Couples' experiences with prostate cancer

focus group research.

Janet Harden, Ann Schafenacker, Laurel Northouse, Darlene Mood, David Smith, Kenneth Pienta, Maha Hussain, Karen Baranowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of couples living with prostate cancer, the impact of the illness on their quality of life, their ability to manage symptoms, and their suggestions for interventions that would help them to improve their daily experiences. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: Six focus groups were used to obtain the data; two were patient-only groups, two were spouse-caregiver groups, and two were dyad groups. The focus groups were conducted at two comprehensive cancer centers in the midwestern region of the United States. SAMPLE: 42 participants: 22 men with prostate cancer and 20 spouse-caregivers. METHODS: Focus group discussions were tape-recorded, and the content was analyzed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Quality of life, symptom experience, and areas for intervention. FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from the data: enduring uncertainty, living with treatment effects, coping with changes, and needing help. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had a need for information and support. Both men and spouse-caregivers felt unprepared to manage treatment effects. Symptoms had a broad effect on couples, not just men. Positive effects of the illness, as well as negative effects, emerged from the themes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Attention needs to be given to methods of providing information and support to couples coping with prostate cancer. Both patients and partners need to be included in discussions about the effect of the illness and treatments so that both can feel more prepared to manage them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-709
Number of pages9
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume29
Issue number4
StatePublished - May 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Caregivers
Prostatic Neoplasms
Midwestern United States
Research
Quality of Life
Aptitude
Life Change Events
Uncertainty
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Harden, J., Schafenacker, A., Northouse, L., Mood, D., Smith, D., Pienta, K., ... Baranowski, K. (2002). Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29(4), 701-709.

Couples' experiences with prostate cancer : focus group research. / Harden, Janet; Schafenacker, Ann; Northouse, Laurel; Mood, Darlene; Smith, David; Pienta, Kenneth; Hussain, Maha; Baranowski, Karen.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 29, No. 4, 05.2002, p. 701-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harden, J, Schafenacker, A, Northouse, L, Mood, D, Smith, D, Pienta, K, Hussain, M & Baranowski, K 2002, 'Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research.', Oncology Nursing Forum, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 701-709.
Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse L, Mood D, Smith D, Pienta K et al. Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2002 May;29(4):701-709.
Harden, Janet ; Schafenacker, Ann ; Northouse, Laurel ; Mood, Darlene ; Smith, David ; Pienta, Kenneth ; Hussain, Maha ; Baranowski, Karen. / Couples' experiences with prostate cancer : focus group research. In: Oncology Nursing Forum. 2002 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 701-709.
@article{19ccdbd4ccf34e44bfa5d0755022fa49,
title = "Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research.",
abstract = "PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of couples living with prostate cancer, the impact of the illness on their quality of life, their ability to manage symptoms, and their suggestions for interventions that would help them to improve their daily experiences. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: Six focus groups were used to obtain the data; two were patient-only groups, two were spouse-caregiver groups, and two were dyad groups. The focus groups were conducted at two comprehensive cancer centers in the midwestern region of the United States. SAMPLE: 42 participants: 22 men with prostate cancer and 20 spouse-caregivers. METHODS: Focus group discussions were tape-recorded, and the content was analyzed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Quality of life, symptom experience, and areas for intervention. FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from the data: enduring uncertainty, living with treatment effects, coping with changes, and needing help. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had a need for information and support. Both men and spouse-caregivers felt unprepared to manage treatment effects. Symptoms had a broad effect on couples, not just men. Positive effects of the illness, as well as negative effects, emerged from the themes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Attention needs to be given to methods of providing information and support to couples coping with prostate cancer. Both patients and partners need to be included in discussions about the effect of the illness and treatments so that both can feel more prepared to manage them.",
author = "Janet Harden and Ann Schafenacker and Laurel Northouse and Darlene Mood and David Smith and Kenneth Pienta and Maha Hussain and Karen Baranowski",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "701--709",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "0190-535X",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Couples' experiences with prostate cancer

T2 - focus group research.

AU - Harden, Janet

AU - Schafenacker, Ann

AU - Northouse, Laurel

AU - Mood, Darlene

AU - Smith, David

AU - Pienta, Kenneth

AU - Hussain, Maha

AU - Baranowski, Karen

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of couples living with prostate cancer, the impact of the illness on their quality of life, their ability to manage symptoms, and their suggestions for interventions that would help them to improve their daily experiences. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: Six focus groups were used to obtain the data; two were patient-only groups, two were spouse-caregiver groups, and two were dyad groups. The focus groups were conducted at two comprehensive cancer centers in the midwestern region of the United States. SAMPLE: 42 participants: 22 men with prostate cancer and 20 spouse-caregivers. METHODS: Focus group discussions were tape-recorded, and the content was analyzed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Quality of life, symptom experience, and areas for intervention. FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from the data: enduring uncertainty, living with treatment effects, coping with changes, and needing help. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had a need for information and support. Both men and spouse-caregivers felt unprepared to manage treatment effects. Symptoms had a broad effect on couples, not just men. Positive effects of the illness, as well as negative effects, emerged from the themes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Attention needs to be given to methods of providing information and support to couples coping with prostate cancer. Both patients and partners need to be included in discussions about the effect of the illness and treatments so that both can feel more prepared to manage them.

AB - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of couples living with prostate cancer, the impact of the illness on their quality of life, their ability to manage symptoms, and their suggestions for interventions that would help them to improve their daily experiences. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: Six focus groups were used to obtain the data; two were patient-only groups, two were spouse-caregiver groups, and two were dyad groups. The focus groups were conducted at two comprehensive cancer centers in the midwestern region of the United States. SAMPLE: 42 participants: 22 men with prostate cancer and 20 spouse-caregivers. METHODS: Focus group discussions were tape-recorded, and the content was analyzed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Quality of life, symptom experience, and areas for intervention. FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from the data: enduring uncertainty, living with treatment effects, coping with changes, and needing help. CONCLUSIONS: Participants had a need for information and support. Both men and spouse-caregivers felt unprepared to manage treatment effects. Symptoms had a broad effect on couples, not just men. Positive effects of the illness, as well as negative effects, emerged from the themes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Attention needs to be given to methods of providing information and support to couples coping with prostate cancer. Both patients and partners need to be included in discussions about the effect of the illness and treatments so that both can feel more prepared to manage them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036585041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036585041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 701

EP - 709

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 0190-535X

IS - 4

ER -