Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: What is the role?

Elizabeth Hechenbleikner, Martin A Makary, Daniel Samarov, Curtis Leung, Jason D. Miller, Amy Deutschendorf, Daniel Brotman, Diane E. Holland, Kathryn H. Bowles, Elizabeth C. Wick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Decision support tools prioritizing transitional care can help decrease medical readmissions but little evidence exists within surgical specialties. Materials and methods This study evaluated the use of early screen for discharge planning and discharge decision support system screening tools or selective multidisciplinary clinical evaluation for targeting post-acute care interventions among higher risk colorectal surgery patients based on 30-d readmission status. Patients with positive screening tool scores underwent standard discharge planning education and evaluation during index operation hospitalization and were referred for targeted post-acute interventions; patients with negative screening tool scores were further clinically evaluated for selective referral for post-acute interventions. Results We identified 300 colorectal surgery patients; 30.3% (n = 91) of patients had a positive screening score (early screen for discharge planning and/or discharge decision support system). Positive screening scores did not correlate with hospital readmission (35% of readmitted patients versus 29% of non-readmitted had a positive screen; P = 0.424). After negative screening scores, selective referral based on clinical assessment for postdischarge interventions helped to concentrate resources in patients who were later readmitted. Index hospitalization complications were significantly associated with positive screening tool scores whereas postdischarge complications were most predictive of readmission. Conclusions Among colorectal surgery patients, selective clinical referrals appeared to be the best method for targeting post-acute interventions in patients at higher risk for readmission. Future research should focus on improving existing processes of care to reduce postoperative complications and constructing better tools to assess individual patients' needs for targeted interventions in the post-acute setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume194
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Patient Discharge
Referral and Consultation
Subacute Care
Hospitalization
Surgical Specialties
Patient Readmission
Education

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Decision support tools
  • Readmissions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hechenbleikner, E., Makary, M. A., Samarov, D., Leung, C., Miller, J. D., Deutschendorf, A., ... Wick, E. C. (2015). Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: What is the role? Journal of Surgical Research, 194(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011

Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery : What is the role? / Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth; Makary, Martin A; Samarov, Daniel; Leung, Curtis; Miller, Jason D.; Deutschendorf, Amy; Brotman, Daniel; Holland, Diane E.; Bowles, Kathryn H.; Wick, Elizabeth C.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 194, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 69-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hechenbleikner, E, Makary, MA, Samarov, D, Leung, C, Miller, JD, Deutschendorf, A, Brotman, D, Holland, DE, Bowles, KH & Wick, EC 2015, 'Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: What is the role?', Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011
Hechenbleikner E, Makary MA, Samarov D, Leung C, Miller JD, Deutschendorf A et al. Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: What is the role? Journal of Surgical Research. 2015 Mar 1;194(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011
Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth ; Makary, Martin A ; Samarov, Daniel ; Leung, Curtis ; Miller, Jason D. ; Deutschendorf, Amy ; Brotman, Daniel ; Holland, Diane E. ; Bowles, Kathryn H. ; Wick, Elizabeth C. / Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery : What is the role?. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2015 ; Vol. 194, No. 1. pp. 69-76.
@article{d3335e5b090e43f2aad38b5cbc7d8262,
title = "Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery: What is the role?",
abstract = "Background Decision support tools prioritizing transitional care can help decrease medical readmissions but little evidence exists within surgical specialties. Materials and methods This study evaluated the use of early screen for discharge planning and discharge decision support system screening tools or selective multidisciplinary clinical evaluation for targeting post-acute care interventions among higher risk colorectal surgery patients based on 30-d readmission status. Patients with positive screening tool scores underwent standard discharge planning education and evaluation during index operation hospitalization and were referred for targeted post-acute interventions; patients with negative screening tool scores were further clinically evaluated for selective referral for post-acute interventions. Results We identified 300 colorectal surgery patients; 30.3{\%} (n = 91) of patients had a positive screening score (early screen for discharge planning and/or discharge decision support system). Positive screening scores did not correlate with hospital readmission (35{\%} of readmitted patients versus 29{\%} of non-readmitted had a positive screen; P = 0.424). After negative screening scores, selective referral based on clinical assessment for postdischarge interventions helped to concentrate resources in patients who were later readmitted. Index hospitalization complications were significantly associated with positive screening tool scores whereas postdischarge complications were most predictive of readmission. Conclusions Among colorectal surgery patients, selective clinical referrals appeared to be the best method for targeting post-acute interventions in patients at higher risk for readmission. Future research should focus on improving existing processes of care to reduce postoperative complications and constructing better tools to assess individual patients' needs for targeted interventions in the post-acute setting.",
keywords = "Colorectal surgery, Decision support tools, Readmissions",
author = "Elizabeth Hechenbleikner and Makary, {Martin A} and Daniel Samarov and Curtis Leung and Miller, {Jason D.} and Amy Deutschendorf and Daniel Brotman and Holland, {Diane E.} and Bowles, {Kathryn H.} and Wick, {Elizabeth C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "194",
pages = "69--76",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision support tool use in colorectal surgery

T2 - What is the role?

AU - Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth

AU - Makary, Martin A

AU - Samarov, Daniel

AU - Leung, Curtis

AU - Miller, Jason D.

AU - Deutschendorf, Amy

AU - Brotman, Daniel

AU - Holland, Diane E.

AU - Bowles, Kathryn H.

AU - Wick, Elizabeth C.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Background Decision support tools prioritizing transitional care can help decrease medical readmissions but little evidence exists within surgical specialties. Materials and methods This study evaluated the use of early screen for discharge planning and discharge decision support system screening tools or selective multidisciplinary clinical evaluation for targeting post-acute care interventions among higher risk colorectal surgery patients based on 30-d readmission status. Patients with positive screening tool scores underwent standard discharge planning education and evaluation during index operation hospitalization and were referred for targeted post-acute interventions; patients with negative screening tool scores were further clinically evaluated for selective referral for post-acute interventions. Results We identified 300 colorectal surgery patients; 30.3% (n = 91) of patients had a positive screening score (early screen for discharge planning and/or discharge decision support system). Positive screening scores did not correlate with hospital readmission (35% of readmitted patients versus 29% of non-readmitted had a positive screen; P = 0.424). After negative screening scores, selective referral based on clinical assessment for postdischarge interventions helped to concentrate resources in patients who were later readmitted. Index hospitalization complications were significantly associated with positive screening tool scores whereas postdischarge complications were most predictive of readmission. Conclusions Among colorectal surgery patients, selective clinical referrals appeared to be the best method for targeting post-acute interventions in patients at higher risk for readmission. Future research should focus on improving existing processes of care to reduce postoperative complications and constructing better tools to assess individual patients' needs for targeted interventions in the post-acute setting.

AB - Background Decision support tools prioritizing transitional care can help decrease medical readmissions but little evidence exists within surgical specialties. Materials and methods This study evaluated the use of early screen for discharge planning and discharge decision support system screening tools or selective multidisciplinary clinical evaluation for targeting post-acute care interventions among higher risk colorectal surgery patients based on 30-d readmission status. Patients with positive screening tool scores underwent standard discharge planning education and evaluation during index operation hospitalization and were referred for targeted post-acute interventions; patients with negative screening tool scores were further clinically evaluated for selective referral for post-acute interventions. Results We identified 300 colorectal surgery patients; 30.3% (n = 91) of patients had a positive screening score (early screen for discharge planning and/or discharge decision support system). Positive screening scores did not correlate with hospital readmission (35% of readmitted patients versus 29% of non-readmitted had a positive screen; P = 0.424). After negative screening scores, selective referral based on clinical assessment for postdischarge interventions helped to concentrate resources in patients who were later readmitted. Index hospitalization complications were significantly associated with positive screening tool scores whereas postdischarge complications were most predictive of readmission. Conclusions Among colorectal surgery patients, selective clinical referrals appeared to be the best method for targeting post-acute interventions in patients at higher risk for readmission. Future research should focus on improving existing processes of care to reduce postoperative complications and constructing better tools to assess individual patients' needs for targeted interventions in the post-acute setting.

KW - Colorectal surgery

KW - Decision support tools

KW - Readmissions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924740365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924740365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 25439506

AN - SCOPUS:84924740365

VL - 194

SP - 69

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -