Data-driven intensity normalization of PET group comparison studies is superior to global mean normalization

Per Borghammer, Joel Aanerud, Albert Gjedde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Global mean (GM) normalization is one of the most commonly used methods of normalization in PET and SPECT group comparison studies of neurodegenerative disorders. It requires that no between-group GM difference is present, which may be strongly violated in neurodegenerative disorders. Importantly, such GM differences often elude detection due to the large intrinsic variance in absolute values of cerebral blood flow or glucose consumption. Alternative methods of normalization are needed for this type of data. Materials and methods: Two types of simulation were performed using CBF images from 49 controls. Two homogeneous groups of 20 subjects were sampled repeatedly. In one group, cortical CBF was artificially decreased moderately (simulation I) or slightly (simulation II). The other group served as controls. Ratio normalization was performed using five reference regions: (1) Global mean; (2) An unbiased VOI; (3) Data-driven region extraction (Andersson); (4-5) Reference cluster methods (Yakushev et al.). Using voxel-based statistics, it was determined how much of the original signal was detected following each type of normalization. Results: For both simulations, global mean normalization performed poorly, with only a few percent of the original signal recovered. Global mean normalization moreover created artificial increases. In contrast, the data-driven reference cluster method detected 65-95% of the original signal. Conclusion: In the present simulation, the reference cluster method was superior to GM normalization. We conclude that the reference cluster method will likely yield more accurate results in the study of patients with early to moderate stage neurodegenerative disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)981-988
Number of pages8
JournalNeuroImage
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neurodegenerative Diseases
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Glucose

Keywords

  • CBF
  • Energy metabolism
  • Normalization
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Proportional scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Data-driven intensity normalization of PET group comparison studies is superior to global mean normalization. / Borghammer, Per; Aanerud, Joel; Gjedde, Albert.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 46, No. 4, 15.07.2009, p. 981-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borghammer, Per ; Aanerud, Joel ; Gjedde, Albert. / Data-driven intensity normalization of PET group comparison studies is superior to global mean normalization. In: NeuroImage. 2009 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 981-988.
@article{bc4bf52389954312830e4202f033f01f,
title = "Data-driven intensity normalization of PET group comparison studies is superior to global mean normalization",
abstract = "Background: Global mean (GM) normalization is one of the most commonly used methods of normalization in PET and SPECT group comparison studies of neurodegenerative disorders. It requires that no between-group GM difference is present, which may be strongly violated in neurodegenerative disorders. Importantly, such GM differences often elude detection due to the large intrinsic variance in absolute values of cerebral blood flow or glucose consumption. Alternative methods of normalization are needed for this type of data. Materials and methods: Two types of simulation were performed using CBF images from 49 controls. Two homogeneous groups of 20 subjects were sampled repeatedly. In one group, cortical CBF was artificially decreased moderately (simulation I) or slightly (simulation II). The other group served as controls. Ratio normalization was performed using five reference regions: (1) Global mean; (2) An unbiased VOI; (3) Data-driven region extraction (Andersson); (4-5) Reference cluster methods (Yakushev et al.). Using voxel-based statistics, it was determined how much of the original signal was detected following each type of normalization. Results: For both simulations, global mean normalization performed poorly, with only a few percent of the original signal recovered. Global mean normalization moreover created artificial increases. In contrast, the data-driven reference cluster method detected 65-95{\%} of the original signal. Conclusion: In the present simulation, the reference cluster method was superior to GM normalization. We conclude that the reference cluster method will likely yield more accurate results in the study of patients with early to moderate stage neurodegenerative disorders.",
keywords = "CBF, Energy metabolism, Normalization, Parkinson's disease, Proportional scaling",
author = "Per Borghammer and Joel Aanerud and Albert Gjedde",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "981--988",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data-driven intensity normalization of PET group comparison studies is superior to global mean normalization

AU - Borghammer, Per

AU - Aanerud, Joel

AU - Gjedde, Albert

PY - 2009/7/15

Y1 - 2009/7/15

N2 - Background: Global mean (GM) normalization is one of the most commonly used methods of normalization in PET and SPECT group comparison studies of neurodegenerative disorders. It requires that no between-group GM difference is present, which may be strongly violated in neurodegenerative disorders. Importantly, such GM differences often elude detection due to the large intrinsic variance in absolute values of cerebral blood flow or glucose consumption. Alternative methods of normalization are needed for this type of data. Materials and methods: Two types of simulation were performed using CBF images from 49 controls. Two homogeneous groups of 20 subjects were sampled repeatedly. In one group, cortical CBF was artificially decreased moderately (simulation I) or slightly (simulation II). The other group served as controls. Ratio normalization was performed using five reference regions: (1) Global mean; (2) An unbiased VOI; (3) Data-driven region extraction (Andersson); (4-5) Reference cluster methods (Yakushev et al.). Using voxel-based statistics, it was determined how much of the original signal was detected following each type of normalization. Results: For both simulations, global mean normalization performed poorly, with only a few percent of the original signal recovered. Global mean normalization moreover created artificial increases. In contrast, the data-driven reference cluster method detected 65-95% of the original signal. Conclusion: In the present simulation, the reference cluster method was superior to GM normalization. We conclude that the reference cluster method will likely yield more accurate results in the study of patients with early to moderate stage neurodegenerative disorders.

AB - Background: Global mean (GM) normalization is one of the most commonly used methods of normalization in PET and SPECT group comparison studies of neurodegenerative disorders. It requires that no between-group GM difference is present, which may be strongly violated in neurodegenerative disorders. Importantly, such GM differences often elude detection due to the large intrinsic variance in absolute values of cerebral blood flow or glucose consumption. Alternative methods of normalization are needed for this type of data. Materials and methods: Two types of simulation were performed using CBF images from 49 controls. Two homogeneous groups of 20 subjects were sampled repeatedly. In one group, cortical CBF was artificially decreased moderately (simulation I) or slightly (simulation II). The other group served as controls. Ratio normalization was performed using five reference regions: (1) Global mean; (2) An unbiased VOI; (3) Data-driven region extraction (Andersson); (4-5) Reference cluster methods (Yakushev et al.). Using voxel-based statistics, it was determined how much of the original signal was detected following each type of normalization. Results: For both simulations, global mean normalization performed poorly, with only a few percent of the original signal recovered. Global mean normalization moreover created artificial increases. In contrast, the data-driven reference cluster method detected 65-95% of the original signal. Conclusion: In the present simulation, the reference cluster method was superior to GM normalization. We conclude that the reference cluster method will likely yield more accurate results in the study of patients with early to moderate stage neurodegenerative disorders.

KW - CBF

KW - Energy metabolism

KW - Normalization

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - Proportional scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349114202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349114202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.021

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 19303935

AN - SCOPUS:67349114202

VL - 46

SP - 981

EP - 988

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 4

ER -