Cross-design synthesis for extending the applicability of trial evidence when treatment effect is heterogeneous: Part I. Methodology

Ravi Varadhan, Nicholas C. Henderson, Carlos O. Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide reliable evidence for approval of new treatments, informing clinical practice, and coverage decisions. The participants in RCTs are often not a representative sample of the larger at-risk population. Hence, it is argued that the average treatment effect from the trial is not generalizable to the larger at-risk population. An essential premise of this argument is that there is significant heterogeneity in the treatment effect (HTE). We present a new method to extrapolate the treatment effect from a trial to a target group that is inadequately represented in the trial, when HTE is present. Our method integrates trial and observational data (cross-design synthesis). The target group is assumed to be well-represented in the observational database such that the observational study essentially acts as an “evidentiary bridge” that allows evidence to be transported from the trial sample to the target population. An essential component of the methodology is the estimation of calibration adjustments for unmeasured confounding in the observational sample. The estimate of treatment effect, adjusted for unmeasured confounding, is projected onto the target sample using a weighted G-computation approach. We present simulation studies to demonstrate the methodology for estimating the marginal treatment effect in a target sample that differs from the trial sample to varying degrees. In a companion article, we demonstrate and validate the methodology in a clinical application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-126
Number of pages15
JournalCommunications in Statistics Case Studies Data Analysis and Applications
Volume2
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Generalizability
  • heterogeneity
  • interaction
  • internal and external validity
  • observational data
  • real-world evidence
  • sensitivity analysis
  • unmeasured confounding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Analysis

Cite this