Cytogenetics of 158 patients with regional or disseminated melanoma Subset analysis of near-diploid and simple karyotypes

Floyd H. Thompson, Julia Emerson, Sharon Olson, Ronald Weinstein, S. Anne Leavitt, Stanley P.L. Leong, Scott Emerson, Jeffrey M. Trent, Mark A. Nelson, Sydney E. Salmon, Raymond Taetle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

144 Scopus citations

Abstract

We report on the cytogenetic analyses of 158 cases of metastatic malignant melanoma, comprised of 63 cases with regional disease (RD) and 95 cases with distant (metastatic) disease (DD). Clonal structural abnormalities were identified in 126 (80%) cases and were significantly increased (< 0.01 after adjusting for multiple comparisons) on chromosomes (in order of frequency of involvement) 1, 6, 7, 11, 9, and 3. Clustering of breakpoints occurred at 1p36, 1p22-q21, 6p11-q21, 9p, 11q23-qter, 13p (especially for cases with DD), and 19q13. The most common clonal numerical abnormalities, in a subset of 49 near-diploid cases were -10, -22, -9, +7, -19, and -Y. Analysis of chromosome segment gains and losses (CSRP) showed frequent loss of chromosomes 6 and 10, followed by equal rates of involvement of chromosomes 1, 7, and 9. Whole or segmental losses of chromosome 9 (especially 9p) correlate well with recent molecular genetic studies identifying putative suppressor genes, and are also likely important genetic abnormalities. However, based on the frequency of abnormalities in this large series of metastatic melanomas, it is likely that structural abnormalities of 1 and 6, and -10 are important in the pathogenesis of sporadic advanced melanoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-104
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1995
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cytogenetics of 158 patients with regional or disseminated melanoma Subset analysis of near-diploid and simple karyotypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this