Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for fine-needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue neoplasms

Matthew T. Olson, Anna Novak, Thiraphon Boonyaarunnate, Hinna Shahid, John Kirby, Syed Z Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: On-site evaluation of adequacy (OSEA) is commonly used to increase the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures. OSEA is increasingly necessary with the widespread use of image-guided procedures, which are expensive to perform and repeat. The increased demand for OSEA has prompted an increasing reliance on cytotechnologists for OSEA in many practices, including ours. However, the performance of cytotechnologists has not been compared with that of cytopathologists for OSEA in FNA of bone and soft tissue tumors. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 years of data in which both cytotechnologists and cytopathologists performed OSEA for 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA. We calculated adequacy and accuracy statistics in conjunction with other variables including imaging modality, biopsy site, accompanying core biopsy, tissue type, final diagnosis, and number of smears. Results: Of the 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA procedures, OSEA was performed in 223 (35.3%) by cytotechnologists and in 409 (64.7%) by cytopathologists. There was no difference in the adequacy downgrade rate for cytotechnologists versus cytopathologists during this study period (4.5 versus 2.4%, P = 0.23). The adequacy rates for procedures in which OSEA was performed by cytotechnologists and cytopathologists did not differ significantly (78.9 versus 84.1%, P = 0.13). Conclusions: Cytotechnologists and cytopathologists are comparably accurate in OSEA of bone and soft tissue neoplasms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Bone Tissue Neoplasms
Soft Tissue Neoplasms
Fine Needle Biopsy
Bone and Bones
Biopsy
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Cytotechnologists
  • Fine-needle aspiration
  • On-site evaluation of adequacy
  • Soft tissue sarcoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for fine-needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue neoplasms. / Olson, Matthew T.; Novak, Anna; Boonyaarunnate, Thiraphon; Shahid, Hinna; Kirby, John; Ali, Syed Z.

In: Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 60-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olson, Matthew T. ; Novak, Anna ; Boonyaarunnate, Thiraphon ; Shahid, Hinna ; Kirby, John ; Ali, Syed Z. / Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for fine-needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue neoplasms. In: Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 60-66.
@article{d2b47a49b27d4af194eeccf69279b529,
title = "Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for fine-needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue neoplasms",
abstract = "Introduction: On-site evaluation of adequacy (OSEA) is commonly used to increase the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures. OSEA is increasingly necessary with the widespread use of image-guided procedures, which are expensive to perform and repeat. The increased demand for OSEA has prompted an increasing reliance on cytotechnologists for OSEA in many practices, including ours. However, the performance of cytotechnologists has not been compared with that of cytopathologists for OSEA in FNA of bone and soft tissue tumors. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 years of data in which both cytotechnologists and cytopathologists performed OSEA for 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA. We calculated adequacy and accuracy statistics in conjunction with other variables including imaging modality, biopsy site, accompanying core biopsy, tissue type, final diagnosis, and number of smears. Results: Of the 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA procedures, OSEA was performed in 223 (35.3{\%}) by cytotechnologists and in 409 (64.7{\%}) by cytopathologists. There was no difference in the adequacy downgrade rate for cytotechnologists versus cytopathologists during this study period (4.5 versus 2.4{\%}, P = 0.23). The adequacy rates for procedures in which OSEA was performed by cytotechnologists and cytopathologists did not differ significantly (78.9 versus 84.1{\%}, P = 0.13). Conclusions: Cytotechnologists and cytopathologists are comparably accurate in OSEA of bone and soft tissue neoplasms.",
keywords = "Bone, Cytotechnologists, Fine-needle aspiration, On-site evaluation of adequacy, Soft tissue sarcoma",
author = "Olson, {Matthew T.} and Anna Novak and Thiraphon Boonyaarunnate and Hinna Shahid and John Kirby and Ali, {Syed Z}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jasc.2013.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "60--66",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology",
issn = "2213-2945",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for fine-needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue neoplasms

AU - Olson, Matthew T.

AU - Novak, Anna

AU - Boonyaarunnate, Thiraphon

AU - Shahid, Hinna

AU - Kirby, John

AU - Ali, Syed Z

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Introduction: On-site evaluation of adequacy (OSEA) is commonly used to increase the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures. OSEA is increasingly necessary with the widespread use of image-guided procedures, which are expensive to perform and repeat. The increased demand for OSEA has prompted an increasing reliance on cytotechnologists for OSEA in many practices, including ours. However, the performance of cytotechnologists has not been compared with that of cytopathologists for OSEA in FNA of bone and soft tissue tumors. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 years of data in which both cytotechnologists and cytopathologists performed OSEA for 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA. We calculated adequacy and accuracy statistics in conjunction with other variables including imaging modality, biopsy site, accompanying core biopsy, tissue type, final diagnosis, and number of smears. Results: Of the 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA procedures, OSEA was performed in 223 (35.3%) by cytotechnologists and in 409 (64.7%) by cytopathologists. There was no difference in the adequacy downgrade rate for cytotechnologists versus cytopathologists during this study period (4.5 versus 2.4%, P = 0.23). The adequacy rates for procedures in which OSEA was performed by cytotechnologists and cytopathologists did not differ significantly (78.9 versus 84.1%, P = 0.13). Conclusions: Cytotechnologists and cytopathologists are comparably accurate in OSEA of bone and soft tissue neoplasms.

AB - Introduction: On-site evaluation of adequacy (OSEA) is commonly used to increase the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures. OSEA is increasingly necessary with the widespread use of image-guided procedures, which are expensive to perform and repeat. The increased demand for OSEA has prompted an increasing reliance on cytotechnologists for OSEA in many practices, including ours. However, the performance of cytotechnologists has not been compared with that of cytopathologists for OSEA in FNA of bone and soft tissue tumors. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 years of data in which both cytotechnologists and cytopathologists performed OSEA for 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA. We calculated adequacy and accuracy statistics in conjunction with other variables including imaging modality, biopsy site, accompanying core biopsy, tissue type, final diagnosis, and number of smears. Results: Of the 632 bone and soft tissue tumor FNA procedures, OSEA was performed in 223 (35.3%) by cytotechnologists and in 409 (64.7%) by cytopathologists. There was no difference in the adequacy downgrade rate for cytotechnologists versus cytopathologists during this study period (4.5 versus 2.4%, P = 0.23). The adequacy rates for procedures in which OSEA was performed by cytotechnologists and cytopathologists did not differ significantly (78.9 versus 84.1%, P = 0.13). Conclusions: Cytotechnologists and cytopathologists are comparably accurate in OSEA of bone and soft tissue neoplasms.

KW - Bone

KW - Cytotechnologists

KW - Fine-needle aspiration

KW - On-site evaluation of adequacy

KW - Soft tissue sarcoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894087512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894087512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jasc.2013.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jasc.2013.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84894087512

VL - 3

SP - 60

EP - 66

JO - Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology

JF - Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology

SN - 2213-2945

IS - 2

ER -