TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube versus tuberculin skin test for diagnosis and treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in primary health care workers in Brazil
AU - Loureiro, Rafaela Borge
AU - Maciel, Ethel Leonor Noia
AU - Caetano, Rosangela
AU - Peres, Renata Lyrio
AU - Fregona, Geisa
AU - Golub, Jonathan E.
AU - Braga, José Ueleres
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico) MCT/CNPq No. 14/2009 ? Universal and by the International Clinical, Operational and Health Services Research Training Award grant ? ICOHRTA [AIDS/TB]. None of the funding agencies is responsible for the statements in this article. The funders had no role in study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Objectives The goal of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the public health system perspective, comparing five strategies for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) diagnosis in primary health care workers in Brazil. Design Analytical model for decision making, characterized by cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting Primary Care Level, considering primary health care workers in Brazil. Participants An analytical model for decision making, characterized by a tree of probabilities of events, was developed considering a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 primary health care workers, using the software TreeAge Pro™ 2013 to simulate the clinical and economic impacts of new diagnostic technology (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-Tube) versus the traditional tuberculin skin test. Methods This model simulated five diagnostic strategies for LTBI in primary health care workers (HCW) in Brazil: tuberculin skin testing using ≥5 mm cut-off, tuberculin skin testing ≥10 mm cut-off, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-Tube, tuberculin skin testing using ≥5 mm cut-off confirmed by QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube if TST positive, tuberculin skin testing using ≥10 mm cut-off confirmed by QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube if TST positive. Primary and secondary outcome measures The outcome measures are the number of individuals correctly classified by the test and the number of Tuberculosis cases avoided. Results The most cost-effective strategy was the tuberculin skin test considering ≥10mm cut-off. The isolated use of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube revealed the strategy of lower efficiency with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 146.05 for each HCW correctly classified by the test. Conclusions The tuberculin skin test using ≥10 mm cut-off was the most cost-effective strategy in the diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in primary health care works in Brazil.
AB - Objectives The goal of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the public health system perspective, comparing five strategies for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) diagnosis in primary health care workers in Brazil. Design Analytical model for decision making, characterized by cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting Primary Care Level, considering primary health care workers in Brazil. Participants An analytical model for decision making, characterized by a tree of probabilities of events, was developed considering a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 primary health care workers, using the software TreeAge Pro™ 2013 to simulate the clinical and economic impacts of new diagnostic technology (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-Tube) versus the traditional tuberculin skin test. Methods This model simulated five diagnostic strategies for LTBI in primary health care workers (HCW) in Brazil: tuberculin skin testing using ≥5 mm cut-off, tuberculin skin testing ≥10 mm cut-off, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold in-Tube, tuberculin skin testing using ≥5 mm cut-off confirmed by QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube if TST positive, tuberculin skin testing using ≥10 mm cut-off confirmed by QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube if TST positive. Primary and secondary outcome measures The outcome measures are the number of individuals correctly classified by the test and the number of Tuberculosis cases avoided. Results The most cost-effective strategy was the tuberculin skin test considering ≥10mm cut-off. The isolated use of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube revealed the strategy of lower efficiency with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 146.05 for each HCW correctly classified by the test. Conclusions The tuberculin skin test using ≥10 mm cut-off was the most cost-effective strategy in the diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in primary health care works in Brazil.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075114675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075114675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0225197
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0225197
M3 - Article
C2 - 31725786
AN - SCOPUS:85075114675
VL - 14
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 11
M1 - e0225197
ER -