Current rehabilitation strategy: Clinical evidence for erection recovery after radical prostatectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Erectile function (EF) recovery remains a prominent functional outcome underachievement of radical prostatectomy (RP), despite the success of anatomic "nerve-sparing" technique and its recent refinements in the modern surgical era. Delayed (for as much as a few years) or incomplete (partial and unusable) EF recovery commonly occurs in many men still today undergoing this surgery. "Penile rehabilitation", alternatively termed "EF rehabilitation", originated formally as a therapeutic practice approximately 15 years ago for addressing post-RP erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond conventional ED management. Although the premise of this therapy is conceptually sound and generally accepted, in reference to the implementation of strategies for promoting EF recovery to a naturally functional level in the absence of erectile aids (distinct from the premise of conventional ED management), the optimal manner and efficacy of currently suggested therapeutic strategies are far less established. Such strategies include regimens of standard ED-specific therapies (e.g., oral, intracavernosal, and intraurethral pharmacotherapies; vacuum erection device therapy) and courses of innovative interventions (e.g., statins, erythropoietin, angiotensin receptor blockers). An endeavor in evolution, erection rehabilitation may ideally comprise an integrative program of sexual health management incorporating counseling, coaching, guidance toward general health optimization and application of demonstrably effective "rehabilitative" interventions. Ongoing intensive discovery and rigorous investigation are required to establish efficacy of therapeutic prospects that fulfill the intent of post-RP erection rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-31
Number of pages8
JournalTranslational Andrology and Urology
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Erectile Dysfunction
Rehabilitation
Recovery of Function
Underachievement
Erythropoietin Receptors
Therapeutics
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Investigational Therapies
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
Reproductive Health
Vacuum
Counseling
Drug Therapy
Equipment and Supplies
Health

Keywords

  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Penile erection
  • Pharmacotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Urology

Cite this

@article{741c7c1215894cbbaa66e69c24cdf052,
title = "Current rehabilitation strategy: Clinical evidence for erection recovery after radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "Erectile function (EF) recovery remains a prominent functional outcome underachievement of radical prostatectomy (RP), despite the success of anatomic {"}nerve-sparing{"} technique and its recent refinements in the modern surgical era. Delayed (for as much as a few years) or incomplete (partial and unusable) EF recovery commonly occurs in many men still today undergoing this surgery. {"}Penile rehabilitation{"}, alternatively termed {"}EF rehabilitation{"}, originated formally as a therapeutic practice approximately 15 years ago for addressing post-RP erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond conventional ED management. Although the premise of this therapy is conceptually sound and generally accepted, in reference to the implementation of strategies for promoting EF recovery to a naturally functional level in the absence of erectile aids (distinct from the premise of conventional ED management), the optimal manner and efficacy of currently suggested therapeutic strategies are far less established. Such strategies include regimens of standard ED-specific therapies (e.g., oral, intracavernosal, and intraurethral pharmacotherapies; vacuum erection device therapy) and courses of innovative interventions (e.g., statins, erythropoietin, angiotensin receptor blockers). An endeavor in evolution, erection rehabilitation may ideally comprise an integrative program of sexual health management incorporating counseling, coaching, guidance toward general health optimization and application of demonstrably effective {"}rehabilitative{"} interventions. Ongoing intensive discovery and rigorous investigation are required to establish efficacy of therapeutic prospects that fulfill the intent of post-RP erection rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Erectile dysfunction, Penile erection, Pharmacotherapy",
author = "Arthur Burnett",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.07",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "24--31",
journal = "Translational Andrology and Urology",
issn = "2223-4683",
publisher = "AME Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current rehabilitation strategy

T2 - Clinical evidence for erection recovery after radical prostatectomy

AU - Burnett, Arthur

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Erectile function (EF) recovery remains a prominent functional outcome underachievement of radical prostatectomy (RP), despite the success of anatomic "nerve-sparing" technique and its recent refinements in the modern surgical era. Delayed (for as much as a few years) or incomplete (partial and unusable) EF recovery commonly occurs in many men still today undergoing this surgery. "Penile rehabilitation", alternatively termed "EF rehabilitation", originated formally as a therapeutic practice approximately 15 years ago for addressing post-RP erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond conventional ED management. Although the premise of this therapy is conceptually sound and generally accepted, in reference to the implementation of strategies for promoting EF recovery to a naturally functional level in the absence of erectile aids (distinct from the premise of conventional ED management), the optimal manner and efficacy of currently suggested therapeutic strategies are far less established. Such strategies include regimens of standard ED-specific therapies (e.g., oral, intracavernosal, and intraurethral pharmacotherapies; vacuum erection device therapy) and courses of innovative interventions (e.g., statins, erythropoietin, angiotensin receptor blockers). An endeavor in evolution, erection rehabilitation may ideally comprise an integrative program of sexual health management incorporating counseling, coaching, guidance toward general health optimization and application of demonstrably effective "rehabilitative" interventions. Ongoing intensive discovery and rigorous investigation are required to establish efficacy of therapeutic prospects that fulfill the intent of post-RP erection rehabilitation.

AB - Erectile function (EF) recovery remains a prominent functional outcome underachievement of radical prostatectomy (RP), despite the success of anatomic "nerve-sparing" technique and its recent refinements in the modern surgical era. Delayed (for as much as a few years) or incomplete (partial and unusable) EF recovery commonly occurs in many men still today undergoing this surgery. "Penile rehabilitation", alternatively termed "EF rehabilitation", originated formally as a therapeutic practice approximately 15 years ago for addressing post-RP erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond conventional ED management. Although the premise of this therapy is conceptually sound and generally accepted, in reference to the implementation of strategies for promoting EF recovery to a naturally functional level in the absence of erectile aids (distinct from the premise of conventional ED management), the optimal manner and efficacy of currently suggested therapeutic strategies are far less established. Such strategies include regimens of standard ED-specific therapies (e.g., oral, intracavernosal, and intraurethral pharmacotherapies; vacuum erection device therapy) and courses of innovative interventions (e.g., statins, erythropoietin, angiotensin receptor blockers). An endeavor in evolution, erection rehabilitation may ideally comprise an integrative program of sexual health management incorporating counseling, coaching, guidance toward general health optimization and application of demonstrably effective "rehabilitative" interventions. Ongoing intensive discovery and rigorous investigation are required to establish efficacy of therapeutic prospects that fulfill the intent of post-RP erection rehabilitation.

KW - Erectile dysfunction

KW - Penile erection

KW - Pharmacotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901242419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901242419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.07

DO - 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.01.07

M3 - Article

C2 - 26816720

AN - SCOPUS:84901242419

VL - 2

SP - 24

EP - 31

JO - Translational Andrology and Urology

JF - Translational Andrology and Urology

SN - 2223-4683

IS - 1

ER -