Coping with burn injury: Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications

James A Fauerbach, Melissa G. Bresnick, Michael T Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The level of evidence accrued to date precludes definitive recommendations. However, tentative recommendations can be offered in light of the knowledge gathered up to this point. First, the psychosocial care of individuals with burn injuries must be universally available and must incorporate routine assessment during the acute care phase. Second, assessment should include pre-injury level of health and function, history of psychological distress, and social support, as well as several indices of psychological distress (e.g., depression, posttraumatic distress, body image dissatisfaction), methods of coping with the burn injury and its complications, and, identifying health-promoting individual strengths (e.g., self-efficacy, resilience, optimism) and social resources. Third, intervention during hospitalization (versus after discharge) is probably optimal because the distress is severe, openness to care is enhanced, concern with stigmatization is reduced, and access to services is more universal than it will ever be following discharge. Fourth, interventions that focus on enhancing coping skills and improving physical and psychological resilience/efficacy/ competence are likely to be welcomed, useful, and most likely be of continued enduring benefit. Finally, in order to develop evidence-based practice, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies (e.g., randomized, controlled trials), testing such interventions in the burn-injured population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCoping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects
PublisherSpringer US
Pages173-190
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)9780387486680
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Psychological Resilience
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Stereotyping
Evidence-Based Practice
Body Image
Psychological Adaptation
Self Efficacy
Burns
Social Support
Mental Competency
Health Status
Hospitalization
Randomized Controlled Trials
Depression
Health
Population
Optimism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Fauerbach, J. A., Bresnick, M. G., & Smith, M. T. (2007). Coping with burn injury: Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications. In Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects (pp. 173-190). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9

Coping with burn injury : Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications. / Fauerbach, James A; Bresnick, Melissa G.; Smith, Michael T.

Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects. Springer US, 2007. p. 173-190.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Fauerbach, JA, Bresnick, MG & Smith, MT 2007, Coping with burn injury: Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications. in Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects. Springer US, pp. 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9
Fauerbach JA, Bresnick MG, Smith MT. Coping with burn injury: Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications. In Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects. Springer US. 2007. p. 173-190 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9
Fauerbach, James A ; Bresnick, Melissa G. ; Smith, Michael T. / Coping with burn injury : Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications. Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects. Springer US, 2007. pp. 173-190
@inbook{9d37426ab82a47da91f4b96e44fc8e24,
title = "Coping with burn injury: Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications",
abstract = "The level of evidence accrued to date precludes definitive recommendations. However, tentative recommendations can be offered in light of the knowledge gathered up to this point. First, the psychosocial care of individuals with burn injuries must be universally available and must incorporate routine assessment during the acute care phase. Second, assessment should include pre-injury level of health and function, history of psychological distress, and social support, as well as several indices of psychological distress (e.g., depression, posttraumatic distress, body image dissatisfaction), methods of coping with the burn injury and its complications, and, identifying health-promoting individual strengths (e.g., self-efficacy, resilience, optimism) and social resources. Third, intervention during hospitalization (versus after discharge) is probably optimal because the distress is severe, openness to care is enhanced, concern with stigmatization is reduced, and access to services is more universal than it will ever be following discharge. Fourth, interventions that focus on enhancing coping skills and improving physical and psychological resilience/efficacy/ competence are likely to be welcomed, useful, and most likely be of continued enduring benefit. Finally, in order to develop evidence-based practice, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies (e.g., randomized, controlled trials), testing such interventions in the burn-injured population.",
author = "Fauerbach, {James A} and Bresnick, {Melissa G.} and Smith, {Michael T}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780387486680",
pages = "173--190",
booktitle = "Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects",
publisher = "Springer US",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Coping with burn injury

T2 - Research summary and a new model of the influence of coping on psychological complications

AU - Fauerbach, James A

AU - Bresnick, Melissa G.

AU - Smith, Michael T

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The level of evidence accrued to date precludes definitive recommendations. However, tentative recommendations can be offered in light of the knowledge gathered up to this point. First, the psychosocial care of individuals with burn injuries must be universally available and must incorporate routine assessment during the acute care phase. Second, assessment should include pre-injury level of health and function, history of psychological distress, and social support, as well as several indices of psychological distress (e.g., depression, posttraumatic distress, body image dissatisfaction), methods of coping with the burn injury and its complications, and, identifying health-promoting individual strengths (e.g., self-efficacy, resilience, optimism) and social resources. Third, intervention during hospitalization (versus after discharge) is probably optimal because the distress is severe, openness to care is enhanced, concern with stigmatization is reduced, and access to services is more universal than it will ever be following discharge. Fourth, interventions that focus on enhancing coping skills and improving physical and psychological resilience/efficacy/ competence are likely to be welcomed, useful, and most likely be of continued enduring benefit. Finally, in order to develop evidence-based practice, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies (e.g., randomized, controlled trials), testing such interventions in the burn-injured population.

AB - The level of evidence accrued to date precludes definitive recommendations. However, tentative recommendations can be offered in light of the knowledge gathered up to this point. First, the psychosocial care of individuals with burn injuries must be universally available and must incorporate routine assessment during the acute care phase. Second, assessment should include pre-injury level of health and function, history of psychological distress, and social support, as well as several indices of psychological distress (e.g., depression, posttraumatic distress, body image dissatisfaction), methods of coping with the burn injury and its complications, and, identifying health-promoting individual strengths (e.g., self-efficacy, resilience, optimism) and social resources. Third, intervention during hospitalization (versus after discharge) is probably optimal because the distress is severe, openness to care is enhanced, concern with stigmatization is reduced, and access to services is more universal than it will ever be following discharge. Fourth, interventions that focus on enhancing coping skills and improving physical and psychological resilience/efficacy/ competence are likely to be welcomed, useful, and most likely be of continued enduring benefit. Finally, in order to develop evidence-based practice, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies (e.g., randomized, controlled trials), testing such interventions in the burn-injured population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349161873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349161873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-48670-3_9

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:70349161873

SN - 9780387486680

SP - 173

EP - 190

BT - Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Aspects

PB - Springer US

ER -