Controlling the local false discovery rate in the adaptive Lasso

Joshua N. Sampson, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Raymond J. Carroll, Samuel Müller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Lasso shrinkage procedure achieved its popularity, in part, by its tendency to shrink estimated coefficients to zero, and its ability to serve as a variable selection procedure. Using data-adaptive weights, the adaptive Lasso modified the original procedure to increase the penalty terms for those variables estimated to be less important by ordinary least squares. Although this modified procedure attained the oracle properties, the resulting models tend to include a large number of "false positives" in practice. Here, we adapt the concept of local false discovery rates (lFDRs) so that it applies to the sequence, λn, of smoothing parameters for the adaptive Lasso.We define the lFDR for a given λn to be the probability that the variable added to the model by decreasing λn to λn - δ is not associated with the outcome, where δ is a small value. We derive the relationship between the lFDR and λn, show lFDR =1 for traditional smoothing parameters, and show how to select λn so as to achieve a desired lFDR.We compare the smoothing parameters chosen to achieve a specified lFDR and those chosen to achieve the oracle properties, as well as their resulting estimates for model coefficients, with both simulation and an example from a genetic study of prostate specific antigen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-666
Number of pages14
JournalBiostatistics
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Adaptive Lasso
  • Local false discovery rate
  • Smoothing parameter
  • Variable selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this