Custom vs conventional PRK: A prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of postoperative visual function

Mark D. Mifflin, Bryndon B. Hatch, Shameema Sikder, James Bell, Christopher J. Kurz, Majid Moshirfar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether VISX S4 (VISX Inc) custom photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) results in better visual outcomes than VISX S4 conventional PRK. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed on 80 eyes from 40 patients in this randomized, prospective, contralateral eye study. Dominant eyes were randomized to one group with the fellow eye receiving the alternate treatment. Primary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and root-mean-square (RMS) higher order aberrations. RESULTS: Mean UDVA was -0.023±0.099 (20/19) in the custom group and -0.044±0.080 (20/18) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.293). Mean CDVA was -0.073±0.067 (20/17) in the custom group and -0.079±0.071 (20/17) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.659). Total higher order aberration RMS and spherical aberration increased in both groups compared to preoperative values (P<.05). Coma increased in the conventional group (P<.05) whereas it was similar to preoperative values in the custom group. No significant differences were noted in induction of trefoil. CONCLUSIONS: Custom and conventional PRK were shown to be safe and effective with excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance at 6 and 12 months. Conventional PRK induced more coma than custom PRK; however, this did not seem to correlate with clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-132
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Custom vs conventional PRK: A prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of postoperative visual function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this