Criteria of unresectability and the decision-making process

R. D. Schulick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Determination of the exact criteria for resectability in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and how they are most efficiently evaluated has many limitations. Among many factors taken into account in this decision-making process are: the condition of the patient, the biology of the disease, and the technical expertise of the surgeon and hospital. An attempt is made here to organize recommendations for the work-up of patients and the main criteria for resectability as best possible, keeping in mind that there will always be some limited room for exceptions, especially if the biology is favorable. Work-up and determination of resectability for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma are more straightforward than at the other two sites of the disease (perihilar and peripheral). In general, these follow the same principles as those for other periampullary carcinomas (pancreas, ampullary, and duodenal). The work-up and determination of resectability for patients with peripheral cholangiocacrcinoma can be relatively straightforward if the lesion is away from the hilus of the liver and does not involve a significant proportion of parenchyma, but can be problematic if it is more central or very large. Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are perhaps the most challenging, as factors such as patient condition, biology of the disease, local involvement of the major vessels and bile ducts at the hilum, and the future liver remnant all have a bearing in the decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-125
Number of pages4
JournalHPB
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Cholangiocarcinoma
Klatskin Tumor
Professional Competence
Liver
Bile Ducts
Pancreas
Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Resectability
  • Staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Criteria of unresectability and the decision-making process. / Schulick, R. D.

In: HPB, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008, p. 122-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schulick, R. D. / Criteria of unresectability and the decision-making process. In: HPB. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 122-125.
@article{43eb10146e324ec6bb673f8a88aa4757,
title = "Criteria of unresectability and the decision-making process",
abstract = "Determination of the exact criteria for resectability in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and how they are most efficiently evaluated has many limitations. Among many factors taken into account in this decision-making process are: the condition of the patient, the biology of the disease, and the technical expertise of the surgeon and hospital. An attempt is made here to organize recommendations for the work-up of patients and the main criteria for resectability as best possible, keeping in mind that there will always be some limited room for exceptions, especially if the biology is favorable. Work-up and determination of resectability for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma are more straightforward than at the other two sites of the disease (perihilar and peripheral). In general, these follow the same principles as those for other periampullary carcinomas (pancreas, ampullary, and duodenal). The work-up and determination of resectability for patients with peripheral cholangiocacrcinoma can be relatively straightforward if the lesion is away from the hilus of the liver and does not involve a significant proportion of parenchyma, but can be problematic if it is more central or very large. Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are perhaps the most challenging, as factors such as patient condition, biology of the disease, local involvement of the major vessels and bile ducts at the hilum, and the future liver remnant all have a bearing in the decision-making process.",
keywords = "Cholangiocarcinoma, Resectability, Staging",
author = "Schulick, {R. D.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13651820801993540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "122--125",
journal = "HPB",
issn = "1365-182X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria of unresectability and the decision-making process

AU - Schulick, R. D.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Determination of the exact criteria for resectability in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and how they are most efficiently evaluated has many limitations. Among many factors taken into account in this decision-making process are: the condition of the patient, the biology of the disease, and the technical expertise of the surgeon and hospital. An attempt is made here to organize recommendations for the work-up of patients and the main criteria for resectability as best possible, keeping in mind that there will always be some limited room for exceptions, especially if the biology is favorable. Work-up and determination of resectability for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma are more straightforward than at the other two sites of the disease (perihilar and peripheral). In general, these follow the same principles as those for other periampullary carcinomas (pancreas, ampullary, and duodenal). The work-up and determination of resectability for patients with peripheral cholangiocacrcinoma can be relatively straightforward if the lesion is away from the hilus of the liver and does not involve a significant proportion of parenchyma, but can be problematic if it is more central or very large. Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are perhaps the most challenging, as factors such as patient condition, biology of the disease, local involvement of the major vessels and bile ducts at the hilum, and the future liver remnant all have a bearing in the decision-making process.

AB - Determination of the exact criteria for resectability in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and how they are most efficiently evaluated has many limitations. Among many factors taken into account in this decision-making process are: the condition of the patient, the biology of the disease, and the technical expertise of the surgeon and hospital. An attempt is made here to organize recommendations for the work-up of patients and the main criteria for resectability as best possible, keeping in mind that there will always be some limited room for exceptions, especially if the biology is favorable. Work-up and determination of resectability for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma are more straightforward than at the other two sites of the disease (perihilar and peripheral). In general, these follow the same principles as those for other periampullary carcinomas (pancreas, ampullary, and duodenal). The work-up and determination of resectability for patients with peripheral cholangiocacrcinoma can be relatively straightforward if the lesion is away from the hilus of the liver and does not involve a significant proportion of parenchyma, but can be problematic if it is more central or very large. Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are perhaps the most challenging, as factors such as patient condition, biology of the disease, local involvement of the major vessels and bile ducts at the hilum, and the future liver remnant all have a bearing in the decision-making process.

KW - Cholangiocarcinoma

KW - Resectability

KW - Staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46649100695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46649100695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13651820801993540

DO - 10.1080/13651820801993540

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 122

EP - 125

JO - HPB

JF - HPB

SN - 1365-182X

IS - 2

ER -