TY - JOUR
T1 - Current state of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research
AU - 5th EORTC Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials Conference Faculty
AU - Bottomley, Andrew
AU - Reijneveld, Jaap C.
AU - Koller, Michael
AU - Flechtner, Henning
AU - Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
AU - Greimel, Eva
AU - Ganz, Patricia A.
AU - Ringash, Jolie
AU - O'Connor, Daniel
AU - Kluetz, Paul G.
AU - Tafuri, Giovanni
AU - Grønvold, Mogens
AU - Snyder, Claire
AU - Gotay, Carolyn
AU - Fallowfield, Dame Lesley
AU - Apostolidis, Kathi
AU - Wilson, Roger
AU - Stephens, Richard
AU - Schünemann, Holger
AU - Calvert, Melanie
AU - Holzner, Bernhard
AU - Musoro, Jammbe Z.
AU - Wheelwright, Sally
AU - Martinelli, Francesca
AU - Dueck, Amylou C.
AU - Pe, Madeline
AU - Coens, Corneel
AU - Velikova, Galina
AU - Kuliś, Dagmara
AU - Taphoorn, Martin J.B.
AU - Darlington, Anne Sophie
AU - Lewis, Ian
AU - van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the EORTC Quality of Life Group ; an unrestricted educational grant form Celgene and an unrestricted educational grant form RWS Life Sciences .
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the EORTC Quality of Life Group; an unrestricted educational grant form Celgene and an unrestricted educational grant form RWS Life Sciences.Andrew Bottomley reports unrestricted educational grants for the EORTC from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Merck, and BMS for work outside the submitted project and grants from EORTC Cancer Research Fund, the EORTC Quality of Life Group, Celgene and RWS Life Sciences for the conduct of the conference. Andrew is a member of the EORTC. Michael Koller reports EORTC QLG grants and consulting contracts payments with Lilly and MSD. Jaap C. Reijneveld, Henning Flechtner, Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski and Eva Greimel report no conflicts of interest.Medical writing assistance was provided by John Bean PhD, Bean Medical Writing, Halle, Belgium and was funded by the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The 5th EORTC Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials Conference was managed by Davi Kaur, Danielle Zimmerman, Said Laghmari, Pat Vanhove, Laurence Decroix, Frederic Rince and Gwydion Lyn of the EORTC Communication and Events Team, and Melodie Cherton and other staff of the EORTC Quality of Life Department, Brussels, Belgium.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - The 5th EORTC Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials Conference presented the current state of quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) research from the perspectives of researchers, regulators, industry representatives, patients and patient advocates and health care professionals. A major theme was the assessment of the burden of cancer treatments, and this was discussed in terms of regulatory challenges in using PRO assessments in clinical trials, patients’ experiences in cancer clinical trials, innovative methods and standardisation in cancer research, innovative methods across the disease sites or populations and cancer survivorship. Conferees demonstrated that PROs are becoming more accepted and major efforts are ongoing internationally to standardise PROs measurement, analysis and reporting in trials. Regulators are keen to collaborate with all stakeholders to ensure that the right questions are asked and the right answers are communicated. Improved technology and increased flexibility of measurement instruments are making PROs data more robust. Patients are being encouraged to be patient partners. International collaborations are essential, because this work cannot be accomplished on a national level.
AB - The 5th EORTC Quality of Life in Cancer Clinical Trials Conference presented the current state of quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) research from the perspectives of researchers, regulators, industry representatives, patients and patient advocates and health care professionals. A major theme was the assessment of the burden of cancer treatments, and this was discussed in terms of regulatory challenges in using PRO assessments in clinical trials, patients’ experiences in cancer clinical trials, innovative methods and standardisation in cancer research, innovative methods across the disease sites or populations and cancer survivorship. Conferees demonstrated that PROs are becoming more accepted and major efforts are ongoing internationally to standardise PROs measurement, analysis and reporting in trials. Regulators are keen to collaborate with all stakeholders to ensure that the right questions are asked and the right answers are communicated. Improved technology and increased flexibility of measurement instruments are making PROs data more robust. Patients are being encouraged to be patient partners. International collaborations are essential, because this work cannot be accomplished on a national level.
KW - Cancer patients
KW - Cancer survivorship
KW - Cancer treatment
KW - Patient-reported outcomes
KW - Quality of life
KW - Symptom assessments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072582660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072582660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31561134
AN - SCOPUS:85072582660
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 121
SP - 55
EP - 63
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -