Defining quality indicators for best-practice management of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada

Geoffrey C. Nguyen, Shane M. Devlin, Waqqas Afif, Brian Bressler, Steven E. Gruchy, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Liliana Oliveira, Sophie Plamondon, Cynthia H. Seow, Chadwick Williams, Karen Wong, Brian M. Yan, Jennifer Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of published data regarding the quality of care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada. Clinical quality indicators are quantitative end points used to guide, monitor and improve the quality of patient care. In Canada, where universal health care can vary significantly among provinces, quality indicators can be used to identify potential gaps in the delivery of IBD care and standardize the approach to interprovincial management. METHODS: The Emerging Practice in IBD Collaborative (EPIC) group generated a shortlist of IBD quality indicators based on a comprehensive literature review. An iterative voting process was used to select quality indicators to take forward. In a face-to-face meeting with the EPIC group, available evidence to support each quality indicator was presented by the EPIC member aligned to it, followed by group discussion to agree on the wording of the statements. The selected quality indicators were then ratified in a final vote by all EPIC members. RESULTS: Eleven quality indicators for the management of IBD within the single-payer health care system of Canada were developed. These focus on accurate diagnosis, appropriate and timely management, disease monitoring, and prevention or treatment of complications of IBD or its therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These quality indicators are measurable, reflective of the evidence base and expert opinion, and define a standard of care that is at least a minimum that should be expected for IBD management in Canada. The next steps for the EPIC group involve conducting research to assess current practice across Canada as it pertains to these quality indicators and to measure the impact of each of these indicators on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-285
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • Canada
  • Crohn disease
  • Delivery of health care
  • Process assessment
  • Quality indicators
  • Ulcerative colitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Defining quality indicators for best-practice management of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this