Contemplation and conversation

Subtle influences on moral decision making

Brian C. Gunia, Long Wang, Li Huang, Jiunwen Wang, J. Keith Murnighan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research investigated the role of contemplation, conversation (conceptualized as social contemplation), and explanation in right-wrong decisions. Several theories suggest that contemplation or morally oriented conversation will promote ethical decisions and that immediate choice or self-interested conversation will not; other theories suggest that individuals' explanations will reinforce their decisions. An experimental task tempting people to lie supported all of these predictions. In addition, truth tellers viewed the situation as morally oriented, and non-truth tellers viewed it as oriented around self-interest, both before and after their decisions. These findings provided the basis for a new process model of moral decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-33
Number of pages21
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Decision making
Moral decision making
Process model
Prediction
Decision rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Contemplation and conversation : Subtle influences on moral decision making. / Gunia, Brian C.; Wang, Long; Huang, Li; Wang, Jiunwen; Murnighan, J. Keith.

In: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 13-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gunia, Brian C. ; Wang, Long ; Huang, Li ; Wang, Jiunwen ; Murnighan, J. Keith. / Contemplation and conversation : Subtle influences on moral decision making. In: Academy of Management Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 13-33.
@article{57269afb91df482da1fd1638f1aef53a,
title = "Contemplation and conversation: Subtle influences on moral decision making",
abstract = "This research investigated the role of contemplation, conversation (conceptualized as social contemplation), and explanation in right-wrong decisions. Several theories suggest that contemplation or morally oriented conversation will promote ethical decisions and that immediate choice or self-interested conversation will not; other theories suggest that individuals' explanations will reinforce their decisions. An experimental task tempting people to lie supported all of these predictions. In addition, truth tellers viewed the situation as morally oriented, and non-truth tellers viewed it as oriented around self-interest, both before and after their decisions. These findings provided the basis for a new process model of moral decision making.",
author = "Gunia, {Brian C.} and Long Wang and Li Huang and Jiunwen Wang and Murnighan, {J. Keith}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amj.2009.0873",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "13--33",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemplation and conversation

T2 - Subtle influences on moral decision making

AU - Gunia, Brian C.

AU - Wang, Long

AU - Huang, Li

AU - Wang, Jiunwen

AU - Murnighan, J. Keith

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - This research investigated the role of contemplation, conversation (conceptualized as social contemplation), and explanation in right-wrong decisions. Several theories suggest that contemplation or morally oriented conversation will promote ethical decisions and that immediate choice or self-interested conversation will not; other theories suggest that individuals' explanations will reinforce their decisions. An experimental task tempting people to lie supported all of these predictions. In addition, truth tellers viewed the situation as morally oriented, and non-truth tellers viewed it as oriented around self-interest, both before and after their decisions. These findings provided the basis for a new process model of moral decision making.

AB - This research investigated the role of contemplation, conversation (conceptualized as social contemplation), and explanation in right-wrong decisions. Several theories suggest that contemplation or morally oriented conversation will promote ethical decisions and that immediate choice or self-interested conversation will not; other theories suggest that individuals' explanations will reinforce their decisions. An experimental task tempting people to lie supported all of these predictions. In addition, truth tellers viewed the situation as morally oriented, and non-truth tellers viewed it as oriented around self-interest, both before and after their decisions. These findings provided the basis for a new process model of moral decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863338071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863338071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amj.2009.0873

DO - 10.5465/amj.2009.0873

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 13

EP - 33

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 1

ER -