Cross validation of the prognostic and diagnostic utility of tobacco craving in a general and a pregnant sample of treatment-seeking smokers

Ivan Berlin, Edward G. Singleton, Stephen J. Heishman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Valid and reliable brief measures of tobacco craving are necessary for research and clinical purposes. However, comparisons of the utility of single-item and brief multidimensional craving measures are scarce. Methods: We analyzed two tobacco craving measures, the French versions of the 12-item Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (FTCQ-12) and the single craving item on the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, in pregnant and non-pregnant (females and males) French smokers from two independent smoking cessation trials. Using data from pregnant smokers, we estimated first a prognostic model for each measure and compared their ability to predict relapse from one visit to the next. We next used cutoff values for both measures to determine how well craving distinguished current smokers from abstainers. For cross-validation, we tested how well the same cut-off values generalized to non-pregnant smokers. Results: Two FTCQ-12 factors (. Expectancy and Purposefulness) predicted smoking status; scores were higher in pregnant non-abstainers than abstainers. The sum of these two factors, FTCQ-12 risk score (RS), yielded higher sensitivity both in prognostic and diagnostic models than single-item MNWS craving. FTCQ-12 RS had higher sensitivity among pregnant than non-pregnant smokers. Specificity of both tobacco craving measures was similar among pregnant smokers, but higher with MNWS craving than with FTCQ-12 RS in non-pregnant smokers. Conclusions: FTCQ-12 RS and MNWS craving can be used together in clinical practice to rapidly predict smoking status. Interventions targeting Expectancy and Purposefulness may result in higher likelihood of abstinence, especially among pregnant smokers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-183
Number of pages10
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume154
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Nicotine
Smoking
Craving
Aptitude
Smoking Cessation
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Pregnant smokers
  • Prognosis
  • Screening
  • Smoking relapse
  • Tobacco craving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Cross validation of the prognostic and diagnostic utility of tobacco craving in a general and a pregnant sample of treatment-seeking smokers. / Berlin, Ivan; Singleton, Edward G.; Heishman, Stephen J.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 154, 01.09.2015, p. 174-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63d69fe6bae844789a86740c191624bf,
title = "Cross validation of the prognostic and diagnostic utility of tobacco craving in a general and a pregnant sample of treatment-seeking smokers",
abstract = "Background: Valid and reliable brief measures of tobacco craving are necessary for research and clinical purposes. However, comparisons of the utility of single-item and brief multidimensional craving measures are scarce. Methods: We analyzed two tobacco craving measures, the French versions of the 12-item Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (FTCQ-12) and the single craving item on the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, in pregnant and non-pregnant (females and males) French smokers from two independent smoking cessation trials. Using data from pregnant smokers, we estimated first a prognostic model for each measure and compared their ability to predict relapse from one visit to the next. We next used cutoff values for both measures to determine how well craving distinguished current smokers from abstainers. For cross-validation, we tested how well the same cut-off values generalized to non-pregnant smokers. Results: Two FTCQ-12 factors (. Expectancy and Purposefulness) predicted smoking status; scores were higher in pregnant non-abstainers than abstainers. The sum of these two factors, FTCQ-12 risk score (RS), yielded higher sensitivity both in prognostic and diagnostic models than single-item MNWS craving. FTCQ-12 RS had higher sensitivity among pregnant than non-pregnant smokers. Specificity of both tobacco craving measures was similar among pregnant smokers, but higher with MNWS craving than with FTCQ-12 RS in non-pregnant smokers. Conclusions: FTCQ-12 RS and MNWS craving can be used together in clinical practice to rapidly predict smoking status. Interventions targeting Expectancy and Purposefulness may result in higher likelihood of abstinence, especially among pregnant smokers.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Pregnant smokers, Prognosis, Screening, Smoking relapse, Tobacco craving",
author = "Ivan Berlin and Singleton, {Edward G.} and Heishman, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "174--183",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross validation of the prognostic and diagnostic utility of tobacco craving in a general and a pregnant sample of treatment-seeking smokers

AU - Berlin, Ivan

AU - Singleton, Edward G.

AU - Heishman, Stephen J.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background: Valid and reliable brief measures of tobacco craving are necessary for research and clinical purposes. However, comparisons of the utility of single-item and brief multidimensional craving measures are scarce. Methods: We analyzed two tobacco craving measures, the French versions of the 12-item Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (FTCQ-12) and the single craving item on the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, in pregnant and non-pregnant (females and males) French smokers from two independent smoking cessation trials. Using data from pregnant smokers, we estimated first a prognostic model for each measure and compared their ability to predict relapse from one visit to the next. We next used cutoff values for both measures to determine how well craving distinguished current smokers from abstainers. For cross-validation, we tested how well the same cut-off values generalized to non-pregnant smokers. Results: Two FTCQ-12 factors (. Expectancy and Purposefulness) predicted smoking status; scores were higher in pregnant non-abstainers than abstainers. The sum of these two factors, FTCQ-12 risk score (RS), yielded higher sensitivity both in prognostic and diagnostic models than single-item MNWS craving. FTCQ-12 RS had higher sensitivity among pregnant than non-pregnant smokers. Specificity of both tobacco craving measures was similar among pregnant smokers, but higher with MNWS craving than with FTCQ-12 RS in non-pregnant smokers. Conclusions: FTCQ-12 RS and MNWS craving can be used together in clinical practice to rapidly predict smoking status. Interventions targeting Expectancy and Purposefulness may result in higher likelihood of abstinence, especially among pregnant smokers.

AB - Background: Valid and reliable brief measures of tobacco craving are necessary for research and clinical purposes. However, comparisons of the utility of single-item and brief multidimensional craving measures are scarce. Methods: We analyzed two tobacco craving measures, the French versions of the 12-item Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (FTCQ-12) and the single craving item on the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, in pregnant and non-pregnant (females and males) French smokers from two independent smoking cessation trials. Using data from pregnant smokers, we estimated first a prognostic model for each measure and compared their ability to predict relapse from one visit to the next. We next used cutoff values for both measures to determine how well craving distinguished current smokers from abstainers. For cross-validation, we tested how well the same cut-off values generalized to non-pregnant smokers. Results: Two FTCQ-12 factors (. Expectancy and Purposefulness) predicted smoking status; scores were higher in pregnant non-abstainers than abstainers. The sum of these two factors, FTCQ-12 risk score (RS), yielded higher sensitivity both in prognostic and diagnostic models than single-item MNWS craving. FTCQ-12 RS had higher sensitivity among pregnant than non-pregnant smokers. Specificity of both tobacco craving measures was similar among pregnant smokers, but higher with MNWS craving than with FTCQ-12 RS in non-pregnant smokers. Conclusions: FTCQ-12 RS and MNWS craving can be used together in clinical practice to rapidly predict smoking status. Interventions targeting Expectancy and Purposefulness may result in higher likelihood of abstinence, especially among pregnant smokers.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Pregnant smokers

KW - Prognosis

KW - Screening

KW - Smoking relapse

KW - Tobacco craving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938956335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938956335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.034

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 26160457

AN - SCOPUS:84938956335

VL - 154

SP - 174

EP - 183

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

ER -