CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: Surgical treatment outcomes

A. Lee Dellon, Eugenia Andonian, Gedge David Rosson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the "new" RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the "new" causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with "RSD" identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40% (16 of 40 patients), good in 40% (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20% (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47% (14 of 30 patients), good in 33% (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20% (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1
JournalJournal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 20 2009

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Joints
Neuroma
Pain
Skin
Nerve Block
Research Ethics Committees
Recovery of Function
Diagnostic Errors
Peripheral Nerves
Upper Extremity
Physical Examination
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

CRPS of the upper or lower extremity : Surgical treatment outcomes. / Dellon, A. Lee; Andonian, Eugenia; Rosson, Gedge David.

In: Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1, 20.02.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08e86257ebb04e99b9bb87e44313e8ef,
title = "CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: Surgical treatment outcomes",
abstract = "The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the {"}new{"} RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the {"}new{"} causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with {"}RSD{"} identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40{\%} (16 of 40 patients), good in 40{\%} (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20{\%} (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47{\%} (14 of 30 patients), good in 33{\%} (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20{\%} (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.",
author = "Dellon, {A. Lee} and Eugenia Andonian and Rosson, {Gedge David}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/1749-7221-4-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury",
issn = "1749-7221",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CRPS of the upper or lower extremity

T2 - Surgical treatment outcomes

AU - Dellon, A. Lee

AU - Andonian, Eugenia

AU - Rosson, Gedge David

PY - 2009/2/20

Y1 - 2009/2/20

N2 - The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the "new" RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the "new" causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with "RSD" identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40% (16 of 40 patients), good in 40% (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20% (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47% (14 of 30 patients), good in 33% (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20% (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.

AB - The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the "new" RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the "new" causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with "RSD" identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40% (16 of 40 patients), good in 40% (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20% (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47% (14 of 30 patients), good in 33% (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20% (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62149114890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62149114890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1749-7221-4-1

DO - 10.1186/1749-7221-4-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 19232118

AN - SCOPUS:62149114890

VL - 4

JO - Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury

JF - Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury

SN - 1749-7221

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -