Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists

Gautam Jayram, Brian Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with complex stone burdens. We performed a study to assess the effect of urologist-specific parameters on the use of PCNL - both the access component of the procedure as well as the stone removal. We also examined trends in PCNL utilization over time. Methods: We analyzed self-reported 6-month case logs submitted to The American Board of Urology (ABU) for urologists who certified or recertified between 2004 and 2013. Surgeons performing PCNL were identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding. Urologist-specific data, including fellowship training, practice type, and practice population, were used to further stratify this cohort. Trends were examined over the study period. Results: A total of 7278 urologists submitted case logs to the ABU between 2004 and 2013. The median ages of the initial certification group, first recertification group, and second recertification group were 36.0, 43.7, and 53 years, respectively. A greater proportion of newly certified urologists performed PCNL (53%) compared with urologists in the first (41%) and second (29%) recertification groups; initially certified urologists were also more likely to be high volume (>10) PCNL surgeons. Urologists with fellowship training were more likely to use PCNL (66%) and be high-volume surgeons (26.4%). PCNL utilization increased significantly during the study period, with 1330 procedures performed in 2004 and 2888 procedures performed in 2012 (117% increase). Conclusions: Younger and fellowship-trained urologists are the primary users of PCNL; the majority of senior urologists do not perform this operation. Overall, the use of PCNL and urologist-directed access has increased in the previous decade.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1304-1307
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Urology
Urologists
Current Procedural Terminology
Certification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists. / Jayram, Gautam; Matlaga, Brian.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 28, No. 11, 2014, p. 1304-1307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2b89e6667114e808af2d659b742005f,
title = "Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with complex stone burdens. We performed a study to assess the effect of urologist-specific parameters on the use of PCNL - both the access component of the procedure as well as the stone removal. We also examined trends in PCNL utilization over time. Methods: We analyzed self-reported 6-month case logs submitted to The American Board of Urology (ABU) for urologists who certified or recertified between 2004 and 2013. Surgeons performing PCNL were identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding. Urologist-specific data, including fellowship training, practice type, and practice population, were used to further stratify this cohort. Trends were examined over the study period. Results: A total of 7278 urologists submitted case logs to the ABU between 2004 and 2013. The median ages of the initial certification group, first recertification group, and second recertification group were 36.0, 43.7, and 53 years, respectively. A greater proportion of newly certified urologists performed PCNL (53{\%}) compared with urologists in the first (41{\%}) and second (29{\%}) recertification groups; initially certified urologists were also more likely to be high volume (>10) PCNL surgeons. Urologists with fellowship training were more likely to use PCNL (66{\%}) and be high-volume surgeons (26.4{\%}). PCNL utilization increased significantly during the study period, with 1330 procedures performed in 2004 and 2888 procedures performed in 2012 (117{\%} increase). Conclusions: Younger and fellowship-trained urologists are the primary users of PCNL; the majority of senior urologists do not perform this operation. Overall, the use of PCNL and urologist-directed access has increased in the previous decade.",
author = "Gautam Jayram and Brian Matlaga",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1089/end.2014.0465",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1304--1307",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists

AU - Jayram, Gautam

AU - Matlaga, Brian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with complex stone burdens. We performed a study to assess the effect of urologist-specific parameters on the use of PCNL - both the access component of the procedure as well as the stone removal. We also examined trends in PCNL utilization over time. Methods: We analyzed self-reported 6-month case logs submitted to The American Board of Urology (ABU) for urologists who certified or recertified between 2004 and 2013. Surgeons performing PCNL were identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding. Urologist-specific data, including fellowship training, practice type, and practice population, were used to further stratify this cohort. Trends were examined over the study period. Results: A total of 7278 urologists submitted case logs to the ABU between 2004 and 2013. The median ages of the initial certification group, first recertification group, and second recertification group were 36.0, 43.7, and 53 years, respectively. A greater proportion of newly certified urologists performed PCNL (53%) compared with urologists in the first (41%) and second (29%) recertification groups; initially certified urologists were also more likely to be high volume (>10) PCNL surgeons. Urologists with fellowship training were more likely to use PCNL (66%) and be high-volume surgeons (26.4%). PCNL utilization increased significantly during the study period, with 1330 procedures performed in 2004 and 2888 procedures performed in 2012 (117% increase). Conclusions: Younger and fellowship-trained urologists are the primary users of PCNL; the majority of senior urologists do not perform this operation. Overall, the use of PCNL and urologist-directed access has increased in the previous decade.

AB - Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with complex stone burdens. We performed a study to assess the effect of urologist-specific parameters on the use of PCNL - both the access component of the procedure as well as the stone removal. We also examined trends in PCNL utilization over time. Methods: We analyzed self-reported 6-month case logs submitted to The American Board of Urology (ABU) for urologists who certified or recertified between 2004 and 2013. Surgeons performing PCNL were identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding. Urologist-specific data, including fellowship training, practice type, and practice population, were used to further stratify this cohort. Trends were examined over the study period. Results: A total of 7278 urologists submitted case logs to the ABU between 2004 and 2013. The median ages of the initial certification group, first recertification group, and second recertification group were 36.0, 43.7, and 53 years, respectively. A greater proportion of newly certified urologists performed PCNL (53%) compared with urologists in the first (41%) and second (29%) recertification groups; initially certified urologists were also more likely to be high volume (>10) PCNL surgeons. Urologists with fellowship training were more likely to use PCNL (66%) and be high-volume surgeons (26.4%). PCNL utilization increased significantly during the study period, with 1330 procedures performed in 2004 and 2888 procedures performed in 2012 (117% increase). Conclusions: Younger and fellowship-trained urologists are the primary users of PCNL; the majority of senior urologists do not perform this operation. Overall, the use of PCNL and urologist-directed access has increased in the previous decade.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929510762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929510762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2014.0465

DO - 10.1089/end.2014.0465

M3 - Article

C2 - 25036914

AN - SCOPUS:84929510762

VL - 28

SP - 1304

EP - 1307

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 11

ER -