Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries

Jane T. Bertrand, Tara M. Sullivan, Ellen A. Knowles, Muhammad F. Zeeshan, James D. Shelton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

CONTEXT: Method mix—the percentage distribution of contraceptive users in a given country, by method—is one measure that reflects the availability of a range of contraceptive methods. A skewed method mix—one in which 50% or more of contraceptive users rely on a single method—could be cause for concern as a sign of insufficiency of alternative methods or provider bias. Shifts in method mix are important to individual countries, donors and scholars studying contraceptive dynamics.

METHODS: To determine current patterns and recent changes in method mix, we examined 109 low- and middle-income countries. A variety of statistical methods were used to test four factors as correlates of skewed method mix: geographic region, family planning program effort index, modern contraceptive prevalence rate and human development index. An assessment of changes in reliance on female and male sterilization, the IUD, the implant and the inject able was conducted for countries with available data.

RESULTS: Of the 109 countries included in this analysis, 30% had a skewed method mix—a modest decrease from 35% in a 2006 analysis. Only geographic region showed any correlation with method skew, but it was only marginally significant. The proportion of users relying on female sterilization, male sterilization or the IUD decreased in far more countries than it increased; the pattern was reversed for the inject able.

CONCLUSION: Method mix skew is not a definitive indicator of lack of contraceptive choice or provider bias; it may instead reflect cultural preferences. In countries with a skewed method mix, investigation is warranted to identify the cause.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-153
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Contraception
contraceptive
income
Reproductive Sterilization
Contraceptive Agents
method
human development index
cause
Family Planning Services
Human Development
family planning
trend
statistical method
Delivery of Health Care
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Demography
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries. / Bertrand, Jane T.; Sullivan, Tara M.; Knowles, Ellen A.; Zeeshan, Muhammad F.; Shelton, James D.

In: International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 144-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bertrand, Jane T. ; Sullivan, Tara M. ; Knowles, Ellen A. ; Zeeshan, Muhammad F. ; Shelton, James D. / Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries. In: International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 144-153.
@article{9ad508fd59a94e5a93b441196b708c25,
title = "Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Method mix—the percentage distribution of contraceptive users in a given country, by method—is one measure that reflects the availability of a range of contraceptive methods. A skewed method mix—one in which 50{\%} or more of contraceptive users rely on a single method—could be cause for concern as a sign of insufficiency of alternative methods or provider bias. Shifts in method mix are important to individual countries, donors and scholars studying contraceptive dynamics.METHODS: To determine current patterns and recent changes in method mix, we examined 109 low- and middle-income countries. A variety of statistical methods were used to test four factors as correlates of skewed method mix: geographic region, family planning program effort index, modern contraceptive prevalence rate and human development index. An assessment of changes in reliance on female and male sterilization, the IUD, the implant and the inject able was conducted for countries with available data.RESULTS: Of the 109 countries included in this analysis, 30{\%} had a skewed method mix—a modest decrease from 35{\%} in a 2006 analysis. Only geographic region showed any correlation with method skew, but it was only marginally significant. The proportion of users relying on female sterilization, male sterilization or the IUD decreased in far more countries than it increased; the pattern was reversed for the inject able.CONCLUSION: Method mix skew is not a definitive indicator of lack of contraceptive choice or provider bias; it may instead reflect cultural preferences. In countries with a skewed method mix, investigation is warranted to identify the cause.",
author = "Bertrand, {Jane T.} and Sullivan, {Tara M.} and Knowles, {Ellen A.} and Zeeshan, {Muhammad F.} and Shelton, {James D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1363/4014414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "144--153",
journal = "International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1944-0391",
publisher = "Alan Guttmacher Institute",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low- and middle-income countries

AU - Bertrand, Jane T.

AU - Sullivan, Tara M.

AU - Knowles, Ellen A.

AU - Zeeshan, Muhammad F.

AU - Shelton, James D.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Method mix—the percentage distribution of contraceptive users in a given country, by method—is one measure that reflects the availability of a range of contraceptive methods. A skewed method mix—one in which 50% or more of contraceptive users rely on a single method—could be cause for concern as a sign of insufficiency of alternative methods or provider bias. Shifts in method mix are important to individual countries, donors and scholars studying contraceptive dynamics.METHODS: To determine current patterns and recent changes in method mix, we examined 109 low- and middle-income countries. A variety of statistical methods were used to test four factors as correlates of skewed method mix: geographic region, family planning program effort index, modern contraceptive prevalence rate and human development index. An assessment of changes in reliance on female and male sterilization, the IUD, the implant and the inject able was conducted for countries with available data.RESULTS: Of the 109 countries included in this analysis, 30% had a skewed method mix—a modest decrease from 35% in a 2006 analysis. Only geographic region showed any correlation with method skew, but it was only marginally significant. The proportion of users relying on female sterilization, male sterilization or the IUD decreased in far more countries than it increased; the pattern was reversed for the inject able.CONCLUSION: Method mix skew is not a definitive indicator of lack of contraceptive choice or provider bias; it may instead reflect cultural preferences. In countries with a skewed method mix, investigation is warranted to identify the cause.

AB - CONTEXT: Method mix—the percentage distribution of contraceptive users in a given country, by method—is one measure that reflects the availability of a range of contraceptive methods. A skewed method mix—one in which 50% or more of contraceptive users rely on a single method—could be cause for concern as a sign of insufficiency of alternative methods or provider bias. Shifts in method mix are important to individual countries, donors and scholars studying contraceptive dynamics.METHODS: To determine current patterns and recent changes in method mix, we examined 109 low- and middle-income countries. A variety of statistical methods were used to test four factors as correlates of skewed method mix: geographic region, family planning program effort index, modern contraceptive prevalence rate and human development index. An assessment of changes in reliance on female and male sterilization, the IUD, the implant and the inject able was conducted for countries with available data.RESULTS: Of the 109 countries included in this analysis, 30% had a skewed method mix—a modest decrease from 35% in a 2006 analysis. Only geographic region showed any correlation with method skew, but it was only marginally significant. The proportion of users relying on female sterilization, male sterilization or the IUD decreased in far more countries than it increased; the pattern was reversed for the inject able.CONCLUSION: Method mix skew is not a definitive indicator of lack of contraceptive choice or provider bias; it may instead reflect cultural preferences. In countries with a skewed method mix, investigation is warranted to identify the cause.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907284441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907284441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1363/4014414

DO - 10.1363/4014414

M3 - Article

C2 - 25271650

AN - SCOPUS:84907284441

VL - 40

SP - 144

EP - 153

JO - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1944-0391

IS - 3

ER -