TY - JOUR
T1 - Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Richter, Holly E.
AU - Burgio, Kathryn L.
AU - Brubaker, Linda
AU - Nygaard, Ingrid E.
AU - Ye, Wen
AU - Weidner, Alison
AU - Bradley, Catherine S.
AU - Handa, Victoria L.
AU - Borello-France, Diane
AU - Goode, Patricia S.
AU - Zyczynski, Halina
AU - Lukacz, Emily S.
AU - Schaffer, Joseph
AU - Barber, Matthew
AU - Meikle, Susan
AU - Spino, Cathie
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a continence pessary to evidence-based behavioral therapy for stress incontinence and to assess whether combined pessary and behavioral therapy is superior to single-modality therapy. Methods: This was a multisite, randomized clinical trial (Ambulatory Treatments for Leakage Associated with Stress Incontinence [ATLAS]) that randomly assigned 446 women with stress incontinence to pessary, behavioral therapy, or combined treatment. Primary outcome measures, at 3 months, were Patient Global Impression of Improvement and the stress incontinence subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. A priori, to be considered clinically superior, combination therapy had to be better than both single-modality therapies. Outcome measures were repeated at 6 and 12 months. Primary analyses used an intention-to-treat approach. Results: At 3 months, scores from 40% of the pessary group and 49% of the behavioral group were "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (P=.10). Compared with the pessary group, more women in the behavioral group reported having no bothersome incontinence symptoms (49% compared with 33%, P=.006) and treatment satisfaction (75% compared with 63%, P=.02). Combination therapy was significantly better than pessary as shown on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (53%, P=.02) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (44%, P=.05) but not better than behavioral therapy; it was therefore not superior to single-modality therapy. Group differences were not sustained to 12 months on any measure, and patient satisfaction remained above 50% for all treatment groups. Conclusion: Behavioral therapy resulted in greater patient satisfaction and fewer bothersome incontinence symptoms than pessary at 3 months, but differences did not persist to 12 months. Combination therapy was not superior to single-modality therapy.
AB - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a continence pessary to evidence-based behavioral therapy for stress incontinence and to assess whether combined pessary and behavioral therapy is superior to single-modality therapy. Methods: This was a multisite, randomized clinical trial (Ambulatory Treatments for Leakage Associated with Stress Incontinence [ATLAS]) that randomly assigned 446 women with stress incontinence to pessary, behavioral therapy, or combined treatment. Primary outcome measures, at 3 months, were Patient Global Impression of Improvement and the stress incontinence subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory. A priori, to be considered clinically superior, combination therapy had to be better than both single-modality therapies. Outcome measures were repeated at 6 and 12 months. Primary analyses used an intention-to-treat approach. Results: At 3 months, scores from 40% of the pessary group and 49% of the behavioral group were "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (P=.10). Compared with the pessary group, more women in the behavioral group reported having no bothersome incontinence symptoms (49% compared with 33%, P=.006) and treatment satisfaction (75% compared with 63%, P=.02). Combination therapy was significantly better than pessary as shown on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (53%, P=.02) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (44%, P=.05) but not better than behavioral therapy; it was therefore not superior to single-modality therapy. Group differences were not sustained to 12 months on any measure, and patient satisfaction remained above 50% for all treatment groups. Conclusion: Behavioral therapy resulted in greater patient satisfaction and fewer bothersome incontinence symptoms than pessary at 3 months, but differences did not persist to 12 months. Combination therapy was not superior to single-modality therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649146667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649146667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4
M3 - Article
C2 - 20177294
AN - SCOPUS:77649146667
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 115
SP - 609
EP - 617
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 3
ER -