Containment and Support

Core and Complexity in Spatial Language Learning

Barbara Landau, Kristen Johannes, Dimitrios Skordos, Anna Papafragou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Containment and support have traditionally been assumed to represent universal conceptual foundations for spatial terms. This assumption can be challenged, however: English in and on are applied across a surprisingly broad range of exemplars, and comparable terms in other languages show significant variation in their application. We propose that the broad domains of both containment and support have internal structure that reflects different subtypes, that this structure is reflected in basic spatial term usage across languages, and that it constrains children's spatial term learning. Using a newly developed battery, we asked how adults and 4-year-old children speaking English or Greek distribute basic spatial terms across subtypes of containment and support. We found that containment showed similar distributions of basic terms across subtypes among all groups while support showed such similarity only among adults, with striking differences between children learning English versus Greek. We conclude that the two domains differ considerably in the learning problems they present, and that learning in and on is remarkably complex. Together, our results point to the need for a more nuanced view of spatial term learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCognitive Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Language
Learning
Spatial Learning
Spatial Language
Containment
Language Acquisition
Spatial Terms

Keywords

  • Containment
  • Cross-linguistic
  • Language learning
  • Spatial language
  • Spatial relations
  • Support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Containment and Support : Core and Complexity in Spatial Language Learning. / Landau, Barbara; Johannes, Kristen; Skordos, Dimitrios; Papafragou, Anna.

In: Cognitive Science, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Landau, Barbara ; Johannes, Kristen ; Skordos, Dimitrios ; Papafragou, Anna. / Containment and Support : Core and Complexity in Spatial Language Learning. In: Cognitive Science. 2016.
@article{1126d30dab7d43da9b2474c7b0bb0a8e,
title = "Containment and Support: Core and Complexity in Spatial Language Learning",
abstract = "Containment and support have traditionally been assumed to represent universal conceptual foundations for spatial terms. This assumption can be challenged, however: English in and on are applied across a surprisingly broad range of exemplars, and comparable terms in other languages show significant variation in their application. We propose that the broad domains of both containment and support have internal structure that reflects different subtypes, that this structure is reflected in basic spatial term usage across languages, and that it constrains children's spatial term learning. Using a newly developed battery, we asked how adults and 4-year-old children speaking English or Greek distribute basic spatial terms across subtypes of containment and support. We found that containment showed similar distributions of basic terms across subtypes among all groups while support showed such similarity only among adults, with striking differences between children learning English versus Greek. We conclude that the two domains differ considerably in the learning problems they present, and that learning in and on is remarkably complex. Together, our results point to the need for a more nuanced view of spatial term learning.",
keywords = "Containment, Cross-linguistic, Language learning, Spatial language, Spatial relations, Support",
author = "Barbara Landau and Kristen Johannes and Dimitrios Skordos and Anna Papafragou",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/cogs.12389",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Containment and Support

T2 - Core and Complexity in Spatial Language Learning

AU - Landau, Barbara

AU - Johannes, Kristen

AU - Skordos, Dimitrios

AU - Papafragou, Anna

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Containment and support have traditionally been assumed to represent universal conceptual foundations for spatial terms. This assumption can be challenged, however: English in and on are applied across a surprisingly broad range of exemplars, and comparable terms in other languages show significant variation in their application. We propose that the broad domains of both containment and support have internal structure that reflects different subtypes, that this structure is reflected in basic spatial term usage across languages, and that it constrains children's spatial term learning. Using a newly developed battery, we asked how adults and 4-year-old children speaking English or Greek distribute basic spatial terms across subtypes of containment and support. We found that containment showed similar distributions of basic terms across subtypes among all groups while support showed such similarity only among adults, with striking differences between children learning English versus Greek. We conclude that the two domains differ considerably in the learning problems they present, and that learning in and on is remarkably complex. Together, our results point to the need for a more nuanced view of spatial term learning.

AB - Containment and support have traditionally been assumed to represent universal conceptual foundations for spatial terms. This assumption can be challenged, however: English in and on are applied across a surprisingly broad range of exemplars, and comparable terms in other languages show significant variation in their application. We propose that the broad domains of both containment and support have internal structure that reflects different subtypes, that this structure is reflected in basic spatial term usage across languages, and that it constrains children's spatial term learning. Using a newly developed battery, we asked how adults and 4-year-old children speaking English or Greek distribute basic spatial terms across subtypes of containment and support. We found that containment showed similar distributions of basic terms across subtypes among all groups while support showed such similarity only among adults, with striking differences between children learning English versus Greek. We conclude that the two domains differ considerably in the learning problems they present, and that learning in and on is remarkably complex. Together, our results point to the need for a more nuanced view of spatial term learning.

KW - Containment

KW - Cross-linguistic

KW - Language learning

KW - Spatial language

KW - Spatial relations

KW - Support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977531124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977531124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.12389

DO - 10.1111/cogs.12389

M3 - Article

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

ER -