Critical Findings: Attempts at Reducing Notification Errors

Mona Shahriari, Li Liu, David Mark Yousem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose Ineffective communication of critical findings (CFs) is a patient safety issue. The aim of this study was to assess whether a feedback program for faculty members failing to correctly report CFs would lead to improved compliance. Methods Fifty randomly selected reports were reviewed by the chief of neuroradiology each month for 42 months. Errors included (1) not calling for a CF, (2) not identifying a CF as such, (3) mischaracterizing non-CFs as CFs, and (4) calling for non-CFs. The number of appropriately handled and mishandled reports in each month was recorded. The trend of error reduction after the division chief provided feedback in the subsequent months was evaluated, and the equality of time interval between errors was tested. Results Among 2,100 reports, 49 (2.3%) were handled inappropriately. Among non-CF reports, 98.97% (1,817 of 1,836) were appropriately not called and not flagged, and 88.64% (234 of 264) of CF reports were called and flagged appropriately. The error rate during the 11th through 32nd months of review (1.28%) was significantly lower than the error rate in the first 10 months of review (3.98%) (P =.001). This benefit lasted for 21 months. Conclusions Review and giving feedback to radiologists increased their compliance with the CF protocol and decreased deviations from standard operating procedures for about 2 years (from month 10 to month 32). Developing new ideas for improving CF policy compliance may be required at 2- to 3-year intervals to provide continuous quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1354-1358
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Guideline Adherence
Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Compliance
Communication
Radiologists

Keywords

  • communication
  • Critical findings
  • notification
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Critical Findings : Attempts at Reducing Notification Errors. / Shahriari, Mona; Liu, Li; Yousem, David Mark.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 13, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1354-1358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3d01b82037c492eab437871336c4324,
title = "Critical Findings: Attempts at Reducing Notification Errors",
abstract = "Purpose Ineffective communication of critical findings (CFs) is a patient safety issue. The aim of this study was to assess whether a feedback program for faculty members failing to correctly report CFs would lead to improved compliance. Methods Fifty randomly selected reports were reviewed by the chief of neuroradiology each month for 42 months. Errors included (1) not calling for a CF, (2) not identifying a CF as such, (3) mischaracterizing non-CFs as CFs, and (4) calling for non-CFs. The number of appropriately handled and mishandled reports in each month was recorded. The trend of error reduction after the division chief provided feedback in the subsequent months was evaluated, and the equality of time interval between errors was tested. Results Among 2,100 reports, 49 (2.3{\%}) were handled inappropriately. Among non-CF reports, 98.97{\%} (1,817 of 1,836) were appropriately not called and not flagged, and 88.64{\%} (234 of 264) of CF reports were called and flagged appropriately. The error rate during the 11th through 32nd months of review (1.28{\%}) was significantly lower than the error rate in the first 10 months of review (3.98{\%}) (P =.001). This benefit lasted for 21 months. Conclusions Review and giving feedback to radiologists increased their compliance with the CF protocol and decreased deviations from standard operating procedures for about 2 years (from month 10 to month 32). Developing new ideas for improving CF policy compliance may be required at 2- to 3-year intervals to provide continuous quality improvement.",
keywords = "communication, Critical findings, notification, quality improvement",
author = "Mona Shahriari and Li Liu and Yousem, {David Mark}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1354--1358",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Findings

T2 - Attempts at Reducing Notification Errors

AU - Shahriari, Mona

AU - Liu, Li

AU - Yousem, David Mark

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Purpose Ineffective communication of critical findings (CFs) is a patient safety issue. The aim of this study was to assess whether a feedback program for faculty members failing to correctly report CFs would lead to improved compliance. Methods Fifty randomly selected reports were reviewed by the chief of neuroradiology each month for 42 months. Errors included (1) not calling for a CF, (2) not identifying a CF as such, (3) mischaracterizing non-CFs as CFs, and (4) calling for non-CFs. The number of appropriately handled and mishandled reports in each month was recorded. The trend of error reduction after the division chief provided feedback in the subsequent months was evaluated, and the equality of time interval between errors was tested. Results Among 2,100 reports, 49 (2.3%) were handled inappropriately. Among non-CF reports, 98.97% (1,817 of 1,836) were appropriately not called and not flagged, and 88.64% (234 of 264) of CF reports were called and flagged appropriately. The error rate during the 11th through 32nd months of review (1.28%) was significantly lower than the error rate in the first 10 months of review (3.98%) (P =.001). This benefit lasted for 21 months. Conclusions Review and giving feedback to radiologists increased their compliance with the CF protocol and decreased deviations from standard operating procedures for about 2 years (from month 10 to month 32). Developing new ideas for improving CF policy compliance may be required at 2- to 3-year intervals to provide continuous quality improvement.

AB - Purpose Ineffective communication of critical findings (CFs) is a patient safety issue. The aim of this study was to assess whether a feedback program for faculty members failing to correctly report CFs would lead to improved compliance. Methods Fifty randomly selected reports were reviewed by the chief of neuroradiology each month for 42 months. Errors included (1) not calling for a CF, (2) not identifying a CF as such, (3) mischaracterizing non-CFs as CFs, and (4) calling for non-CFs. The number of appropriately handled and mishandled reports in each month was recorded. The trend of error reduction after the division chief provided feedback in the subsequent months was evaluated, and the equality of time interval between errors was tested. Results Among 2,100 reports, 49 (2.3%) were handled inappropriately. Among non-CF reports, 98.97% (1,817 of 1,836) were appropriately not called and not flagged, and 88.64% (234 of 264) of CF reports were called and flagged appropriately. The error rate during the 11th through 32nd months of review (1.28%) was significantly lower than the error rate in the first 10 months of review (3.98%) (P =.001). This benefit lasted for 21 months. Conclusions Review and giving feedback to radiologists increased their compliance with the CF protocol and decreased deviations from standard operating procedures for about 2 years (from month 10 to month 32). Developing new ideas for improving CF policy compliance may be required at 2- to 3-year intervals to provide continuous quality improvement.

KW - communication

KW - Critical findings

KW - notification

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994665905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994665905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.049

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.049

M3 - Article

C2 - 27567468

AN - SCOPUS:84994665905

VL - 13

SP - 1354

EP - 1358

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 11

ER -