Corrigendum to “Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury” [Neuropsychologia 124 (2019) 1–8](S0028393218305712)(10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001)

Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Zachary R. Kachian, Frank Krueger, Barry Gordon, Jordan Grafman

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Instead of “with left hemisphere damage better than it did for right hemisphere damage patients” should be “with left hemisphere brain damage better than it did for patients with right hemisphere brain damage”. Introduction. Section 1.1. Instead of “upon enlistment to the army” should be “upon enlistment in the army”. Materials and Methods. Section 2.3.2. Instead of “and is divided to four domains” should be “and is divided into four domains”. Section 2.4. Instead of “… VHIS, therefore we did not see the same pattern of participant attrition that is commonly seen in longitudinal studies. We had the most data on AFQT scores for participants in …” should be “VHIS. We had AFQT scores for theses participants in …“. Section 2.5. Instead of “were found when testing for pre injury” should be “were found for AFQT testing at the pre-injury”. Instead of “analyses of variances” should be “analyses of variance”. Results. Section 3.2. Instead of “Given that VHIS group (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) violated …” should be “Given that the VHIS (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) data violated …” Section 3.4. Instead of “Again, we found main effect for SES groups as well as SES and laterality interaction” should be “Again, we found a main effect for SES groups as well as a SES and laterality interaction”. Discussion. Instead of “15, 30 and 42 years post-injury” should be “15, 35 and 40 + years post-injury”. Instead of “neurologically healthy population” should be “neurologically healthy samples”. Instead of “Similarly, The finding” should be “Similarly, the finding”. Instead of “we did not find such association” should be “we did not find such an association”. Section 4.1. Instead of “index for SES” should be “index of SES”. Figure 2 legend. Addition in the end: “Legend indicates the number of patients with damage to a voxel”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107142
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume134
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Class
Wounds and Injuries
Analysis of Variance
Control Groups
Brain
Patient Rights
Longitudinal Studies
corrigendum
Traumatic Brain Injury
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Corrigendum to “Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury” [Neuropsychologia 124 (2019) 1–8](S0028393218305712)(10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001). / Cohen-Zimerman, Shira; Kachian, Zachary R.; Krueger, Frank; Gordon, Barry; Grafman, Jordan.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 134, 107142, 01.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{77802f5b2481401fb197ad6b6e0e49b2,
title = "Corrigendum to “Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury” [Neuropsychologia 124 (2019) 1–8](S0028393218305712)(10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001)",
abstract = "Instead of “with left hemisphere damage better than it did for right hemisphere damage patients” should be “with left hemisphere brain damage better than it did for patients with right hemisphere brain damage”. Introduction. Section 1.1. Instead of “upon enlistment to the army” should be “upon enlistment in the army”. Materials and Methods. Section 2.3.2. Instead of “and is divided to four domains” should be “and is divided into four domains”. Section 2.4. Instead of “… VHIS, therefore we did not see the same pattern of participant attrition that is commonly seen in longitudinal studies. We had the most data on AFQT scores for participants in …” should be “VHIS. We had AFQT scores for theses participants in …“. Section 2.5. Instead of “were found when testing for pre injury” should be “were found for AFQT testing at the pre-injury”. Instead of “analyses of variances” should be “analyses of variance”. Results. Section 3.2. Instead of “Given that VHIS group (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) violated …” should be “Given that the VHIS (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) data violated …” Section 3.4. Instead of “Again, we found main effect for SES groups as well as SES and laterality interaction” should be “Again, we found a main effect for SES groups as well as a SES and laterality interaction”. Discussion. Instead of “15, 30 and 42 years post-injury” should be “15, 35 and 40 + years post-injury”. Instead of “neurologically healthy population” should be “neurologically healthy samples”. Instead of “Similarly, The finding” should be “Similarly, the finding”. Instead of “we did not find such association” should be “we did not find such an association”. Section 4.1. Instead of “index for SES” should be “index of SES”. Figure 2 legend. Addition in the end: “Legend indicates the number of patients with damage to a voxel”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",
author = "Shira Cohen-Zimerman and Kachian, {Zachary R.} and Frank Krueger and Barry Gordon and Jordan Grafman",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury” [Neuropsychologia 124 (2019) 1–8](S0028393218305712)(10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001)

AU - Cohen-Zimerman, Shira

AU - Kachian, Zachary R.

AU - Krueger, Frank

AU - Gordon, Barry

AU - Grafman, Jordan

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Instead of “with left hemisphere damage better than it did for right hemisphere damage patients” should be “with left hemisphere brain damage better than it did for patients with right hemisphere brain damage”. Introduction. Section 1.1. Instead of “upon enlistment to the army” should be “upon enlistment in the army”. Materials and Methods. Section 2.3.2. Instead of “and is divided to four domains” should be “and is divided into four domains”. Section 2.4. Instead of “… VHIS, therefore we did not see the same pattern of participant attrition that is commonly seen in longitudinal studies. We had the most data on AFQT scores for participants in …” should be “VHIS. We had AFQT scores for theses participants in …“. Section 2.5. Instead of “were found when testing for pre injury” should be “were found for AFQT testing at the pre-injury”. Instead of “analyses of variances” should be “analyses of variance”. Results. Section 3.2. Instead of “Given that VHIS group (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) violated …” should be “Given that the VHIS (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) data violated …” Section 3.4. Instead of “Again, we found main effect for SES groups as well as SES and laterality interaction” should be “Again, we found a main effect for SES groups as well as a SES and laterality interaction”. Discussion. Instead of “15, 30 and 42 years post-injury” should be “15, 35 and 40 + years post-injury”. Instead of “neurologically healthy population” should be “neurologically healthy samples”. Instead of “Similarly, The finding” should be “Similarly, the finding”. Instead of “we did not find such association” should be “we did not find such an association”. Section 4.1. Instead of “index for SES” should be “index of SES”. Figure 2 legend. Addition in the end: “Legend indicates the number of patients with damage to a voxel”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - Instead of “with left hemisphere damage better than it did for right hemisphere damage patients” should be “with left hemisphere brain damage better than it did for patients with right hemisphere brain damage”. Introduction. Section 1.1. Instead of “upon enlistment to the army” should be “upon enlistment in the army”. Materials and Methods. Section 2.3.2. Instead of “and is divided to four domains” should be “and is divided into four domains”. Section 2.4. Instead of “… VHIS, therefore we did not see the same pattern of participant attrition that is commonly seen in longitudinal studies. We had the most data on AFQT scores for participants in …” should be “VHIS. We had AFQT scores for theses participants in …“. Section 2.5. Instead of “were found when testing for pre injury” should be “were found for AFQT testing at the pre-injury”. Instead of “analyses of variances” should be “analyses of variance”. Results. Section 3.2. Instead of “Given that VHIS group (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) violated …” should be “Given that the VHIS (pTBI vs. Control) and SES group (low vs. mid-high) data violated …” Section 3.4. Instead of “Again, we found main effect for SES groups as well as SES and laterality interaction” should be “Again, we found a main effect for SES groups as well as a SES and laterality interaction”. Discussion. Instead of “15, 30 and 42 years post-injury” should be “15, 35 and 40 + years post-injury”. Instead of “neurologically healthy population” should be “neurologically healthy samples”. Instead of “Similarly, The finding” should be “Similarly, the finding”. Instead of “we did not find such association” should be “we did not find such an association”. Section 4.1. Instead of “index for SES” should be “index of SES”. Figure 2 legend. Addition in the end: “Legend indicates the number of patients with damage to a voxel”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073102636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073102636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107142

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107142

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 31614227

AN - SCOPUS:85073102636

VL - 134

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

M1 - 107142

ER -