Court outcomes among female juveniles with sexual offences

Jeremy Siegel, Rebecca Fix

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Female juveniles with sexual offences (FJSOs) are an understudied population. The current study compares FJSOs with their male counterparts and evaluates whether male and female juveniles with sexual offences from different family types have similar charges and court outcomes. Data were obtained from a statewide court dataset in Alabama from 2004 to 2014 (n = 205 females, 2816 males). Participants were categorised by offence category, family type, and court outcome. Chi-square tests and hierarchical logistic regressions were conducted to test for differences in offence patterns and court outcomes by gender and family type, respectively. Females committed less severe offences and received less severe punishments for a given offence compared with males. Family type and two-way interactions between family type, gender, and offence severity played limited roles in offence patterns and in court sentencing. Disposition patterns in females point towards the feasibility of providing more services for all juveniles with sexual offences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Sexual Aggression
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Punishment
Chi-Square Distribution
Logistic Models
Population
Datasets

Keywords

  • court outcomes
  • family types
  • female juvenile offenders
  • juvenile court
  • Juvenile sex offenders
  • juveniles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Court outcomes among female juveniles with sexual offences. / Siegel, Jeremy; Fix, Rebecca.

In: Journal of Sexual Aggression, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d17a60488de1485a8d29bbcb4b73d4ce,
title = "Court outcomes among female juveniles with sexual offences",
abstract = "Female juveniles with sexual offences (FJSOs) are an understudied population. The current study compares FJSOs with their male counterparts and evaluates whether male and female juveniles with sexual offences from different family types have similar charges and court outcomes. Data were obtained from a statewide court dataset in Alabama from 2004 to 2014 (n = 205 females, 2816 males). Participants were categorised by offence category, family type, and court outcome. Chi-square tests and hierarchical logistic regressions were conducted to test for differences in offence patterns and court outcomes by gender and family type, respectively. Females committed less severe offences and received less severe punishments for a given offence compared with males. Family type and two-way interactions between family type, gender, and offence severity played limited roles in offence patterns and in court sentencing. Disposition patterns in females point towards the feasibility of providing more services for all juveniles with sexual offences.",
keywords = "court outcomes, family types, female juvenile offenders, juvenile court, Juvenile sex offenders, juveniles",
author = "Jeremy Siegel and Rebecca Fix",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13552600.2019.1618932",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Sexual Aggression",
issn = "1355-2600",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Court outcomes among female juveniles with sexual offences

AU - Siegel, Jeremy

AU - Fix, Rebecca

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Female juveniles with sexual offences (FJSOs) are an understudied population. The current study compares FJSOs with their male counterparts and evaluates whether male and female juveniles with sexual offences from different family types have similar charges and court outcomes. Data were obtained from a statewide court dataset in Alabama from 2004 to 2014 (n = 205 females, 2816 males). Participants were categorised by offence category, family type, and court outcome. Chi-square tests and hierarchical logistic regressions were conducted to test for differences in offence patterns and court outcomes by gender and family type, respectively. Females committed less severe offences and received less severe punishments for a given offence compared with males. Family type and two-way interactions between family type, gender, and offence severity played limited roles in offence patterns and in court sentencing. Disposition patterns in females point towards the feasibility of providing more services for all juveniles with sexual offences.

AB - Female juveniles with sexual offences (FJSOs) are an understudied population. The current study compares FJSOs with their male counterparts and evaluates whether male and female juveniles with sexual offences from different family types have similar charges and court outcomes. Data were obtained from a statewide court dataset in Alabama from 2004 to 2014 (n = 205 females, 2816 males). Participants were categorised by offence category, family type, and court outcome. Chi-square tests and hierarchical logistic regressions were conducted to test for differences in offence patterns and court outcomes by gender and family type, respectively. Females committed less severe offences and received less severe punishments for a given offence compared with males. Family type and two-way interactions between family type, gender, and offence severity played limited roles in offence patterns and in court sentencing. Disposition patterns in females point towards the feasibility of providing more services for all juveniles with sexual offences.

KW - court outcomes

KW - family types

KW - female juvenile offenders

KW - juvenile court

KW - Juvenile sex offenders

KW - juveniles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067898943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067898943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13552600.2019.1618932

DO - 10.1080/13552600.2019.1618932

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067898943

JO - Journal of Sexual Aggression

JF - Journal of Sexual Aggression

SN - 1355-2600

ER -