Cross-terminology mapping challenges

A demonstration using medication terminological systems

Himali Saitwal, David Qing, Stephen Jones, Elmer V. Bernstam, Christopher Chute, Todd R. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Standardized terminological systems for biomedical information have provided considerable benefits to biomedical applications and research. However, practical use of this information often requires mapping across terminological systems-a complex and time-consuming process. This paper demonstrates the complexity and challenges of mapping across terminological systems in the context of medication information. It provides a review of medication terminological systems and their linkages, then describes a case study in which we mapped proprietary medication codes from an electronic health record to SNOMED CT and the UMLS Metathesaurus. The goal was to create a polyhierarchical classification system for querying an i2b2 clinical data warehouse. We found that three methods were required to accurately map the majority of actively prescribed medications. Only 62.5% of source medication codes could be mapped automatically. The remaining codes were mapped using a combination of semi-automated string comparison with expert selection, and a completely manual approach. Compound drugs were especially difficult to map: only 7.5% could be mapped using the automatic method. General challenges to mapping across terminological systems include (1) the availability of up-to-date information to assess the suitability of a given terminological system for a particular use case, and to assess the quality and completeness of cross-terminology links; (2) the difficulty of correctly using complex, rapidly evolving, modern terminologies; (3) the time and effort required to complete and evaluate the mapping; (4) the need to address differences in granularity between the source and target terminologies; and (5) the need to continuously update the mapping as terminological systems evolve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-625
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medication Systems
Terminology
Unified Medical Language System
Demonstrations
Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine
Electronic Health Records
Information Systems
Biomedical Research
Data warehouses
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Health
Availability

Keywords

  • Medication terminological systems
  • Review of medication terminological systems
  • Standards
  • Terminology mapping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Cross-terminology mapping challenges : A demonstration using medication terminological systems. / Saitwal, Himali; Qing, David; Jones, Stephen; Bernstam, Elmer V.; Chute, Christopher; Johnson, Todd R.

In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 45, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 613-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saitwal, Himali ; Qing, David ; Jones, Stephen ; Bernstam, Elmer V. ; Chute, Christopher ; Johnson, Todd R. / Cross-terminology mapping challenges : A demonstration using medication terminological systems. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2012 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 613-625.
@article{b1fc45c338a3451aa4685c991e89eed2,
title = "Cross-terminology mapping challenges: A demonstration using medication terminological systems",
abstract = "Standardized terminological systems for biomedical information have provided considerable benefits to biomedical applications and research. However, practical use of this information often requires mapping across terminological systems-a complex and time-consuming process. This paper demonstrates the complexity and challenges of mapping across terminological systems in the context of medication information. It provides a review of medication terminological systems and their linkages, then describes a case study in which we mapped proprietary medication codes from an electronic health record to SNOMED CT and the UMLS Metathesaurus. The goal was to create a polyhierarchical classification system for querying an i2b2 clinical data warehouse. We found that three methods were required to accurately map the majority of actively prescribed medications. Only 62.5{\%} of source medication codes could be mapped automatically. The remaining codes were mapped using a combination of semi-automated string comparison with expert selection, and a completely manual approach. Compound drugs were especially difficult to map: only 7.5{\%} could be mapped using the automatic method. General challenges to mapping across terminological systems include (1) the availability of up-to-date information to assess the suitability of a given terminological system for a particular use case, and to assess the quality and completeness of cross-terminology links; (2) the difficulty of correctly using complex, rapidly evolving, modern terminologies; (3) the time and effort required to complete and evaluate the mapping; (4) the need to address differences in granularity between the source and target terminologies; and (5) the need to continuously update the mapping as terminological systems evolve.",
keywords = "Medication terminological systems, Review of medication terminological systems, Standards, Terminology mapping",
author = "Himali Saitwal and David Qing and Stephen Jones and Bernstam, {Elmer V.} and Christopher Chute and Johnson, {Todd R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "613--625",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
issn = "1532-0464",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-terminology mapping challenges

T2 - A demonstration using medication terminological systems

AU - Saitwal, Himali

AU - Qing, David

AU - Jones, Stephen

AU - Bernstam, Elmer V.

AU - Chute, Christopher

AU - Johnson, Todd R.

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Standardized terminological systems for biomedical information have provided considerable benefits to biomedical applications and research. However, practical use of this information often requires mapping across terminological systems-a complex and time-consuming process. This paper demonstrates the complexity and challenges of mapping across terminological systems in the context of medication information. It provides a review of medication terminological systems and their linkages, then describes a case study in which we mapped proprietary medication codes from an electronic health record to SNOMED CT and the UMLS Metathesaurus. The goal was to create a polyhierarchical classification system for querying an i2b2 clinical data warehouse. We found that three methods were required to accurately map the majority of actively prescribed medications. Only 62.5% of source medication codes could be mapped automatically. The remaining codes were mapped using a combination of semi-automated string comparison with expert selection, and a completely manual approach. Compound drugs were especially difficult to map: only 7.5% could be mapped using the automatic method. General challenges to mapping across terminological systems include (1) the availability of up-to-date information to assess the suitability of a given terminological system for a particular use case, and to assess the quality and completeness of cross-terminology links; (2) the difficulty of correctly using complex, rapidly evolving, modern terminologies; (3) the time and effort required to complete and evaluate the mapping; (4) the need to address differences in granularity between the source and target terminologies; and (5) the need to continuously update the mapping as terminological systems evolve.

AB - Standardized terminological systems for biomedical information have provided considerable benefits to biomedical applications and research. However, practical use of this information often requires mapping across terminological systems-a complex and time-consuming process. This paper demonstrates the complexity and challenges of mapping across terminological systems in the context of medication information. It provides a review of medication terminological systems and their linkages, then describes a case study in which we mapped proprietary medication codes from an electronic health record to SNOMED CT and the UMLS Metathesaurus. The goal was to create a polyhierarchical classification system for querying an i2b2 clinical data warehouse. We found that three methods were required to accurately map the majority of actively prescribed medications. Only 62.5% of source medication codes could be mapped automatically. The remaining codes were mapped using a combination of semi-automated string comparison with expert selection, and a completely manual approach. Compound drugs were especially difficult to map: only 7.5% could be mapped using the automatic method. General challenges to mapping across terminological systems include (1) the availability of up-to-date information to assess the suitability of a given terminological system for a particular use case, and to assess the quality and completeness of cross-terminology links; (2) the difficulty of correctly using complex, rapidly evolving, modern terminologies; (3) the time and effort required to complete and evaluate the mapping; (4) the need to address differences in granularity between the source and target terminologies; and (5) the need to continuously update the mapping as terminological systems evolve.

KW - Medication terminological systems

KW - Review of medication terminological systems

KW - Standards

KW - Terminology mapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865065603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865065603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 613

EP - 625

JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

SN - 1532-0464

IS - 4

ER -