conclusion - 3-6 months following the FEEA courses the participants thought to have fulfil their objectives and declared to have modify their medical practise. The lack of discussion with a manager should be analysed.",
keywords = "CME, Evaluation, Medical practice",
author = "A. Steib and H. Bricard and Granry, {J. C.} and Payen, {J. F.} and P. Scherpereel",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.002",
language = "French",
volume = "22",
pages = "856--860",
journal = "Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine",
issn = "0750-7658",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Évaluation à distance d'une action de formation médicale continue

AU - Steib, A.

AU - Bricard, H.

AU - Granry, J. C.

AU - Payen, J. F.

AU - Scherpereel, P.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Objectives - To analyse the results of delayed evaluation of European teaching sessions using a questionnaire provided by the French College of Anaesthesiologists. Study design - Open evaluation. Material - Questionnaires were completed 3-6 months after European courses provided in November-December 1999. Method - The types of professional exercise and the medical practice as well as the theme of the courses were pointed out. The evaluation included six items noted from 1 to 10: usefulness of the abstract book, discussion with colleagues, discussion with a manager, decision to modify medical practice, application of that decision, own objectives fulfilled. The global mean score for each item was calculated. Results were compared according to the professional mode of exercise and the theme of the course. Results - 5/7 centres provided information. 91/239 questionnaires were returned to the organizers. The participants were working in different structures (private clinic: 25, university hospital: 31, general hospital: 27, PSPH: 8). The main exercise was anaesthesiology (75/77 answers). Means scores affected to the different items were around 7 for all but one of them. The mean score concerning discussion with a manager was significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 3.2. Decision to modify their own practise was higher in private clinics compared to PSPH. The abstract book was more consulted after the first course (respiration and thorax). Conclusion - 3-6 months following the FEEA courses the participants thought to have fulfil their objectives and declared to have modify their medical practise. The lack of discussion with a manager should be analysed.

AB - Objectives - To analyse the results of delayed evaluation of European teaching sessions using a questionnaire provided by the French College of Anaesthesiologists. Study design - Open evaluation. Material - Questionnaires were completed 3-6 months after European courses provided in November-December 1999. Method - The types of professional exercise and the medical practice as well as the theme of the courses were pointed out. The evaluation included six items noted from 1 to 10: usefulness of the abstract book, discussion with colleagues, discussion with a manager, decision to modify medical practice, application of that decision, own objectives fulfilled. The global mean score for each item was calculated. Results were compared according to the professional mode of exercise and the theme of the course. Results - 5/7 centres provided information. 91/239 questionnaires were returned to the organizers. The participants were working in different structures (private clinic: 25, university hospital: 31, general hospital: 27, PSPH: 8). The main exercise was anaesthesiology (75/77 answers). Means scores affected to the different items were around 7 for all but one of them. The mean score concerning discussion with a manager was significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 3.2. Decision to modify their own practise was higher in private clinics compared to PSPH. The abstract book was more consulted after the first course (respiration and thorax). Conclusion - 3-6 months following the FEEA courses the participants thought to have fulfil their objectives and declared to have modify their medical practise. The lack of discussion with a manager should be analysed.

KW - CME

KW - Evaluation

KW - Medical practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345601918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345601918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 856

EP - 860

JO - Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine

JF - Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine

SN - 0750-7658

IS - 10

ER -