Costing essential services package provided by a non-governmental organization network in Bangladesh

Wu Zeng, Yara A. Halasa, Marion Cros, Halida Akhter, Allyala Krishna Nandakumar, Donald S. Shepard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The health profile of Bangladesh has improved remarkably, yet gaps in delivering quality health care remain. In response to the need for evidence to quantify resources for providing health services in Bangladesh, this study estimates unit costs of providing the essential services package (ESP) in the not-for-profit sector. This study used a stratified sampling approach to select 18 static clinics, which had fixed facilities, from 330 non-profit clinics under Smiling Sun network in Bangladesh. Costs were estimated from the providers' perspective, using both top-down and bottom-up methods, from July 2014 to June 2015. In total, there were 1115 observations (clients) for the 13 primary care services analysed. The estimated 2015 average costs per visit were: Antenatal care ($7.03), postnatal care ($4.57), control of diarrheal diseases ($1.32), acute respiratory infection ($1.53), integrated management of child illness ($2.02), sexually transmitted infections ($4.70), reproductive tract infections ($3.56), tuberculosis ($41.65), limited curative care ($4.30), immunization ($2.23), family planning ($0.72), births by normal delivery ($29.45) and C-section ($114.83). Unit costs varied widely for each service, both between individual patients and among clinic level means. The coefficient of variation for the 13 services averaged 66%, implying potential inefficiencies. In addition, 32.9% of clients were not offered any lab test during the first antenatal visit. The unit cost of essential services differed by the type and location of clinics. Ultra clinics, on average, incurred 37% higher costs than vital (outpatient type) clinics, and urban clinics spent 40% more than rural clinics to deliver a unit of service. The study suggests that inefficiency and quality concerns exist in health service delivery in some facilities. Increasing the volume of clients through demand-side mechanisms and standardization of services would help address those concerns. Unit costs of services provide essential information for estimating resource needs for scaling up the ESPs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1375-1385
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bangladesh
Organizations
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Services
Smiling
Postnatal Care
Reproductive Tract Infections
Prenatal Care
Quality of Health Care
Family Planning Services
Acute Disease
Solar System
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Respiratory Tract Infections
Immunization
Primary Health Care
Tuberculosis
Parturition
Health

Keywords

  • Bangladesh
  • Costing
  • essential services package
  • maternal and child services
  • unit cost

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Costing essential services package provided by a non-governmental organization network in Bangladesh. / Zeng, Wu; Halasa, Yara A.; Cros, Marion; Akhter, Halida; Nandakumar, Allyala Krishna; Shepard, Donald S.

In: Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 32, No. 10, 01.12.2017, p. 1375-1385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zeng, Wu ; Halasa, Yara A. ; Cros, Marion ; Akhter, Halida ; Nandakumar, Allyala Krishna ; Shepard, Donald S. / Costing essential services package provided by a non-governmental organization network in Bangladesh. In: Health Policy and Planning. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 1375-1385.
@article{ee6bade25ea240a3811393e547b12420,
title = "Costing essential services package provided by a non-governmental organization network in Bangladesh",
abstract = "The health profile of Bangladesh has improved remarkably, yet gaps in delivering quality health care remain. In response to the need for evidence to quantify resources for providing health services in Bangladesh, this study estimates unit costs of providing the essential services package (ESP) in the not-for-profit sector. This study used a stratified sampling approach to select 18 static clinics, which had fixed facilities, from 330 non-profit clinics under Smiling Sun network in Bangladesh. Costs were estimated from the providers' perspective, using both top-down and bottom-up methods, from July 2014 to June 2015. In total, there were 1115 observations (clients) for the 13 primary care services analysed. The estimated 2015 average costs per visit were: Antenatal care ($7.03), postnatal care ($4.57), control of diarrheal diseases ($1.32), acute respiratory infection ($1.53), integrated management of child illness ($2.02), sexually transmitted infections ($4.70), reproductive tract infections ($3.56), tuberculosis ($41.65), limited curative care ($4.30), immunization ($2.23), family planning ($0.72), births by normal delivery ($29.45) and C-section ($114.83). Unit costs varied widely for each service, both between individual patients and among clinic level means. The coefficient of variation for the 13 services averaged 66{\%}, implying potential inefficiencies. In addition, 32.9{\%} of clients were not offered any lab test during the first antenatal visit. The unit cost of essential services differed by the type and location of clinics. Ultra clinics, on average, incurred 37{\%} higher costs than vital (outpatient type) clinics, and urban clinics spent 40{\%} more than rural clinics to deliver a unit of service. The study suggests that inefficiency and quality concerns exist in health service delivery in some facilities. Increasing the volume of clients through demand-side mechanisms and standardization of services would help address those concerns. Unit costs of services provide essential information for estimating resource needs for scaling up the ESPs.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, Costing, essential services package, maternal and child services, unit cost",
author = "Wu Zeng and Halasa, {Yara A.} and Marion Cros and Halida Akhter and Nandakumar, {Allyala Krishna} and Shepard, {Donald S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/heapol/czx105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1375--1385",
journal = "Health Policy and Planning",
issn = "0268-1080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Costing essential services package provided by a non-governmental organization network in Bangladesh

AU - Zeng, Wu

AU - Halasa, Yara A.

AU - Cros, Marion

AU - Akhter, Halida

AU - Nandakumar, Allyala Krishna

AU - Shepard, Donald S.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - The health profile of Bangladesh has improved remarkably, yet gaps in delivering quality health care remain. In response to the need for evidence to quantify resources for providing health services in Bangladesh, this study estimates unit costs of providing the essential services package (ESP) in the not-for-profit sector. This study used a stratified sampling approach to select 18 static clinics, which had fixed facilities, from 330 non-profit clinics under Smiling Sun network in Bangladesh. Costs were estimated from the providers' perspective, using both top-down and bottom-up methods, from July 2014 to June 2015. In total, there were 1115 observations (clients) for the 13 primary care services analysed. The estimated 2015 average costs per visit were: Antenatal care ($7.03), postnatal care ($4.57), control of diarrheal diseases ($1.32), acute respiratory infection ($1.53), integrated management of child illness ($2.02), sexually transmitted infections ($4.70), reproductive tract infections ($3.56), tuberculosis ($41.65), limited curative care ($4.30), immunization ($2.23), family planning ($0.72), births by normal delivery ($29.45) and C-section ($114.83). Unit costs varied widely for each service, both between individual patients and among clinic level means. The coefficient of variation for the 13 services averaged 66%, implying potential inefficiencies. In addition, 32.9% of clients were not offered any lab test during the first antenatal visit. The unit cost of essential services differed by the type and location of clinics. Ultra clinics, on average, incurred 37% higher costs than vital (outpatient type) clinics, and urban clinics spent 40% more than rural clinics to deliver a unit of service. The study suggests that inefficiency and quality concerns exist in health service delivery in some facilities. Increasing the volume of clients through demand-side mechanisms and standardization of services would help address those concerns. Unit costs of services provide essential information for estimating resource needs for scaling up the ESPs.

AB - The health profile of Bangladesh has improved remarkably, yet gaps in delivering quality health care remain. In response to the need for evidence to quantify resources for providing health services in Bangladesh, this study estimates unit costs of providing the essential services package (ESP) in the not-for-profit sector. This study used a stratified sampling approach to select 18 static clinics, which had fixed facilities, from 330 non-profit clinics under Smiling Sun network in Bangladesh. Costs were estimated from the providers' perspective, using both top-down and bottom-up methods, from July 2014 to June 2015. In total, there were 1115 observations (clients) for the 13 primary care services analysed. The estimated 2015 average costs per visit were: Antenatal care ($7.03), postnatal care ($4.57), control of diarrheal diseases ($1.32), acute respiratory infection ($1.53), integrated management of child illness ($2.02), sexually transmitted infections ($4.70), reproductive tract infections ($3.56), tuberculosis ($41.65), limited curative care ($4.30), immunization ($2.23), family planning ($0.72), births by normal delivery ($29.45) and C-section ($114.83). Unit costs varied widely for each service, both between individual patients and among clinic level means. The coefficient of variation for the 13 services averaged 66%, implying potential inefficiencies. In addition, 32.9% of clients were not offered any lab test during the first antenatal visit. The unit cost of essential services differed by the type and location of clinics. Ultra clinics, on average, incurred 37% higher costs than vital (outpatient type) clinics, and urban clinics spent 40% more than rural clinics to deliver a unit of service. The study suggests that inefficiency and quality concerns exist in health service delivery in some facilities. Increasing the volume of clients through demand-side mechanisms and standardization of services would help address those concerns. Unit costs of services provide essential information for estimating resource needs for scaling up the ESPs.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - Costing

KW - essential services package

KW - maternal and child services

KW - unit cost

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040691046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040691046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/heapol/czx105

DO - 10.1093/heapol/czx105

M3 - Article

C2 - 28973120

AN - SCOPUS:85040691046

VL - 32

SP - 1375

EP - 1385

JO - Health Policy and Planning

JF - Health Policy and Planning

SN - 0268-1080

IS - 10

ER -