Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol and prenatal iron supplementation as maternal mortality interventions in home births in rural India

Tori Sutherland, David M. Bishai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of prenatal iron supplementation and misoprostol use as interventions to prevent maternal mortality in home births in rural India. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis depicted three hypothetical cohorts of 10 000 pregnant women delivering at home in rural India: one with no intervention, one receiving standard prenatal iron supplements, and 1 receiving 600 μg of misoprostol in the third stage of labor. Results: Misoprostol used to prevent postpartum hemorrhage resulted in a 38% (95% CI, 5%-73%) decrease in maternal deaths, while prenatal iron supplementation resulted in a 5% (95% CI, 0%-47%) decrease. Misoprostol cost a median US $1401 (IQR US $1008-$1848) prenatal iron supplementation cost a median US $2241 (IQR No Lives Saved-$3882) per life saved compared with the standard care outcome. Conclusion: Misoprostol is a cost-effective maternal mortality intervention for home births. Iron supplementation may be worthwhile to improve women's health, but it is uncertain whether it can prevent mortality after hemorrhage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-193
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Home birth
  • Iron supplementation
  • Maternal mortality
  • Misoprostol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol and prenatal iron supplementation as maternal mortality interventions in home births in rural India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this